<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FON selling $5 Wireless Router</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:54:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: flingster</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/#comment-65343</link>
		<dc:creator>flingster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/#comment-65343</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I like this idea however I don&#039;t like the idea of being tied down to one hardware type.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know of any software based solutions only.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I can have a so called public element and private element to my internet connection. That way I can just continue with my own setup privately and the public element is effectively sandboxed off...kinda like a QOS value to it...where i say anyone can connect to me and the internet wirelessly if they are within range and i&#039;ve allocated say a 10% quota of my total bandwidth to this share. It will never go over the 10% and its separate from the rest of my traffic. A number of users could connect to this 10% on a similar P2P type scenario all sharing that 10%...if there is another in the region also sharing it can use both and handle traffic between say 10 other wireless local quotas effectively building into a larger bandwidth connection albeit possibly using 10 local wireless hotspots...piggy banking off all?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;it needs to be open and platform independant so you&#039;d just install it as an extension to an interface setting...couple of clicks say on tcp/ip settings page...thats it.
cheers
flingster.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this idea however I don&#8217;t like the idea of being tied down to one hardware type.</p>
<p>Does anyone know of any software based solutions only.</p>
<p>So I can have a so called public element and private element to my internet connection. That way I can just continue with my own setup privately and the public element is effectively sandboxed off&#8230;kinda like a QOS value to it&#8230;where i say anyone can connect to me and the internet wirelessly if they are within range and i&#8217;ve allocated say a 10% quota of my total bandwidth to this share. It will never go over the 10% and its separate from the rest of my traffic. A number of users could connect to this 10% on a similar P2P type scenario all sharing that 10%&#8230;if there is another in the region also sharing it can use both and handle traffic between say 10 other wireless local quotas effectively building into a larger bandwidth connection albeit possibly using 10 local wireless hotspots&#8230;piggy banking off all?</p>
<p>it needs to be open and platform independant so you&#8217;d just install it as an extension to an interface setting&#8230;couple of clicks say on tcp/ip settings page&#8230;thats it.<br />
cheers<br />
flingster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/#comment-65342</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/#comment-65342</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve got two Fon routers (the $5 Linksys model) running and have set up several for others.  Easy to install, quite secure if you know how to set up your primary router (the Fon unit acts as a client to your primary router, not as a replacement) and highly reliable.  It is specifically NOT like running a standard wireless router with no security -- connections made via the Fon router are isolated from the rest of your network.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got two Fon routers (the $5 Linksys model) running and have set up several for others.  Easy to install, quite secure if you know how to set up your primary router (the Fon unit acts as a client to your primary router, not as a replacement) and highly reliable.  It is specifically NOT like running a standard wireless router with no security &#8212; connections made via the Fon router are isolated from the rest of your network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashish</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/#comment-65341</link>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/#comment-65341</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;$5 for a wireless router! Wow! I wonder if such things will work in developing countries&#8230; or will such a biz model work only in places where there is high speed Internet access? If so, can the cost be kept low still?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$5 for a wireless router! Wow! I wonder if such things will work in developing countries&#8230; or will such a biz model work only in places where there is high speed Internet access? If so, can the cost be kept low still?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Droege</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/#comment-65340</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Droege</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/#comment-65340</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I bought a linksys FON router a month or so ago and could never figure out how to set it up. I tried manual configurations, etc and nothing worked. It kept telling me that my network wasn&#039;t configured correctly. The &quot;manual&quot; was 1 piece of paper with very poor directions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If these things don&#039;t work right out of the box, people will just call it a $5 experiment and never use it again.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said, I really like the concept, but the implementation leaves a lot of room for improvement, especially given the amount of funding they&#039;ve received.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a linksys FON router a month or so ago and could never figure out how to set it up. I tried manual configurations, etc and nothing worked. It kept telling me that my network wasn&#8217;t configured correctly. The &#8220;manual&#8221; was 1 piece of paper with very poor directions.</p>
<p>If these things don&#8217;t work right out of the box, people will just call it a $5 experiment and never use it again.</p>
<p>That said, I really like the concept, but the implementation leaves a lot of room for improvement, especially given the amount of funding they&#8217;ve received.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Gibson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/#comment-65339</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/#comment-65339</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This sounds interesting.  I bought a Fon router back when they were based on Linksys hardware.  The problem then was that every wireless user (either public or private) had the same access to the internal network, making the router virtually useless.  See my last post on the probelms I had here: http://www.grantgibson.co.uk/blog/index.php/2006/09/17/fon-router-problems/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If this version has true separation of public and private wireless networks then it could be a success.  I&#039;m not sure how popular the system is in the US, but here in the UK there seems to be hotspots in every major town and city.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;LongRange makes a good point though - virtually every ISP bans the sharing of your connection in their Terms and Conditions.  Most are tolerant for now, but if Fon reaches the critical mass to make it a viable mesh network it&#039;s likely the ISPs would crack down on it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Grant.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds interesting.  I bought a Fon router back when they were based on Linksys hardware.  The problem then was that every wireless user (either public or private) had the same access to the internal network, making the router virtually useless.  See my last post on the probelms I had here: <a href="http://www.grantgibson.co.uk/blog/index.php/2006/09/17/fon-router-problems/" rel="nofollow">http://www.grantgibson.co.uk/blog/index.php/2006/09/17/fon-router-problems/</a></p>
<p>If this version has true separation of public and private wireless networks then it could be a success.  I&#8217;m not sure how popular the system is in the US, but here in the UK there seems to be hotspots in every major town and city.  </p>
<p>LongRange makes a good point though &#8211; virtually every ISP bans the sharing of your connection in their Terms and Conditions.  Most are tolerant for now, but if Fon reaches the critical mass to make it a viable mesh network it&#8217;s likely the ISPs would crack down on it.</p>
<p>Grant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MobileWhack.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/#comment-65338</link>
		<dc:creator>MobileWhack.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 01:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/#comment-65338</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FON $5 Wireless Router&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wireless services company FON, announced the release of their tiny wireless router- &quot;La Fonera&quot;, costing only five dollars.The device emits two SSIDs and allows you to create a private and/or a social channel. FON works on the idea that sharing&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>FON $5 Wireless Router&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Wireless services company FON, announced the release of their tiny wireless router- &#8220;La Fonera&#8221;, costing only five dollars.The device emits two SSIDs and allows you to create a private and/or a social channel. FON works on the idea that sharing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LongRange</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/#comment-65337</link>
		<dc:creator>LongRange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/19/fon-selling-5-wireless-router/#comment-65337</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;FON is a very interesting idea, although I really dont think it will ever catch on. The idea of opening up your network and your connection to complete strangers is a tough nut to crack. The other thing is that most ISP&#039;s in the US specifically prohibit resale or redistribution of their service, so you are looking a a violation of their TOS here. The one and only time I encountered a FON hotspot was in Rome near the Vatican, and I did not use it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FON is a very interesting idea, although I really dont think it will ever catch on. The idea of opening up your network and your connection to complete strangers is a tough nut to crack. The other thing is that most ISP&#8217;s in the US specifically prohibit resale or redistribution of their service, so you are looking a a violation of their TOS here. The one and only time I encountered a FON hotspot was in Rome near the Vatican, and I did not use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
