<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco Place &amp; Time Shifts With Arroyo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/08/22/cisco-place-time-shifts-with-arroyo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/08/22/cisco-place-time-shifts-with-arroyo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:40:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/08/22/cisco-place-time-shifts-with-arroyo/#comment-122787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/08/22/cisco-place-time-shifts-with-arroyo/#comment-122787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Cisco lacks a smart content capture, manage, brand and package solution.
When the time comes to distribute assets to a dozen different technologies with unique distribution specs and branding requirements, an essential survival characteristic in a pull versus push media universe, they&#039;re going to find that no encode/transcode provider has a solution.
But I do.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cisco lacks a smart content capture, manage, brand and package solution.<br />
When the time comes to distribute assets to a dozen different technologies with unique distribution specs and branding requirements, an essential survival characteristic in a pull versus push media universe, they&#8217;re going to find that no encode/transcode provider has a solution.<br />
But I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Bradshaw</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/08/22/cisco-place-time-shifts-with-arroyo/#comment-122786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Bradshaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/08/22/cisco-place-time-shifts-with-arroyo/#comment-122786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Surely the next acquisition for Cisco has got to be the &quot;screen&quot; it doesn&#039;t quite have a handle on: mobiles. It&#039;s got access to TVs and PCs already, so why not splash out on Palm now it isn&#039;t lumbered with the software division? It&#039;d piss off Microsoft too, which whatever Cisco says has been a key angle to many of its recent launches, notably unified communications.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the next acquisition for Cisco has got to be the &#8220;screen&#8221; it doesn&#8217;t quite have a handle on: mobiles. It&#8217;s got access to TVs and PCs already, so why not splash out on Palm now it isn&#8217;t lumbered with the software division? It&#8217;d piss off Microsoft too, which whatever Cisco says has been a key angle to many of its recent launches, notably unified communications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

