Comments on: Field Notes From The GooglePlex http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/ Tracking the Internet Evolution Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:08:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU By: Philipp Lenssen http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58746 Philipp Lenssen Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:49:50 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58746 <blockquote> <p>"In 2003, we used to crawl the web once a month, and now we update everything in two to three days."</p> </blockquote> <p>Matt Cutts says: "Just to be clear, I don't think I said that the entire index is updated every 2-3 days, but if I did then I misspoke. It's true that when an event happens on the web, our index can often pick it up in 1-2 days, and usually even faster. But a typical page in Google's main web index is updated every 2-3 weeks or faster; it’s not the case that the entire main web index is updated every 2-3 days." http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2006-07-26.html#n28</p>

“In 2003, we used to crawl the web
once a month, and now we update
everything in two to three days.”

Matt Cutts says:
“Just to be clear, I don’t think I said that the entire index is updated every 2-3 days, but if I did then I misspoke. It’s true that when an event happens on the web, our index can often pick it up in 1-2 days, and usually even faster. But a typical page in Google’s main web index is updated every 2-3 weeks or faster; it’s not the case that the entire main web index is updated every 2-3 days.”
http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2006-07-26.html#n28

]]> By: Jason Schramm http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58745 Jason Schramm Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:58:09 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58745 <p>An interesting article. Nothing new to report, but I enjoyed your relaxed and thoughtful writing style.</p> An interesting article. Nothing new to report, but I enjoyed your relaxed and thoughtful writing style.

]]> By: Amit Agarwal http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58744 Amit Agarwal Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:25:47 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58744 <p>..what is the translation? Better late than never.</p> <p>Om - did you shoot any pictures inside Googleplex ? How about sharing them here.</p> ..what is the translation? Better late than never.

Om - did you shoot any pictures inside Googleplex ? How about sharing them here.

]]> By: Anonymous http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58743 Anonymous Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:59:42 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58743 <p>"daar aye, daroost aye"</p> <p>what is the translation? This is all i could come up with.</p> <p>"box of pain , sorrow as far as the eye can see"</p> <p>lol Sounds like a kwisatz haderach kinda thing.</p> “daar aye, daroost aye”

what is the translation?
This is all i could come up with.

“box of pain , sorrow as far as the eye can see”

lol
Sounds like a kwisatz haderach kinda thing.

]]> By: Om Malik http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58742 Om Malik Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:32:54 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58742 <p>harvital, as they say back in delhi… daar aye, daroost aye…</p> <p>actually if you read my previous posts on google, you know i have been saying just that for nearly two years,</p> harvital, as they say back in delhi… daar aye, daroost aye…

actually if you read my previous posts on google, you know i have been saying just that for nearly two years,

]]> By: Harvitpal Arora http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58741 Harvitpal Arora Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:50:23 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58741 <p>Congrats Om, you finaly figured it out! Anyone with a head would have told you this realisation you have reached well over a year ago. Dude get it right!</p> Congrats Om, you finaly figured it out!
Anyone with a head would have told you this realisation you have reached well over a year ago.
Dude get it right!

]]> By: skibare http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58740 skibare Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:57:09 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58740 <p>5,900,000 Pages when you GOOGLE """OM Malik''' Om, you are the GOD!!!! Maybe Jangl should have named their new product ''Om'' Skibare</p> 5,900,000 Pages when you GOOGLE “”"OM Malik”’
Om, you are the GOD!!!! Maybe Jangl should have named their new product ”Om”
Skibare

]]> By: /pd http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58739 /pd Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:11:53 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58739 <p>Om, next time you get you hands on any google candy and <a href="http://www.googlestore.com/product.asp?catid=2&code=GO40038" rel="nofollow">gum </a> ?? :)-</p> Om, next time you get you hands on any google candy and gum ?? :)-

]]> By: Randhir Reddy http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58738 Randhir Reddy Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:10:54 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58738 <p>waiting for more on the Googleplex expedition om.</p> waiting for more on the Googleplex expedition om.

]]> By: Mobile Reviewer http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58737 Mobile Reviewer Wed, 26 Jul 2006 06:33:48 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58737 <p>"He explained that if you spend $1,000 on the Google ad network, Google Checkout would process $10,000 worth" - seems like a marketing to attract sellers from paypal.</p> “He explained that if you spend $1,000 on the Google ad network, Google Checkout would process $10,000 worth” - seems like a marketing to attract sellers from paypal.

]]> By: Otis Gospodnetic http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58736 Otis Gospodnetic Wed, 26 Jul 2006 03:33:32 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58736 <p>You mean it's not about organizing the world's information (any more)? ;)</p> You mean it’s not about organizing the world’s information (any more)? ;)

]]> By: Glen http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58735 Glen Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:52:16 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58735 <p>How does Google's inability to execute on any except for search and gmail impact your view of the company? Search is an amazing cash cow. But if they are going to "dominate computing" and truly "organize the world's information" the execution needs to improve by an order of magnitude.</p> How does Google’s inability to execute on any except for search and gmail impact your view of the company? Search is an amazing cash cow. But if they are going to “dominate computing” and truly “organize the world’s information” the execution needs to improve by an order of magnitude.

]]> By: Christian J. Koch http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58734 Christian J. Koch Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:10:52 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58734 <p>I was just going to comment on the google links to yahoo finance..at least use google finance after an awesome article about them! cmon!</p> I was just going to comment on the google links to yahoo finance..at least use google finance after an awesome article about them! cmon!

]]> By: Aswath http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58733 Aswath Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:30:59 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58733 <p>Then is it a valid corollary that Google will prefer that we GTalk via GMail browser window rather than the standalone GTalk client? Related to the previous post, did you get their reaction?</p> Then is it a valid corollary that Google will prefer that we GTalk via GMail browser window rather than the standalone GTalk client? Related to the previous post, did you get their reaction?

]]> By: Om Malik http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58732 Om Malik Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:30:12 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58732 <p>MK, it seems the problem is fixed. just letting you know.</p> MK, it seems the problem is fixed. just letting you know.

]]> By: Om Malik http://gigaom.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58731 Om Malik Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:29:54 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/25/field-notes-from-the-googleplex/#comment-58731 <p>Mark, </p> <p>I agree, it is an interesting company to observe and see. i will be following up with more information later.</p> Mark,

I agree, it is an interesting company to observe and see. i will be following up with more information later.

]]>