Comments on: Current Co. Eyes Wireless Spectrum http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/ Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Randy Liar http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-120443 Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:54:00 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-120443 Billy sucks and soe does giOM

]]> By: Kevin Martin http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-120442 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:24:09 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-120442 Bill Berkman is one of the smartest guys around and does a great job of building a business. Om – Hat’s off to you on this post. This was news to me and I follow the FCC closely. Many people (particularly on the West coast) may not know Bill who is in New York – so I will link a bio.

http://www.iac.com/index/management/boardofdirectors/biobodwberkman.htmHats off to this post OM excellent reporting.

Given that Current is building a network, Bill’s board seat on Interactive Corp and the investment by Google does anyone have any thoughts about Current’s positions on Network Neutrality?!?

]]> By: Charlie Sierra http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-120441 Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:23:58 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-120441 Wireless auctions are not in the public’s interest.

The only party that really benefits is Wall Street.

]]> By: rick http://gigaom.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-120440 Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:03:06 +0000 http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/18/current/#comment-120440 Good dig. Was wondering how Google would indirectly get some spectrum rights.

]]>