<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InterNAPPing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/08/17/internapping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/08/17/internapping/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:47:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael T. Halligan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/08/17/internapping/#comment-122473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael T. Halligan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/internapping/#comment-122473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;If this had happened to a large ISP, it would be concerning. However, InterNAP isn&#039;t really an ISP so much as they are a large bandwidth aggregator.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At any carrer hotel you go to, you&#039;ll find a number of small bandwidth aggregators. The model is they&#039;ll usually carry one or two &quot;Tier 1&quot; (a term that is relatively meaningless anymore) like UUNet or Level3 providers, and then some lower-end providers like Wiltel or Cogent.  They&#039;ll setup BGP, and resell their mix of bandwidth. This is what Internap does, but in a much larger scale.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Internap&#039;s model is such that they are in dozens of different carrier-neutral datacenters, reselling all of the &quot;high-end&quot; IP providers that serve that facility. Each datacenter, or in Internap&#039;s lingo, PNAP, is a separate Autonomous System. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Internap registers a separate ASn (Autonomous Systems Number) from each datacenter. This limits the impact on their global customer base. A power-outage at One Wilshire might affect all of their LA customers, but none of their Ashburn  customers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The real problem, is the skyrocketing costs of real estate and IP transit at west coast datacenters. For the most part, the power infrastructures of these carrier hotels are over provisioned, and under maintained. The mentality of modern datacenter providers could be likened to that of a used-car salesman, or a slumlord. Very little thought is put into their customer&#039;s needs in two years, instead all focus is set on meeting today&#039;s sales quotas.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lesson? No different. Build your infrastructure over multiple datacenters, which have diverse, non-shared infrastructures for power and connectivity.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this had happened to a large ISP, it would be concerning. However, InterNAP isn&#8217;t really an ISP so much as they are a large bandwidth aggregator.</p>
<p>At any carrer hotel you go to, you&#8217;ll find a number of small bandwidth aggregators. The model is they&#8217;ll usually carry one or two &#8220;Tier 1&#8243; (a term that is relatively meaningless anymore) like UUNet or Level3 providers, and then some lower-end providers like Wiltel or Cogent.  They&#8217;ll setup BGP, and resell their mix of bandwidth. This is what Internap does, but in a much larger scale.</p>
<p>Internap&#8217;s model is such that they are in dozens of different carrier-neutral datacenters, reselling all of the &#8220;high-end&#8221; IP providers that serve that facility. Each datacenter, or in Internap&#8217;s lingo, PNAP, is a separate Autonomous System. </p>
<p>Internap registers a separate ASn (Autonomous Systems Number) from each datacenter. This limits the impact on their global customer base. A power-outage at One Wilshire might affect all of their LA customers, but none of their Ashburn  customers.</p>
<p>The real problem, is the skyrocketing costs of real estate and IP transit at west coast datacenters. For the most part, the power infrastructures of these carrier hotels are over provisioned, and under maintained. The mentality of modern datacenter providers could be likened to that of a used-car salesman, or a slumlord. Very little thought is put into their customer&#8217;s needs in two years, instead all focus is set on meeting today&#8217;s sales quotas.</p>
<p>Lesson? No different. Build your infrastructure over multiple datacenters, which have diverse, non-shared infrastructures for power and connectivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Aman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/08/17/internapping/#comment-122472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Aman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/internapping/#comment-122472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Fragility?  IMHO, if anything, it merely exposes expectations of uptime that are too high.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fragility?  IMHO, if anything, it merely exposes expectations of uptime that are too high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/08/17/internapping/#comment-122471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/internapping/#comment-122471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;There are plenty it all depends in what you are looking for and where. If you are looking for cheap dedicated servers then look at:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;www.softlayer.com
www.voxrox.com
www.steadfast.net&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you are looking for enterprise class hosting check out:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;www.rackspace.com
www.datapipe.com
www.savvis.net&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you are looking for great colocation:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;www.colo4dallas.com
www.choopa.net&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For carrier-neutral dc&#039;s you&#039;ll need to find the ones in your area.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are plenty it all depends in what you are looking for and where. If you are looking for cheap dedicated servers then look at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.softlayer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.softlayer.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.voxrox.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.voxrox.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.steadfast.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.steadfast.net</a></p>
<p>If you are looking for enterprise class hosting check out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rackspace.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rackspace.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.datapipe.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.datapipe.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.savvis.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.savvis.net</a></p>
<p>If you are looking for great colocation:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.colo4dallas.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.colo4dallas.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.choopa.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.choopa.net</a></p>
<p>For carrier-neutral dc&#8217;s you&#8217;ll need to find the ones in your area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/08/17/internapping/#comment-122470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/internapping/#comment-122470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Apart from Equinix, what are the other options? Are there any enterprise class data centers out there?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apart from Equinix, what are the other options? Are there any enterprise class data centers out there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InterNAP User</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/08/17/internapping/#comment-122469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[InterNAP User]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/08/17/internapping/#comment-122469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;So, the above market prices I pay for bandwidth and &quot;route optimization&quot; will not do me any good when the lights go out?  Seems like for the more than 2X price I pay for bandwidth I should get a better hosting facility!  Equinix anyone?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, the above market prices I pay for bandwidth and &#8220;route optimization&#8221; will not do me any good when the lights go out?  Seems like for the more than 2X price I pay for bandwidth I should get a better hosting facility!  Equinix anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

