<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jobster Raises $18 million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/jobster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/jobster/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NowHiring.com.au Blog &#187; The sound of gurgling grows louder at Jobster?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/jobster/#comment-606377</link>
		<dc:creator>NowHiring.com.au Blog &#187; The sound of gurgling grows louder at Jobster?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/jobster/#comment-606377</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] application pricing (PPA). They appear to be failing despite the fact that they have had massive financial backing, great technology, extensive marketing and a solid audience. There are plenty of lessons to be [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] application pricing (PPA). They appear to be failing despite the fact that they have had massive financial backing, great technology, extensive marketing and a solid audience. There are plenty of lessons to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niche jobs - Crunchboard at After The Dot Net</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/jobster/#comment-57808</link>
		<dc:creator>Niche jobs - Crunchboard at After The Dot Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 00:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/jobster/#comment-57808</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] attention. From vertical search plays such as Indeed, to new players such as TheLadders, and Jobsters are trying to address some of the inefficiencies of the current online job [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] attention. From vertical search plays such as Indeed, to new players such as TheLadders, and Jobsters are trying to address some of the inefficiencies of the current online job [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason B.</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/jobster/#comment-57807</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/jobster/#comment-57807</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Michael you have an interesting assessment, however, it's just that - an assessment.  Our hire rates are well over 20% with the system, with a ROI through the ceiling, not the floor.  With that, their pricing is competitive.  It's like any other investment or choice a HR or Recruiting Leader makes.  It does not surprising me that people point their finger at Jobster - it's one tool for crying out loud.  You won't get hires through the system if you just sit by the phone.  Jobster is considered leading edge by individuals that get the game of recruiting, and is one organization you can call a partner and not a vendor.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael you have an interesting assessment, however, it&#8217;s just that - an assessment.  Our hire rates are well over 20% with the system, with a ROI through the ceiling, not the floor.  With that, their pricing is competitive.  It&#8217;s like any other investment or choice a HR or Recruiting Leader makes.  It does not surprising me that people point their finger at Jobster - it&#8217;s one tool for crying out loud.  You won&#8217;t get hires through the system if you just sit by the phone.  Jobster is considered leading edge by individuals that get the game of recruiting, and is one organization you can call a partner and not a vendor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason goldberg</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/jobster/#comment-57805</link>
		<dc:creator>jason goldberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/jobster/#comment-57805</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;rather than engage the anonymous poster, i'll just note that we are cranking on renewals and have dozens of customer case studies.  check out my blog to learn more www.jobster.blogs.com or visit our corp website at www.jobster.com/corp&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rather than engage the anonymous poster, i&#8217;ll just note that we are cranking on renewals and have dozens of customer case studies.  check out my blog to learn more  (<a href="http://www.jobster.blogs.com" rel="nofollow">link</a>)  or visit our corp website at  (<a href="http://www.jobster.com/corp" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeInAZ</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/jobster/#comment-57804</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeInAZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/jobster/#comment-57804</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why would you take/borrow money you don't need?  Doesn't that dilute your ownership and control?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's like a home equity loan&#8230;haha&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you take/borrow money you don&#8217;t need?  Doesn&#8217;t that dilute your ownership and control?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like a home equity loan&#8230;haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/jobster/#comment-57803</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/jobster/#comment-57803</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I know of this company too well. The investment is troubling. Customer hire rates are below 20 percent through the system and for many customers success rates are lower, putting ROI through the floor. They have lost traction and credibility with many recruiters and those headhunters are the ambassadors of their solution to the HR executives who spend the average of 4-6K per month. Also as a testament to their fledgling success (not growth but success specific to actual hiring numbers) they rolled out a Monster style pricing scheme many months ago in trial form to hundreds of recruiters the majority of whom balked at it. This is 48 million dollars wasted on a potential sale of between 5-10 million 3 years from now for assets and customers. Sorry. Do something else with those funds please. Even their largest flagship original customer (shall remain nameless) has complained of hiring rates to the effect of "4 hires over 8 months from roughly 80 postings in the system" and that really hurts when it comes to renewals.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know of this company too well. The investment is troubling. Customer hire rates are below 20 percent through the system and for many customers success rates are lower, putting ROI through the floor. They have lost traction and credibility with many recruiters and those headhunters are the ambassadors of their solution to the HR executives who spend the average of 4-6K per month. Also as a testament to their fledgling success (not growth but success specific to actual hiring numbers) they rolled out a Monster style pricing scheme many months ago in trial form to hundreds of recruiters the majority of whom balked at it. This is 48 million dollars wasted on a potential sale of between 5-10 million 3 years from now for assets and customers. Sorry. Do something else with those funds please. Even their largest flagship original customer (shall remain nameless) has complained of hiring rates to the effect of &#8220;4 hires over 8 months from roughly 80 postings in the system&#8221; and that really hurts when it comes to renewals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Buckbee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/19/jobster/#comment-57802</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Buckbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/19/jobster/#comment-57802</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting, I'd heard similar things from both Jason Calcanais (for WebLogs Inc) and from PUD (for Adbrite) that they had taken money and just kept it in the bank in case something happened.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I&#8217;d heard similar things from both Jason Calcanais (for WebLogs Inc) and from PUD (for Adbrite) that they had taken money and just kept it in the bank in case something happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
