<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg that Fat Belly!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:35:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aunts on Facebook: The New Core Users of the Social Web &#8211; GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aunts on Facebook: The New Core Users of the Social Web &#8211; GigaOM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Robert Young were part of a blogosphere discussion about the &#8220;80-19-1 Rule&#8221; and &#8220;the Fat Belly.&#8221; The idea was that between core elite contributors (thought to be a very small sliver [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Robert Young were part of a blogosphere discussion about the &#8220;80-19-1 Rule&#8221; and &#8220;the Fat Belly.&#8221; The idea was that between core elite contributors (thought to be a very small sliver [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo BOSSes Its Way Into Long Tail of Search &#171; Life in the San Francisco Startup Lane</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yahoo BOSSes Its Way Into Long Tail of Search &#171; Life in the San Francisco Startup Lane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] more &#8220;vertical search&#8221; aggregators ofttimes rich in metadata dominate the fat middle (fat belly?)&#8211; and I bet they will continue to do so. Possibly related posts: (automatically [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more &#8220;vertical search&#8221; aggregators ofttimes rich in metadata dominate the fat middle (fat belly?)&#8211; and I bet they will continue to do so. Possibly related posts: (automatically [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Bond</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123495</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian Bond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I guess great minds think alike. Do a Google search for &quot;The Fat Middle&quot; and you&#039;ll find the 3rd entry is
http://www.voidstar.com/node.php?id=2664 Dated 14-Feb-06
Feel free to send the usual royalty cheque! ;-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I agree. The Fat Middle is where all the interesting stuff happens, in the middle of the greatest volatility. It&#039;s constantly boiling with rising stars emerging from the Long Tail and fading stars from The Short Head.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess great minds think alike. Do a Google search for &#8220;The Fat Middle&#8221; and you&#8217;ll find the 3rd entry is<br />
<a href="http://www.voidstar.com/node.php?id=2664" rel="nofollow">http://www.voidstar.com/node.php?id=2664</a> Dated 14-Feb-06<br />
Feel free to send the usual royalty cheque! ;-)</p>
<p>Anyway, I agree. The Fat Middle is where all the interesting stuff happens, in the middle of the greatest volatility. It&#8217;s constantly boiling with rising stars emerging from the Long Tail and fading stars from The Short Head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s my problem with all this &quot;democratization of content&quot; BS.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cost to post or write an article: ZERO&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cost to record a song with a few of your friends: A few beers and pizzas and a PC or Mac&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cost to record a quality song: Soundproof room, good mics, etc - maybe $750-1500 - cheap, but not free&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cost to shoot &amp; produce a tv show or an episode or pilot of a show: If independent, still between $20k at the low end, and $6 million at the hight end.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Even $20,000 is a LOT of money.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And the long tail ain&#039;t gonna cut it even for small investors/investments to work in this media space unless the market changes into a place where a distrib orders up digital distribution rights for a property and &quot;buys&quot; UPFRONT a certain number of downloads or streams so the content producer can recoup enough $$ so they can make more.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s just no way to compare some fat kid with their video camera to a real film or video storyteller who&#039;s developed their craft through a lot of experience and hard work.  Once in a while there will be a break out, but most of the sh*t, will be just that.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my problem with all this &#8220;democratization of content&#8221; BS.</p>
<p>Cost to post or write an article: ZERO</p>
<p>Cost to record a song with a few of your friends: A few beers and pizzas and a PC or Mac</p>
<p>Cost to record a quality song: Soundproof room, good mics, etc &#8211; maybe $750-1500 &#8211; cheap, but not free</p>
<p>Cost to shoot &amp; produce a tv show or an episode or pilot of a show: If independent, still between $20k at the low end, and $6 million at the hight end.  </p>
<p>Even $20,000 is a LOT of money.  </p>
<p>And the long tail ain&#8217;t gonna cut it even for small investors/investments to work in this media space unless the market changes into a place where a distrib orders up digital distribution rights for a property and &#8220;buys&#8221; UPFRONT a certain number of downloads or streams so the content producer can recoup enough $$ so they can make more.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s just no way to compare some fat kid with their video camera to a real film or video storyteller who&#8217;s developed their craft through a lot of experience and hard work.  Once in a while there will be a break out, but most of the sh*t, will be just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitin Borwankar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitin Borwankar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi Robert,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You may want to take a look at another take on the &quot;fat belly&quot; this time with some empirical data based on recommendation systems, in a recentpost on my blog, Tagschema.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://tagschema.com/blogs/tagschema/2006/10/putting-folk-back-in-folksonomy.html&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert,</p>
<p>You may want to take a look at another take on the &#8220;fat belly&#8221; this time with some empirical data based on recommendation systems, in a recentpost on my blog, Tagschema.</p>
<p><a href="http://tagschema.com/blogs/tagschema/2006/10/putting-folk-back-in-folksonomy.html" rel="nofollow">http://tagschema.com/blogs/tagschema/2006/10/putting-folk-back-in-folksonomy.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBizofCoding</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheBizofCoding]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chris Anderson and The Fat Belly&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I found this engaging write-up on Giga OM by Robert Young that builds-upon&#160;the idea of the Long Tail as described by Chris Anderson. &#160;Chris Anderson has talked about the long tail and the &#8220;big head&#8221;. Robert Young, a serial entrepr&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Chris Anderson and The Fat Belly&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found this engaging write-up on Giga OM by Robert Young that builds-upon&nbsp;the idea of the Long Tail as described by Chris Anderson. &nbsp;Chris Anderson has talked about the long tail and the &ldquo;big head&rdquo;. Robert Young, a serial entrepr&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Ferrara.sellsius</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Ferrara.sellsius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 00:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;What I take from this excellent post is support for Pareto&#039;s Principle, i.e, that regardless of what you call the other parts, the Long Tail is only 20% of a total given market.  Your digg vote stats support this conclusion.  Thus, a long tail marketing strategy is better suited to a large market---in a small market the long tail is just not worth chasing, especially not exclusively.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some questions if anyone cares to answer:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Is there any agreement as to where the Long Tail starts? (Prof M. Smith says no)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Did 40% of Amazon&#039;s sales in the study come from Affiliates?  If so, is Long Affiliates  just as valid a theory of their success?  &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Did Wal-Mart sell more music CDs than anyone, despite the fact they have a limited inventory &amp; are not long tail sellers?  If so, would this be further support of the Long Affiliates theory.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Can&#039;t Netflix&#039;s success be attributed to it being a First Mover? &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for any answers.
Our take on the long tail below:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/?p=1334
(How Much Does The Long Tail Weigh)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/?p=1348
(How Much Does The Long Tail Weigh: Part Deux)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I take from this excellent post is support for Pareto&#8217;s Principle, i.e, that regardless of what you call the other parts, the Long Tail is only 20% of a total given market.  Your digg vote stats support this conclusion.  Thus, a long tail marketing strategy is better suited to a large market&#8212;in a small market the long tail is just not worth chasing, especially not exclusively.  </p>
<p>Some questions if anyone cares to answer:</p>
<ol>
<li>Is there any agreement as to where the Long Tail starts? (Prof M. Smith says no)</li>
<li>Did 40% of Amazon&#8217;s sales in the study come from Affiliates?  If so, is Long Affiliates  just as valid a theory of their success?  </li>
<li>Did Wal-Mart sell more music CDs than anyone, despite the fact they have a limited inventory &amp; are not long tail sellers?  If so, would this be further support of the Long Affiliates theory.</li>
<li>Can&#8217;t Netflix&#8217;s success be attributed to it being a First Mover? </li>
</ol>
<p>Thanks for any answers.<br />
Our take on the long tail below:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/?p=1334" rel="nofollow">http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/?p=1334</a><br />
(How Much Does The Long Tail Weigh)</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/?p=1348" rel="nofollow">http://blog.sellsiusrealestate.com/?p=1348</a><br />
(How Much Does The Long Tail Weigh: Part Deux)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 05:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Great article, though the naming of the middle of the curve gets the wrong shape as other have already beaten like a dead horse.  I am happily wsurprised to see an article about the middle class written by someone in the upper class of the blogosphere.  Been slumming it?  :)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, though the naming of the middle of the curve gets the wrong shape as other have already beaten like a dead horse.  I am happily wsurprised to see an article about the middle class written by someone in the upper class of the blogosphere.  Been slumming it?  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoulCast</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SoulCast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Very nice piece.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Reminds me of case studies at Haas.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice piece.</p>
<p>Reminds me of case studies at Haas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nguyen The Tan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nguyen The Tan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/09/04/digg-that-fat-belly/#comment-123488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Creators, Synthesizers, and Consumers
By  Bradley Horowitz&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.elatable.com/blog/?p=5&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The levels in the pyramid represent phases of value creation.  As an example take Yahoo! Groups.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;* 1% of the user population might start a group (or a thread within a group)
* 10% of the user population might participate actively, and actually author content whether starting a thread or responding to a thread-in-progress
* 100% of the user population benefits from the activities of the above groups (lurkers)
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creators, Synthesizers, and Consumers<br />
By  Bradley Horowitz</p>
<p><a href="http://www.elatable.com/blog/?p=5" rel="nofollow">http://www.elatable.com/blog/?p=5</a></p>
<p>The levels in the pyramid represent phases of value creation.  As an example take Yahoo! Groups.</p>
<pre><code>* 1% of the user population might start a group (or a thread within a group)
* 10% of the user population might participate actively, and actually author content whether starting a thread or responding to a thread-in-progress
* 100% of the user population benefits from the activities of the above groups (lurkers)
</code></pre>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
