Comments on: Zapr Joins The P-P2P Party http://gigaom.com/2006/08/21/zapr-joins-the-p-p2p-party/ Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:24:41 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Ken Rossi : CivilNetizen.com http://gigaom.com/2006/08/21/zapr-joins-the-p-p2p-party/#comment-60185 Ken Rossi : CivilNetizen.com Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:46:03 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/zapr-joins-the-p-p2p-party/#comment-60185 <p>Hi Om,</p> <p>Thanks for the mention about Netizen. The p2p personal file sharing market is moving at a rapid pace. We've been working on lots of cool new features as well and would love to share them with you at some point. </p> <p>Thanks, Ken</p> Hi Om,

Thanks for the mention about Netizen. The p2p personal file sharing market is moving at a rapid pace. We’ve been working on lots of cool new features as well and would love to share them with you at some point.

Thanks, Ken

]]> By: Mick http://gigaom.com/2006/08/21/zapr-joins-the-p-p2p-party/#comment-60184 Mick Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:22:54 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/zapr-joins-the-p-p2p-party/#comment-60184 <p>Hey Om, hi Ash. </p> <p>Zapr is just trying to be a really simple and straight forward utility to increase your sharing options. Early days and we appreciate the feedback.</p> <p>Cheers.</p> <p>Mick</p> Hey Om, hi Ash.

Zapr is just trying to be a really simple and straight forward utility to increase your sharing options. Early days and we appreciate the feedback.

Cheers.

Mick

]]> By: Ash Maurya http://gigaom.com/2006/08/21/zapr-joins-the-p-p2p-party/#comment-60183 Ash Maurya Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:03:10 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/zapr-joins-the-p-p2p-party/#comment-60183 <p>Hi Om - </p> <p>I would classify Zapr and BoxCloud (WiredReach) as "peer to web" services versus "peer to peer" as there is no peer application client on the other end - just a browser. </p> <p>Also, not sure what Zapr's take is, but we see BoxCloud more as a collaboration application (with branding, comments, tags, etc.) than just a file transfer service - allowing users to keep their content local while being able to selectively share with clients and coworkers. </p> <p>Cheers,</p> <p>Ash</p> Hi Om –

I would classify Zapr and BoxCloud (WiredReach) as “peer to web” services versus “peer to peer” as there is no peer application client on the other end – just a browser.

Also, not sure what Zapr’s take is, but we see BoxCloud more as a collaboration application (with branding, comments, tags, etc.) than just a file transfer service – allowing users to keep their content local while being able to selectively share with clients and coworkers.

Cheers,

Ash

]]>