<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moto, Chasing Nokia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:58:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/#comment-58086</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/#comment-58086</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, Nokia has Yahoo Go support now, vs. 2H07 for Motorola. As for Motorola and high end phones: The so-called Ultimate Media RAZR is about the most advanced non-smart phone you can buy in the US. The CDMA version has got EVDO so it is definitely a 3G phone. There is also the Motorola Q smart-phone -- Windows Mobile 5.0. EVDO, and push e-mail. Clearly one&#039;s view of Nokia vs Motorola is shaped by whether they live in the US or not. Nokia is on the way out of the CDMA market and thus have a low profile with half of the US market. On the other hand Nokia is far stronger than Motorola in GSM and especially UMTS (which is still a non-issue in the US), so outside the US and the Far-East Nokia is rightly seen is the dominant player and Moto as a weak also ran.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Nokia has Yahoo Go support now, vs. 2H07 for Motorola. As for Motorola and high end phones: The so-called Ultimate Media RAZR is about the most advanced non-smart phone you can buy in the US. The CDMA version has got EVDO so it is definitely a 3G phone. There is also the Motorola Q smart-phone &#8212; Windows Mobile 5.0. EVDO, and push e-mail. Clearly one&#8217;s view of Nokia vs Motorola is shaped by whether they live in the US or not. Nokia is on the way out of the CDMA market and thus have a low profile with half of the US market. On the other hand Nokia is far stronger than Motorola in GSM and especially UMTS (which is still a non-issue in the US), so outside the US and the Far-East Nokia is rightly seen is the dominant player and Moto as a weak also ran.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick McQuilton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/#comment-58084</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick McQuilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/#comment-58084</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice earnings from Moto. Now if they could just see their way to better quality in their handsets (how about focusing on the newer, better charger interface) we wouldn&#039;t have to replace them every 18 months. Or maybe that&#039;s the idea.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice earnings from Moto. Now if they could just see their way to better quality in their handsets (how about focusing on the newer, better charger interface) we wouldn&#8217;t have to replace them every 18 months. Or maybe that&#8217;s the idea.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hughes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/#comment-58082</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/#comment-58082</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Motorola and &quot;high-end 3G phones&quot; isn&#039;t a combination I&#039;m aware of, they don&#039;t make any high-end phones, and their 3G range is very sparse, about all they&#039;re doing right now is new colours for the tired old low-end RAZR.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s only a limited market for chav-phones, Moto will be hitting that barrier hard very soon.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motorola and &#8220;high-end 3G phones&#8221; isn&#8217;t a combination I&#8217;m aware of, they don&#8217;t make any high-end phones, and their 3G range is very sparse, about all they&#8217;re doing right now is new colours for the tired old low-end RAZR.</p>

<p>There&#8217;s only a limited market for chav-phones, Moto will be hitting that barrier hard very soon.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prasanna</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/#comment-58080</link>
		<dc:creator>Prasanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 07:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/#comment-58080</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would like to point that Nokia is already advertising its N70 model here in India with Yahoo! Go. It seems they(Yahoo!) also have a partnership with Nokia.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to point that Nokia is already advertising its N70 model here in India with Yahoo! Go. It seems they(Yahoo!) also have a partnership with Nokia.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trib</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/#comment-58078</link>
		<dc:creator>Trib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/#comment-58078</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;It seems more like Motorola’s playing catch-up with this rather than gaining share on NOK.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Huh?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Om points out that Moto has closed the marketshare gap signifigantly (33.3% NOK, 22.2% MOT). Introducing a feature second into the marketplace has nothing to do with gaining market share. Besides&#8230;why would anyone want Yahoo on an ugly nokia phone when I can get it on a beautiful razr or pebl or slvr or Q??&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It seems more like Motorola’s playing catch-up with this rather than gaining share on NOK.&#8221;</p>

<p>Huh?</p>

<p>Om points out that Moto has closed the marketshare gap signifigantly (33.3% NOK, 22.2% MOT). Introducing a feature second into the marketplace has nothing to do with gaining market share. Besides&#8230;why would anyone want Yahoo on an ugly nokia phone when I can get it on a beautiful razr or pebl or slvr or Q??</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Day</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/#comment-58068</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/#comment-58068</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Concerning MOT&#039;s agreement to bundle &quot;Yahoo Go for Mobile&quot; on devices starting in 2007:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nokia already has a similar deal.  In fact, there&#039;s at least one Nokia handset available today from Cingular that includes the Yahoo bits.  It seems more like Motorola&#039;s playing catch-up with this rather than gaining share on NOK.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning MOT&#8217;s agreement to bundle &#8220;Yahoo Go for Mobile&#8221; on devices starting in 2007:</p>

<p>Nokia already has a similar deal.  In fact, there&#8217;s at least one Nokia handset available today from Cingular that includes the Yahoo bits.  It seems more like Motorola&#8217;s playing catch-up with this rather than gaining share on NOK.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/#comment-58066</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/motorola-nokia/#comment-58066</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder how MOT and Nokia are doing with regard to phones that also deal with push email, to compete with Blackberry? Sony-Ericsson has been delayed in releasing their push email phones if I&#039;m not mistaken and it would seem that the phone companies would want to offer phones that can attack the Blackberry market slice.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how MOT and Nokia are doing with regard to phones that also deal with push email, to compete with Blackberry? Sony-Ericsson has been delayed in releasing their push email phones if I&#8217;m not mistaken and it would seem that the phone companies would want to offer phones that can attack the Blackberry market slice.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
