<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Builds Brickhouse Around Talent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 01:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Top 25 Most Influential People in the Web Hosting Industry &#124; WHDb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-878507</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 25 Most Influential People in the Web Hosting Industry &#124; WHDb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-878507</guid>
		<description>[...] and she runs the Technology Development group at Yahoo!, known for its Hack Yahoo! program, and Brickhouse, a rapid development environment for new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and she runs the Technology Development group at Yahoo!, known for its Hack Yahoo! program, and Brickhouse, a rapid development environment for new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Yahoo Brickhouse, a KickStart, Zync &#38; a FireEagle &#171; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-648113</link>
		<dc:creator>From Yahoo Brickhouse, a KickStart, Zync &#38; a FireEagle &#171; GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 04:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-648113</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] by Om Malik  Sunday, November 4, 2007 at 9:00 PM PT &#124; No comments    It was almost a year ago when Yahoo (YHOO) set up Brickhouse, an effort to foster innovation within the company so that its [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Om Malik  Sunday, November 4, 2007 at 9:00 PM PT | No comments    It was almost a year ago when Yahoo (YHOO) set up Brickhouse, an effort to foster innovation within the company so that its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lunch 2.0 &#187; LunchCut - Lunch 2.0 @ JumpCut and Yahoo! Brickhouse in SF, baby!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-183017</link>
		<dc:creator>Lunch 2.0 &#187; LunchCut - Lunch 2.0 @ JumpCut and Yahoo! Brickhouse in SF, baby!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-183017</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] to jump in an extend us to dine with them at the notorious Yahoo! Brickhouse in San Francisco. (read and watch more about Y! [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to jump in an extend us to dine with them at the notorious Yahoo! Brickhouse in San Francisco. (read and watch more about Y! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Strategy by Jeremiah &#187; PodTech and San Jose Mercury News: Mainstream and Social can play together</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65202</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Strategy by Jeremiah &#187; PodTech and San Jose Mercury News: Mainstream and Social can play together</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65202</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] partner for weekly video show “Inside Silicon Valley”. Their first episode is at the Brickhouse, a new Yahoo funded incubator for [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] partner for weekly video show “Inside Silicon Valley”. Their first episode is at the Brickhouse, a new Yahoo funded incubator for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Software Abstractions Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65201</link>
		<dc:creator>The Software Abstractions Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 07:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65201</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Web 2.5: The Social Enterprise - Part II&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Software technology industry is curiously different from most other large industries, in the sense that large Enterprises in this space often lag behind small startups and even individuals in adopting cutting-edge technologies. It is hard to see th&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web 2.5: The Social Enterprise - Part II&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The Software technology industry is curiously different from most other large industries, in the sense that large Enterprises in this space often lag behind small startups and even individuals in adopting cutting-edge technologies. It is hard to see th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hashim</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65200</link>
		<dc:creator>Hashim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65200</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google also has a "founder's program" where a team can get a paid as if if they were "getting aquired" if they build an amazing project for Google.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google also has a &#8220;founder&#8217;s program&#8221; where a team can get a paid as if if they were &#8220;getting aquired&#8221; if they build an amazing project for Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Piner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65199</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Piner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 06:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65199</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yahoo hired  Dave Beckett over a year ago, whose contribution to the Semantic Web is immesurable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I see the big search engines in a Semantic Web war, as Google has R Guha, co-creator of RDF (Beckett has guided RDF for many years at W3C).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google Coop and Base are examples of "labeling information to be shared", a step towards it, perhaps..&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo hired  Dave Beckett over a year ago, whose contribution to the Semantic Web is immesurable.</p>
<p>I see the big search engines in a Semantic Web war, as Google has R Guha, co-creator of RDF (Beckett has guided RDF for many years at W3C).</p>
<p>Google Coop and Base are examples of &#8220;labeling information to be shared&#8221;, a step towards it, perhaps..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdPulp</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65198</link>
		<dc:creator>AdPulp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65198</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;She's Mighty Mighty, Just Lettin' It All Hang Out&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Senior decision makers at Yahoo appear to have a thing for old Commodores songs. Liz Gannes, a staff writer for GigaOM has this scoop for us: Yahoo is in the process of setting up an in-house incubator in an attempt&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>She&#8217;s Mighty Mighty, Just Lettin&#8217; It All Hang Out&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Senior decision makers at Yahoo appear to have a thing for old Commodores songs. Liz Gannes, a staff writer for GigaOM has this scoop for us: Yahoo is in the process of setting up an in-house incubator in an attempt&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Performance &#38; Talent Management Blog</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65197</link>
		<dc:creator>The Performance &#38; Talent Management Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65197</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Creatively retaining talent&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;GigaOm highlights Yahoo&#8217;s new attempt at retaining top talent. Called Brickhouse, the project is essentially an in-house incubator meant to give it&#8217;s entrepreneurial employees another reason to stick with the company. Not altogether differe&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Creatively retaining talent&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>GigaOm highlights Yahoo&rsquo;s new attempt at retaining top talent. Called Brickhouse, the project is essentially an in-house incubator meant to give it&rsquo;s entrepreneurial employees another reason to stick with the company. Not altogether differe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Hunkins</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65196</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Hunkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65196</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps a good plan but I wonder if innovative brilliance is best nurtured in a freewheeling, experimental, small business market where millions of ideas are whittled down to thousands of "good ideas" which are then tested to reveal a few "great ideas" that can yield a viable business?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a good plan but I wonder if innovative brilliance is best nurtured in a freewheeling, experimental, small business market where millions of ideas are whittled down to thousands of &#8220;good ideas&#8221; which are then tested to reveal a few &#8220;great ideas&#8221; that can yield a viable business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lord</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65195</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65195</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Go Caterina go. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Most innovators would much prefer the relatively low risk/reward and abundant resources of a large company given an earnest opportunity to pursue Christensen-esque disruptive innovation. Few innovators are adept, deliberate or even willful entrepreneurs, rather they are beholden to do-it-themselves in absence of a pragmatic alternative.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Go go go!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disruptive_innovation&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Caterina go. </p>
<p>Most innovators would much prefer the relatively low risk/reward and abundant resources of a large company given an earnest opportunity to pursue Christensen-esque disruptive innovation. Few innovators are adept, deliberate or even willful entrepreneurs, rather they are beholden to do-it-themselves in absence of a pragmatic alternative.  </p>
<p>Go go go!</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disruptive_innovation" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disruptive_innovation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eas</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65194</link>
		<dc:creator>eas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65194</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I've come to beleive that the best way to deal with this is to let the people go, maybe even give them a small amount of funding in exchange for a piece of the venture and an open channel of communication.  If they end up doing something else great that fits with the motherships business, the mothership can acquire it.  Everyone wins.  The entrepreneur and any other investors get a payday, and the mothership gets a known quantity, rather than a promise.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve come to beleive that the best way to deal with this is to let the people go, maybe even give them a small amount of funding in exchange for a piece of the venture and an open channel of communication.  If they end up doing something else great that fits with the motherships business, the mothership can acquire it.  Everyone wins.  The entrepreneur and any other investors get a payday, and the mothership gets a known quantity, rather than a promise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65193</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65193</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I always think its funny the way big companies and VC's think the entrepreneur behind a successful web start up are the genius behind the next big idea.  Look. Rose did digg, it's awesome and everyone loves it.  It's not the next NYTimes and he isn't the second coming of bill gates or steve jobs.  He had a cool idea and built it.  Same thing with Fake.  Everyone loves Flikr, nice job.  But don't expect her to come up with the next Flikr, she already did that.  Anyway, it's like Hollywood making sequels, they are never as good as the original and somehow cheapen the whole first.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always think its funny the way big companies and VC&#8217;s think the entrepreneur behind a successful web start up are the genius behind the next big idea.  Look. Rose did digg, it&#8217;s awesome and everyone loves it.  It&#8217;s not the next NYTimes and he isn&#8217;t the second coming of bill gates or steve jobs.  He had a cool idea and built it.  Same thing with Fake.  Everyone loves Flikr, nice job.  But don&#8217;t expect her to come up with the next Flikr, she already did that.  Anyway, it&#8217;s like Hollywood making sequels, they are never as good as the original and somehow cheapen the whole first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinod</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65192</link>
		<dc:creator>vinod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65192</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;the real bottom line issues -  $$$ / comp / payola. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;for a truly hot idea, Yahoo won't be able to pay these guys anywhere near what they'd make externally.   Why stay?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;for a mediocre idea, well, what's the point.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;while incubating an idea - angel funding + an ok paycheck while exploring isn't too hard to come by these days.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's hard to truly square the circle here.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the real bottom line issues -  $$$ / comp / payola. </p>
<p>for a truly hot idea, Yahoo won&#8217;t be able to pay these guys anywhere near what they&#8217;d make externally.   Why stay?</p>
<p>for a mediocre idea, well, what&#8217;s the point.</p>
<p>while incubating an idea - angel funding + an ok paycheck while exploring isn&#8217;t too hard to come by these days.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to truly square the circle here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65191</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65191</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They were a bad idea during the first bubble and they'll be a bad idea during this one.  Why would you try and hold onto someone who created a nifty little site but clearly doesn't have big company dna?  Other people can be just as creative, but they didn't have the luck of being unemployed in 2001 and able to code AJAX.  The tech industry is whacked.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were a bad idea during the first bubble and they&#8217;ll be a bad idea during this one.  Why would you try and hold onto someone who created a nifty little site but clearly doesn&#8217;t have big company dna?  Other people can be just as creative, but they didn&#8217;t have the luck of being unemployed in 2001 and able to code AJAX.  The tech industry is whacked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petabro</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65190</link>
		<dc:creator>Petabro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 12:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/15/yahoo-brickhouse/#comment-65190</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Most of the companies that were "incubated" in the past were "aborted"
This time it is different?
Where have you gone Terry Semel?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the companies that were &#8220;incubated&#8221; in the past were &#8220;aborted&#8221;<br />
This time it is different?<br />
Where have you gone Terry Semel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
