<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rupert Murdoch’s Next Move &#8211; Blogging?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Mills</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin Mills]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a copy.  Not sure how many more there are out there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a copy.  Not sure how many more there are out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edward denniston</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124924</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[edward denniston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thankyou John Gilbert, for you reply about Not Yet The Times query. I have a copy of the publication but I was looking for a bit more information it. How may were published? How rare is it? What were the sales numbers?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Edward Denniston&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankyou John Gilbert, for you reply about Not Yet The Times query. I have a copy of the publication but I was looking for a bit more information it. How may were published? How rare is it? What were the sales numbers?</p>
<p>Edward Denniston</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gilbert</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Gilbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I still have a copy of this spoof version of the Times. I only recall it was produced during the strike but if you want to know what is in it let me know.
John&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still have a copy of this spoof version of the Times. I only recall it was produced during the strike but if you want to know what is in it let me know.<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edward denniston</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[edward denniston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;QUESTION: Does anyone out there know anything about an edition of the Times called Not Yet The Times, published during the Wapping dispute?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Edward Denniston (Waterford, Ireland)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QUESTION: Does anyone out there know anything about an edition of the Times called Not Yet The Times, published during the Wapping dispute?</p>
<p>Edward Denniston (Waterford, Ireland)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The whole point of the blogs is that it puts the individual in control. Anyone can be published. Are you an aspiring journalist? Then start a blog, and report on stories yourself. You can even monatize your blog with ads, generating some income. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As traditional newspapers, such as the New York Times, become more corrupted by the far left, more rational-minded people will turn to blogs.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole point of the blogs is that it puts the individual in control. Anyone can be published. Are you an aspiring journalist? Then start a blog, and report on stories yourself. You can even monatize your blog with ads, generating some income. </p>
<p>As traditional newspapers, such as the New York Times, become more corrupted by the far left, more rational-minded people will turn to blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure I agree, the value of buying a hugely popular blogging &lt;em&gt;platform&lt;/em&gt; such as six apart would be limited. He&#039;d be better buying a well engineered younger less populous platform. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;He&#039;d use his market power through newspapers etc to build users quickly enough, why go to the expense of buying a fully populated business which is not growing virally? Buying Myspace made sense since it is growing organically, but if you are just buying technology why buy a populated platform that probably doesn&#039;t contribute much to advertising income, and isn&#039;t growing on its own?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If he wants to talk - I am in Brisbane ;-)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I agree, the value of buying a hugely popular blogging <em>platform</em> such as six apart would be limited. He&#8217;d be better buying a well engineered younger less populous platform. </p>
<p>He&#8217;d use his market power through newspapers etc to build users quickly enough, why go to the expense of buying a fully populated business which is not growing virally? Buying Myspace made sense since it is growing organically, but if you are just buying technology why buy a populated platform that probably doesn&#8217;t contribute much to advertising income, and isn&#8217;t growing on its own?</p>
<p>If he wants to talk &#8211; I am in Brisbane ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavier Casanova</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xavier Casanova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Gustav: good point. Technorati actually makes more sense (IMHO) than SixApart, from the monetization standpoint.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gustav: good point. Technorati actually makes more sense (IMHO) than SixApart, from the monetization standpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Young</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124918</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Young]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Gustav,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Excellent question.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As I wrote in a prior piece&#8230; http://gigaom.com/2006/04/04/socialnets-the-power-of-the-url/, I oftentimes look at the web as a vast collection of URLs that are divided into 2 segments: (1) the URLs used to &quot;broadcast&quot; content, and (2) URLs controlled by people.  I believe Murdoch is now trying to capture the major market share of #2&#8230; which is how I define social media.  So, while buying a blogging search engine could very well be in the cards, it&#039;s probably more strategic for him to acquire a major blogging platform first (and he can then add those URLs to all the MySpace profile URLs).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hope this also serves to answer some of the other commentor&#039;s questions.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gustav,</p>
<p>Excellent question.  </p>
<p>As I wrote in a prior piece&#8230; <a href="http://gigaom.com/2006/04/04/socialnets-the-power-of-the-url/" rel="nofollow">http://gigaom.com/2006/04/04/socialnets-the-power-of-the-url/</a>, I oftentimes look at the web as a vast collection of URLs that are divided into 2 segments: (1) the URLs used to &#8220;broadcast&#8221; content, and (2) URLs controlled by people.  I believe Murdoch is now trying to capture the major market share of #2&#8230; which is how I define social media.  So, while buying a blogging search engine could very well be in the cards, it&#8217;s probably more strategic for him to acquire a major blogging platform first (and he can then add those URLs to all the MySpace profile URLs).</p>
<p>Hope this also serves to answer some of the other commentor&#8217;s questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gustav</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124917</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gustav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;If Mr. Murdoch is interested in blogging, might he not be interested in a big blog search engine player (e.g. Technorati) player as well?  MySpace is already bigger than all those other businesses you mentioned combined, but it doesn&#039;t have the search, and without that it can&#039;t be the Google of Blogosphere.  Thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Mr. Murdoch is interested in blogging, might he not be interested in a big blog search engine player (e.g. Technorati) player as well?  MySpace is already bigger than all those other businesses you mentioned combined, but it doesn&#8217;t have the search, and without that it can&#8217;t be the Google of Blogosphere.  Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Isabel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;When I read the RSS headline, I thought Murdoch himself was starting a blog. After the president of Iran, the Carindal of Boston, you never know.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think buying a blogging platform parallels the Wapping Dispute though. When News Corp built the Wapping printing plant, it already had an army of content producers on staff. But with a SixApart/Automattic, bloggers are customers/community members who can&#039;t necessarily be counted on to support whatever agenda News Corp uses the technology to advance.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read the RSS headline, I thought Murdoch himself was starting a blog. After the president of Iran, the Carindal of Boston, you never know.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think buying a blogging platform parallels the Wapping Dispute though. When News Corp built the Wapping printing plant, it already had an army of content producers on staff. But with a SixApart/Automattic, bloggers are customers/community members who can&#8217;t necessarily be counted on to support whatever agenda News Corp uses the technology to advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: domelhor.net</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124915</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[domelhor.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Opera leva Wii  Web&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;tima notcia para os gammers: o console para videogames Nintendo, a exemplo do do DS, ter suporte para navegao pelo Opera. O navegador, segundo blogs especializados no Wii, ser grtis at junho de 2007.
http://reporternet.zip.net&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Opera leva Wii  Web&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>tima notcia para os gammers: o console para videogames Nintendo, a exemplo do do DS, ter suporte para navegao pelo Opera. O navegador, segundo blogs especializados no Wii, ser grtis at junho de 2007.<br />
<a href="http://reporternet.zip.net&#8230;" rel="nofollow">http://reporternet.zip.net&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carl</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[carl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Anyone else noticed, all the talk nowadays is about Murdoch, not Gates &#8230;?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Having been a print compositor apprentice (after a few months of which I decided to return to college) I have somewhat mixed feelings about the infamous Murdoch and Wapping period of our social history; seems like Murdoch is about to be - once again - a big part of our new social history &#8230; ironically, this time he may well undermine his own printing presses?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else noticed, all the talk nowadays is about Murdoch, not Gates &#8230;?</p>
<p>Having been a print compositor apprentice (after a few months of which I decided to return to college) I have somewhat mixed feelings about the infamous Murdoch and Wapping period of our social history; seems like Murdoch is about to be &#8211; once again &#8211; a big part of our new social history &#8230; ironically, this time he may well undermine his own printing presses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;prescient or not&#8230;i enjoyed this post&#8230;if i were murdoch would i go for six apart or automattic&#8230;hmmmmmmmm?
Six Apart is more like a traditional business i.e. completely in the market, while Wordpress is half in the commons and half in the market.
&#8230;it&#039;s a tough call&#8230;Six Apart is less risky&#8230; Right now i would say Six Apart, but i can&#039;t imagine SA culture getting on with murdoch&#039;s, although he probably can be a charming bastard.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prescient or not&#8230;i enjoyed this post&#8230;if i were murdoch would i go for six apart or automattic&#8230;hmmmmmmmm?<br />
Six Apart is more like a traditional business i.e. completely in the market, while WordPress is half in the commons and half in the market.<br />
&#8230;it&#8217;s a tough call&#8230;Six Apart is less risky&#8230; Right now i would say Six Apart, but i can&#8217;t imagine SA culture getting on with murdoch&#8217;s, although he probably can be a charming bastard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think you &quot;get it&quot;. Blogs are a necessary component of a vibrant newsmedia, not the antidote or successor to tradititional reporting. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The next media czar will embrace the economics of paying much less for news, but reporting is still and always will be a craft which requires more then scanning other media for information.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you &#8220;get it&#8221;. Blogs are a necessary component of a vibrant newsmedia, not the antidote or successor to tradititional reporting. </p>
<p>The next media czar will embrace the economics of paying much less for news, but reporting is still and always will be a craft which requires more then scanning other media for information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavier Casanova</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124911</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xavier Casanova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 05:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Aren&#039;t they interested in communities, as opposed to tools/platforms? If so, while I think getting into blogging might make sense, I&#039;d see them buying a few blog networks instead, maybe GigaOM?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You never know.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t they interested in communities, as opposed to tools/platforms? If so, while I think getting into blogging might make sense, I&#8217;d see them buying a few blog networks instead, maybe GigaOM?</p>
<p>You never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vishal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/27/rupert-murdoch-blogging/#comment-124910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;To me at a high level this is the consequence of two things and is summarized well,
1. World is flat and getting flatter.
2. The long tail&#8230; and continues.
These two effects will cause enormous ups and down for media and technology based industry.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me at a high level this is the consequence of two things and is summarized well,<br />
1. World is flat and getting flatter.<br />
2. The long tail&#8230; and continues.<br />
These two effects will cause enormous ups and down for media and technology based industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

