Comments on: Zapr Joins The P-P2P Party http://gigaom.com/2006/08/21/zapr-joins-the-p-p2p-party/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:08:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Ken Rossi : CivilNetizen.com http://gigaom.com/2006/08/21/zapr-joins-the-p-p2p-party/#comment-122760 Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:46:03 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/zapr-joins-the-p-p2p-party/#comment-122760 Hi Om,

Thanks for the mention about Netizen. The p2p personal file sharing market is moving at a rapid pace. We’ve been working on lots of cool new features as well and would love to share them with you at some point.

Thanks,
Ken

]]> By: Mick http://gigaom.com/2006/08/21/zapr-joins-the-p-p2p-party/#comment-122759 Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:22:54 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/zapr-joins-the-p-p2p-party/#comment-122759 Hey Om, hi Ash.

Zapr is just trying to be a really simple and straight forward utility to increase your sharing options. Early days and we appreciate the feedback.

Cheers.

Mick

]]> By: Ash Maurya http://gigaom.com/2006/08/21/zapr-joins-the-p-p2p-party/#comment-122758 Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:03:10 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/zapr-joins-the-p-p2p-party/#comment-122758 Hi Om –

I would classify Zapr and BoxCloud (WiredReach) as “peer to web” services versus “peer to peer” as there is no peer application client on the other end – just a browser.

Also, not sure what Zapr’s take is, but we see BoxCloud more as a collaboration application (with branding, comments, tags, etc.) than just a file transfer service – allowing users to keep their content local while being able to selectively share with clients and coworkers.

Cheers,

Ash

]]>