<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MetroFi Teams With AT&amp;T for Muni WiFi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/metrofi-teams-with-att-for-muni-wifi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/metrofi-teams-with-att-for-muni-wifi/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:29:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marty Hahnfeld</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/metrofi-teams-with-att-for-muni-wifi/#comment-58108</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty Hahnfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/metrofi-teams-with-att-for-muni-wifi/#comment-58108</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Some bias here as MetroFi is a customer of mine, however I need to take exception to the &quot;MetroFi has been viewed as a laggard in the space&quot; comment&#8230; um, By whom exactly? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s see&#8230; they have basically pioneered the Ad-supported Free service tier model in the MuniFi space (yes, I know Google probably started it with their original SF chatter, but MetroFi put it in play before anybody else).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They have arguably the largest operating WiFi mesh network in existance -- located in the valley, the only comparable in size is Tempe which is a disaster by comparison and MobilePro is running away from their awards.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They service 10&#039;s of thousands of users on the network successfully and with a good (and getting better) user experience.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They have been winning most competitive situations they enter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They have attracted Tier-1 venture capital money, while no other pure-play in the game has either had to or been successful at it. (ie - there is confidence in their ability to turn a profit and succeed).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They have now attracted and partnered with the largest communications provider in the land.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yup&#8230; sounds really &quot;laggard-like&quot; to me&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some bias here as MetroFi is a customer of mine, however I need to take exception to the &#8220;MetroFi has been viewed as a laggard in the space&#8221; comment&#8230; um, By whom exactly? </p>

<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230; they have basically pioneered the Ad-supported Free service tier model in the MuniFi space (yes, I know Google probably started it with their original SF chatter, but MetroFi put it in play before anybody else).</p>

<p>They have arguably the largest operating WiFi mesh network in existance &#8212; located in the valley, the only comparable in size is Tempe which is a disaster by comparison and MobilePro is running away from their awards.</p>

<p>They service 10&#8217;s of thousands of users on the network successfully and with a good (and getting better) user experience.</p>

<p>They have been winning most competitive situations they enter.</p>

<p>They have attracted Tier-1 venture capital money, while no other pure-play in the game has either had to or been successful at it. (ie &#8211; there is confidence in their ability to turn a profit and succeed).</p>

<p>They have now attracted and partnered with the largest communications provider in the land.</p>

<p>Yup&#8230; sounds really &#8220;laggard-like&#8221; to me&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Stevens</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/metrofi-teams-with-att-for-muni-wifi/#comment-58106</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 15:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/metrofi-teams-with-att-for-muni-wifi/#comment-58106</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I beg to differ. AT&amp;T has a long history of partnering with &quot;new comers&quot; in new areas they consider a threat to their core business, only to &quot;squeeze them&quot; out of existence at later date. Who can forget AtHome?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I beg to differ. AT&amp;T has a long history of partnering with &#8220;new comers&#8221; in new areas they consider a threat to their core business, only to &#8220;squeeze them&#8221; out of existence at later date. Who can forget AtHome?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/metrofi-teams-with-att-for-muni-wifi/#comment-58100</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/metrofi-teams-with-att-for-muni-wifi/#comment-58100</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why does this put a crimp in Earthlink&#039;s plans? I would say it instead validates them. Competition is a pretty good indicator of potential for profit. Anyway, it&#039;s not like any single company was going to run every single municipal wireless network that got built in the entire country. Well, at least not without many rounds of M&amp;A activity.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does this put a crimp in Earthlink&#8217;s plans? I would say it instead validates them. Competition is a pretty good indicator of potential for profit. Anyway, it&#8217;s not like any single company was going to run every single municipal wireless network that got built in the entire country. Well, at least not without many rounds of M&amp;A activity.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akbar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/metrofi-teams-with-att-for-muni-wifi/#comment-58104</link>
		<dc:creator>akbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/metrofi-teams-with-att-for-muni-wifi/#comment-58104</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like its time for the rebel forces to start searching for r2 units and get to work on figuring out how to take down the deathstar.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is telling that this is announced only a few days after MetroFi got the greenlight for the city planners of Portland to do up that city with spectrum squashing wifi.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Everyone with exisiting wifi networks in Portland must be woindering if they should rename the city to Alderan.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CmdAkbar (retired)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like its time for the rebel forces to start searching for r2 units and get to work on figuring out how to take down the deathstar.</p>

<p>It is telling that this is announced only a few days after MetroFi got the greenlight for the city planners of Portland to do up that city with spectrum squashing wifi.</p>

<p>Everyone with exisiting wifi networks in Portland must be woindering if they should rename the city to Alderan.</p>

<p>CmdAkbar (retired)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/metrofi-teams-with-att-for-muni-wifi/#comment-58102</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/metrofi-teams-with-att-for-muni-wifi/#comment-58102</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;wait&#8230; AT&amp;T, aka the deathstar, has partnered to build a municipal wifi network??&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;i thought all AT&amp;T knew how to do was beg the government for permission to eliminate competition.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait&#8230; AT&amp;T, aka the deathstar, has partnered to build a municipal wifi network??</p>

<p>i thought all AT&amp;T knew how to do was beg the government for permission to eliminate competition.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KING TROLL</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/20/metrofi-teams-with-att-for-muni-wifi/#comment-58098</link>
		<dc:creator>KING TROLL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/20/metrofi-teams-with-att-for-muni-wifi/#comment-58098</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey bro, I really like your articles in business 2.0. I just found your blog and will be adding it to my daily reading list.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll be clicking on a few ads per day to , toshow my support!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey bro, I really like your articles in business 2.0. I just found your blog and will be adding it to my daily reading list.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ll be clicking on a few ads per day to , toshow my support!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
