<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NSF Backs Open Source Wireless Mesh Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Roest</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-927214</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Roest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-927214</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sascha,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Have you made progress since this thread started? I was reading elsewhere about an open hardware movement, with one project being design of an open source router by a peer-to-peer network led by a group in Germany, about a year ago. Now there is the router in the OLPC XO, which is all open source. This needs to be available to build primary communication networks in the developing world, to drive distribution of knowledge of sustainability, and support economic activity at the grass roots. Ideally, the Intel bridge router will also be available for long links (to 60 km or miles) between concentrations of rural people and villages. The structural system for the towers was invented in the 1960s -- it is the Captive Column, U.S. Patent 3,501,880, , and you can make towers out of bamboo and silk or wire or vines if you have to -- or kevlar and carbon, or fiberglass and balsa wood (like the tractor test beam in the website photo). It&#039;s all in the intelligent use of geometry.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is a nascent movement to create a new curriculum for the XO and any other computer that can run Sugar; I&#039;m helping get it started.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do you have any interest in this, and / or any thoughts of guidance?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mark&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sascha,</p>

<p>Have you made progress since this thread started? I was reading elsewhere about an open hardware movement, with one project being design of an open source router by a peer-to-peer network led by a group in Germany, about a year ago. Now there is the router in the OLPC XO, which is all open source. This needs to be available to build primary communication networks in the developing world, to drive distribution of knowledge of sustainability, and support economic activity at the grass roots. Ideally, the Intel bridge router will also be available for long links (to 60 km or miles) between concentrations of rural people and villages. The structural system for the towers was invented in the 1960s &#8212; it is the Captive Column, U.S. Patent 3,501,880, , and you can make towers out of bamboo and silk or wire or vines if you have to &#8212; or kevlar and carbon, or fiberglass and balsa wood (like the tractor test beam in the website photo). It&#8217;s all in the intelligent use of geometry.</p>

<p>There is a nascent movement to create a new curriculum for the XO and any other computer that can run Sugar; I&#8217;m helping get it started.</p>

<p>Do you have any interest in this, and / or any thoughts of guidance?</p>

<p>Regards,</p>

<p>Mark</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karib Corner-Blog Reports &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NSF Backs Open Source Wireless Mesh Project</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-324736</link>
		<dc:creator>Karib Corner-Blog Reports &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NSF Backs Open Source Wireless Mesh Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 18:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-324736</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] at work trying to make wireless networking free. And they just got some funds to help their cause.  read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story   Filed under: Tech  [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at work trying to make wireless networking free. And they just got some funds to help their cause.  read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story   Filed under: Tech  [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ole Tange</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-57883</link>
		<dc:creator>Ole Tange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-57883</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if the mesh network will be dynamic enough for mobile phones to take part of it. It could be installed on the Open Source iPhone: Neo1973 running OpenMoko: http://www.linuxtogo.org/gowiki/OpenMoko/iPhone&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the mesh network will be dynamic enough for mobile phones to take part of it. It could be installed on the Open Source iPhone: Neo1973 running OpenMoko: <a href="http://www.linuxtogo.org/gowiki/OpenMoko/iPhone" rel="nofollow">http://www.linuxtogo.org/gowiki/OpenMoko/iPhone</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sascha Meinrath</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-57881</link>
		<dc:creator>Sascha Meinrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-57881</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Scott -- you&#039;ve hit the nail on the head.  One of the differentiators between CUWiN and other mesh wireless technologies is that we&#039;re developing a true ad-hoc peer-to-peer mesh.  So if it&#039;s just you and a dozen friends on a desert island, if you&#039;re using CUWiN, you can set up an island-wide LAN and directly connect to one-another.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And if you have a community-wide LAN, then yes, if the traffic is local, there&#039;s no need to use Internet connectivity at all.  One of the &quot;killer apps&quot; for this is, of course, VoIP -- basically, if everyone is covered by the community LAN, then there&#039;s no need to pay for local phone service at all, and the calls would be routed directly to each local participant, so no need to utilize that external bandwidth at all.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Jesse lays out the next logical step -- tying together these community LANs to form a national infrastructure.  Sound far-fetched?  I&#039;ve been working with several groups to do exactly this -- we&#039;re hoping to go public with the effort within the next few months, so stay tuned.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott &#8212; you&#8217;ve hit the nail on the head.  One of the differentiators between CUWiN and other mesh wireless technologies is that we&#8217;re developing a true ad-hoc peer-to-peer mesh.  So if it&#8217;s just you and a dozen friends on a desert island, if you&#8217;re using CUWiN, you can set up an island-wide LAN and directly connect to one-another.  </p>

<p>And if you have a community-wide LAN, then yes, if the traffic is local, there&#8217;s no need to use Internet connectivity at all.  One of the &#8220;killer apps&#8221; for this is, of course, VoIP &#8212; basically, if everyone is covered by the community LAN, then there&#8217;s no need to pay for local phone service at all, and the calls would be routed directly to each local participant, so no need to utilize that external bandwidth at all.</p>

<p>Jesse lays out the next logical step &#8212; tying together these community LANs to form a national infrastructure.  Sound far-fetched?  I&#8217;ve been working with several groups to do exactly this &#8212; we&#8217;re hoping to go public with the effort within the next few months, so stay tuned.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-57880</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-57880</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Scott, if we all set up routers that could talk to each other we would have recreated the Internet -- because that is what the Internet is. The question is, who provides the connections to cover the long stretchs of unpopulated area that are way beyond the range of unlicensed wireless? For example, how does Las Vegas talk to Los Angeles? Right now, the only way to do so is to ride on a privately owned network that will charge you for the privilege. If there was a publically funded longhaul backbone to tie into (something like the public road system), your idea would be a go. Still if you live in a big enough city, you might be able to create your own local network using the WiFi routers that you don&#039;t care if you can talk to the rest of the world . . .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, if we all set up routers that could talk to each other we would have recreated the Internet &#8212; because that is what the Internet is. The question is, who provides the connections to cover the long stretchs of unpopulated area that are way beyond the range of unlicensed wireless? For example, how does Las Vegas talk to Los Angeles? Right now, the only way to do so is to ride on a privately owned network that will charge you for the privilege. If there was a publically funded longhaul backbone to tie into (something like the public road system), your idea would be a go. Still if you live in a big enough city, you might be able to create your own local network using the WiFi routers that you don&#8217;t care if you can talk to the rest of the world . . .</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott AZ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-57878</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott AZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 05:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-57878</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If we all set up wireless routers that could talk to one another could we get a faster network without having to go to the web.  I might be way off but when I transfer one file from one computer to another on my network it is much faster than when I download the same size file over the net.  Could some one tell me how off I am or if I may be on to something.  Thanks for reading and replying&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we all set up wireless routers that could talk to one another could we get a faster network without having to go to the web.  I might be way off but when I transfer one file from one computer to another on my network it is much faster than when I download the same size file over the net.  Could some one tell me how off I am or if I may be on to something.  Thanks for reading and replying</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Felter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-57876</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Felter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-57876</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is not the only project of its kind; MIT Roofnet has been making good progress for a few years now (probably funded by NSF IRIS).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not the only project of its kind; MIT Roofnet has been making good progress for a few years now (probably funded by NSF IRIS).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Convergence.In</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-57874</link>
		<dc:creator>Convergence.In</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/open-source-wireless-mesh/#comment-57874</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So will Fonero Network, the largest wi-fi community in the world go open source as well ? Their are currently 70,222 Foneros.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So will Fonero Network, the largest wi-fi community in the world go open source as well ? Their are currently 70,222 Foneros.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
