<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Argo &amp; Microsoft’s Portable Dreams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/07/16/argo-microsoft%e2%80%99s-portable-dreams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/16/argo-microsoft%e2%80%99s-portable-dreams/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:29:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zune</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/16/argo-microsoft%e2%80%99s-portable-dreams/#comment-57418</link>
		<dc:creator>zune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/16/argo-microsoft%e2%80%99s-portable-dreams/#comment-57418</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The xbox has lost billions but all new business are expected to loose money the first 3 years.  Look at the long run, they can now work in the console market for the next 50 years.  Same goes for zune.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The xbox has lost billions but all new business are expected to loose money the first 3 years.  Look at the long run, they can now work in the console market for the next 50 years.  Same goes for zune.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tf</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/16/argo-microsoft%e2%80%99s-portable-dreams/#comment-57416</link>
		<dc:creator>tf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/16/argo-microsoft%e2%80%99s-portable-dreams/#comment-57416</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Seems relying on the XBox model is exactly why Microsoft may be done in the future: is it really wise to have another billion dollar or multibillion dollar unit that loses money?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, the 360 and Live are good products, but they both lose money, and despite your concerns about Sony&#039;s next generation, the PS2 outsells the XBox! Repeat: outsells. I would wager that when the PS3 does come, the combined %s of PSOne (they still sell well), PS2, and PS3 will make Microsoft&#039;s 4 billion dollar experiment to get to 18% of the market look silly and hugely costly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As you point out, this is the beachhead for MS even if Windows and Office remain the only sources of profit. So why would it be a good thing to engage another loss leader that concedes none of the 5 different media strategies they&#039;ve had over the last 5 years made any sense while at the same time raising competition and antitrust concerns by once again going to a vertical, tied solution after promising an open platform for their partners?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems relying on the XBox model is exactly why Microsoft may be done in the future: is it really wise to have another billion dollar or multibillion dollar unit that loses money?</p>

<p>Yes, the 360 and Live are good products, but they both lose money, and despite your concerns about Sony&#8217;s next generation, the PS2 outsells the XBox! Repeat: outsells. I would wager that when the PS3 does come, the combined %s of PSOne (they still sell well), PS2, and PS3 will make Microsoft&#8217;s 4 billion dollar experiment to get to 18% of the market look silly and hugely costly.</p>

<p>As you point out, this is the beachhead for MS even if Windows and Office remain the only sources of profit. So why would it be a good thing to engage another loss leader that concedes none of the 5 different media strategies they&#8217;ve had over the last 5 years made any sense while at the same time raising competition and antitrust concerns by once again going to a vertical, tied solution after promising an open platform for their partners?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heppy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/16/argo-microsoft%e2%80%99s-portable-dreams/#comment-57413</link>
		<dc:creator>Heppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 05:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/16/argo-microsoft%e2%80%99s-portable-dreams/#comment-57413</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The first reaction was to think that the key to winning against the iPod was to have an open, drm-free platform for music.  But now I don&#039;t think this is true&#8230;obviously openess does not matter in this market&#8230;ease of use is king.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt; As a matter of fact, the key to winning against the iPod is to have a platform where consumers can connect to each other and to musicians through the medium of music.  iTunes is still very much a connection between the consumer and the firm (Apple in this case).  Connect consumers together and you will have a movement.
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first reaction was to think that the key to winning against the iPod was to have an open, drm-free platform for music.  But now I don&#8217;t think this is true&#8230;obviously openess does not matter in this market&#8230;ease of use is king.</p>

<pre><code> As a matter of fact, the key to winning against the iPod is to have a platform where consumers can connect to each other and to musicians through the medium of music.  iTunes is still very much a connection between the consumer and the firm (Apple in this case).  Connect consumers together and you will have a movement.
</code></pre>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
