<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8020: American Idol of Digital Photography?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mikagami</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-884614</link>
		<dc:creator>mikagami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-884614</guid>
		<description>Thanks for da info!!! its give more idea...hahahahaa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for da info!!! its give more idea&#8230;hahahahaa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane Bushem</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-857029</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Bushem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-857029</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.  Thanks for the info. on 8020 Publishing, Inc. This does sound like a solid company with an exciting idea that's sure to gain traction.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Diane&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Thanks for the info. on 8020 Publishing, Inc. This does sound like a solid company with an exciting idea that&#8217;s sure to gain traction.</p>
<p>Diane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MOO on GigaOM &#171; YO, CEO!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-732595</link>
		<dc:creator>MOO on GigaOM &#171; YO, CEO!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-732595</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] them: Germany-based t-shirt maker Spreadshirt; Chicago-based Skinny Corp; and San Francisco-based 8020 Publishing, publishers of the JPG magazine. And CastingWords, which offers a transcription service based entirely on the web. In each case, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] them: Germany-based t-shirt maker Spreadshirt; Chicago-based Skinny Corp; and San Francisco-based 8020 Publishing, publishers of the JPG magazine. And CastingWords, which offers a transcription service based entirely on the web. In each case, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhotoShelter Wants to Take On Getty Images - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-725512</link>
		<dc:creator>PhotoShelter Wants to Take On Getty Images - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 05:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-725512</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] sourcing and photos are a happy (if somewhat less splashy) marriage. 8020 Publishing&#8217;s JPG magazine, which sources its entire content from its community, has been slowly and steadily growing its [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sourcing and photos are a happy (if somewhat less splashy) marriage. 8020 Publishing&#8217;s JPG magazine, which sources its entire content from its community, has been slowly and steadily growing its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sell Pictures</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-619204</link>
		<dc:creator>Sell Pictures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-619204</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is yet another example of how digital camera have revolutionized the photography niche - interesting article.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is yet another example of how digital camera have revolutionized the photography niche - interesting article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaffer Bhimji</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-457837</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaffer Bhimji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-457837</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I happen to stumbel upon JPG website and find it most exciting. Not only that but I will be subscribing to the magazine as well.
Best wishes to 8020.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;~Jaffer&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happen to stumbel upon JPG website and find it most exciting. Not only that but I will be subscribing to the magazine as well.<br />
Best wishes to 8020.</p>
<p>~Jaffer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe "The Photographer" White</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-446868</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe "The Photographer" White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-446868</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It seems like a good idea if you are thinking in terms of comparing it against traditional print media.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But I use Flickr.com to put together sets and collections all the time and then work with photographers to get permission to combine print versions of some of their photos with mine for putting together a private photo album.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why would I want a magazine full of photos chosen by a community if I can get the exact photos I want for a fraction of the costs?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like a good idea if you are thinking in terms of comparing it against traditional print media.</p>
<p>But I use Flickr.com to put together sets and collections all the time and then work with photographers to get permission to combine print versions of some of their photos with mine for putting together a private photo album.</p>
<p>Why would I want a magazine full of photos chosen by a community if I can get the exact photos I want for a fraction of the costs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM &#187; JPG, IMified, FeedCrier &#38; other morning bits</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65254</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM &#187; JPG, IMified, FeedCrier &#38; other morning bits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65254</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Publishing, a shining example of my iCompany concept, and publishers of JPG magazine, is going through an upheaval. Derek Powazek has [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Publishing, a shining example of my iCompany concept, and publishers of JPG magazine, is going through an upheaval. Derek Powazek has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65253</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65253</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;who pays $15 for these magazines? seriously who?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who pays $15 for these magazines? seriously who?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Powazek</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65252</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Powazek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65252</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the nice writup, Om!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hi there, y'all. I'm Derek from JPG &#38; 8020. Just wanted to mention that JPG was printed on demand by the nice folks at Lulu for the first 2 years of its life, and back issues 1-6 are still available there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But starting with our next issue, we're going to be printed by a traditional offset printing company, distributed coast to coast, and on sale in a store (hopefully) near you for the low low price of $5.99.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know! We're excited too. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice writup, Om!</p>
<p>Hi there, y&#8217;all. I&#8217;m Derek from JPG &amp; 8020. Just wanted to mention that JPG was printed on demand by the nice folks at Lulu for the first 2 years of its life, and back issues 1-6 are still available there.</p>
<p>But starting with our next issue, we&#8217;re going to be printed by a traditional offset printing company, distributed coast to coast, and on sale in a store (hopefully) near you for the low low price of $5.99.</p>
<p>I know! We&#8217;re excited too. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shuki Haiminis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65251</link>
		<dc:creator>Shuki Haiminis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65251</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Threadless is upto $60 million now?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Threadless is upto $60 million now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaveh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65250</link>
		<dc:creator>kaveh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65250</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OK, the 'Oops' issue (issue #6) sells for $15.99 on their site. I am going to pick up a copy to see if it's worth the dollars. Personally, I don't care where the photos come from, if the mag is very well put together and themes well-executed, issue after issue.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Are these the guys to pull this off? Why wouldn't established photo magz be able to do the same?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, the &#8216;Oops&#8217; issue (issue #6) sells for $15.99 on their site. I am going to pick up a copy to see if it&#8217;s worth the dollars. Personally, I don&#8217;t care where the photos come from, if the mag is very well put together and themes well-executed, issue after issue.</p>
<p>Are these the guys to pull this off? Why wouldn&#8217;t established photo magz be able to do the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaveh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65249</link>
		<dc:creator>kaveh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65249</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, this is not UGC, but would still work, if the publisher is not too greedy. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;$100 and a free one-year sub for photgs that get published: hmm, what about my 2nd, 3rd, &#8230; photos? Not sure how the mag is going to be priced, but it better be lower than the very well put together Irish photo mag, Source. Source is an affordable (less than $8, in Seattle), high quality photo mag available in special magazine stores.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, this is not UGC, but would still work, if the publisher is not too greedy. </p>
<p>$100 and a free one-year sub for photgs that get published: hmm, what about my 2nd, 3rd, &#8230; photos? Not sure how the mag is going to be priced, but it better be lower than the very well put together Irish photo mag, Source. Source is an affordable (less than $8, in Seattle), high quality photo mag available in special magazine stores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laughing Squid</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65248</link>
		<dc:creator>Laughing Squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65248</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;JPG Magazine&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Two years ago my good friends Derek Powazek and Heather Powazek Champ launched JPG Magazine, a new kind of publication where photographers who fall between &#8220;amateur&#8221; and &#8220;professional&#8221; can submit photos based on a theme, which &#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>JPG Magazine&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Two years ago my good friends Derek Powazek and Heather Powazek Champ launched JPG Magazine, a new kind of publication where photographers who fall between &#8220;amateur&#8221; and &#8220;professional&#8221; can submit photos based on a theme, which &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Aman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65247</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Aman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65247</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds vaguely similar to &lt;a href="http://www.dpchallenge.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;DPChallenge&lt;/a&gt;.  Except that I tend to think DPChallenge's ribbon winners will tend to be better than JPG's published photos.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds vaguely similar to <a href="http://www.dpchallenge.com/" rel="nofollow">DPChallenge</a>.  Except that I tend to think DPChallenge&#8217;s ribbon winners will tend to be better than JPG&#8217;s published photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajAT</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65246</link>
		<dc:creator>rajAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/18/8020-american-idol-of-digital-photography/#comment-65246</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is nt at all UGC. They hve just built a website where seasoned photographers can get votes on their work and get printed. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nt sure how much of a success it will be. These gnerally are blockbuster (think long tail)kind of images and only few photographers got the capability to produce them. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Generally the fat belly ( thank young ) are the pictures which hve been taken by amateurs and in situations where professionals wont be carrying their sleek equipment.
Plus the sheer no. pics makes it work as odds are highly against an individual pic.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nt at all UGC. They hve just built a website where seasoned photographers can get votes on their work and get printed. </p>
<p>Nt sure how much of a success it will be. These gnerally are blockbuster (think long tail)kind of images and only few photographers got the capability to produce them. </p>
<p>Generally the fat belly ( thank young ) are the pictures which hve been taken by amateurs and in situations where professionals wont be carrying their sleek equipment.<br />
Plus the sheer no. pics makes it work as odds are highly against an individual pic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
