<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Current Co. Eyes Wireless Spectrum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Martin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-57626</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-57626</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bill Berkman is one of the smartest guys around and does a great job of building a business. Om - Hat's off to you on this post.  This was news to me and I follow the FCC closely. Many people (particularly on the West coast) may not know Bill who is in New York - so I will link a bio.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.iac.com/index/management/board&lt;em&gt;of&lt;/em&gt;directors/bio&lt;em&gt;bod&lt;/em&gt;wberkman.htmHats off to this post OM excellent reporting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Given that Current is building a network, Bill's board seat on Interactive Corp and the investment by Google does anyone have any thoughts about Current's positions on Network Neutrality?!?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Berkman is one of the smartest guys around and does a great job of building a business. Om - Hat&#8217;s off to you on this post.  This was news to me and I follow the FCC closely. Many people (particularly on the West coast) may not know Bill who is in New York - so I will link a bio.  </p>
<p> (<a href="http://www.iac.com/index/management/board" rel="nofollow">link</a>) <em>of</em>directors/bio<em>bod</em>wberkman.htmHats off to this post OM excellent reporting.</p>
<p>Given that Current is building a network, Bill&#8217;s board seat on Interactive Corp and the investment by Google does anyone have any thoughts about Current&#8217;s positions on Network Neutrality?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Sierra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-57625</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Sierra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-57625</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wireless auctions are not in the public's interest. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The only party that really benefits is Wall Street.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wireless auctions are not in the public&#8217;s interest. </p>
<p>The only party that really benefits is Wall Street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-57623</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-57623</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good dig.  Was wondering how Google would indirectly get some spectrum rights.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good dig.  Was wondering how Google would indirectly get some spectrum rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
