Comments on: Current Co. Eyes Wireless Spectrum http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/ Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:35:15 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Randy Liar http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-940841 Randy Liar Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:54:00 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-940841 <p>Billy sucks and soe does giOM</p> Billy sucks and soe does giOM

]]> By: Kevin Martin http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-57626 Kevin Martin Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:24:09 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-57626 <p>Bill Berkman is one of the smartest guys around and does a great job of building a business. Om - Hat's off to you on this post. This was news to me and I follow the FCC closely. Many people (particularly on the West coast) may not know Bill who is in New York - so I will link a bio. </p> <p>http://www.iac.com/index/management/board<em>of</em>directors/bio<em>bod</em>wberkman.htmHats off to this post OM excellent reporting.</p> <p>Given that Current is building a network, Bill's board seat on Interactive Corp and the investment by Google does anyone have any thoughts about Current's positions on Network Neutrality?!?</p> Bill Berkman is one of the smartest guys around and does a great job of building a business. Om – Hat’s off to you on this post. This was news to me and I follow the FCC closely. Many people (particularly on the West coast) may not know Bill who is in New York – so I will link a bio.

http://www.iac.com/index/management/boardofdirectors/biobodwberkman.htmHats off to this post OM excellent reporting.

Given that Current is building a network, Bill’s board seat on Interactive Corp and the investment by Google does anyone have any thoughts about Current’s positions on Network Neutrality?!?

]]> By: Charlie Sierra http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-57625 Charlie Sierra Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:23:58 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-57625 <p>Wireless auctions are not in the public's interest. </p> <p>The only party that really benefits is Wall Street.</p> Wireless auctions are not in the public’s interest.

The only party that really benefits is Wall Street.

]]> By: rick http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-57623 rick Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:03:06 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-57623 <p>Good dig. Was wondering how Google would indirectly get some spectrum rights.</p> Good dig. Was wondering how Google would indirectly get some spectrum rights.

]]>