<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Frucall Could Save You Pennies (Or $$$s)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/07/10/frucall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/10/frucall/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/10/frucall/#comment-56657</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 01:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/10/frucall/#comment-56657</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Barcodes are a pain in the ass to type. As Alan mentions, they are also hard to properly photograph (even with a dedicated camera, let alone a phone). The answer is better software at the server end. Computing power coupled with fuzzy logic could go a long way.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barcodes are a pain in the ass to type. As Alan mentions, they are also hard to properly photograph (even with a dedicated camera, let alone a phone). The answer is better software at the server end. Computing power coupled with fuzzy logic could go a long way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan A. Reiter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/10/frucall/#comment-56631</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan A. Reiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/10/frucall/#comment-56631</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The cellular operators have been pondering wireless e-commerce for years and there has been relatively little activity&#8230;until recently.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The operators have been terrified of irritating their subscribers through any sort of advertising and have not been able to come up with innovative wireless e-commerce products.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Commerce over wireless is primarily ringtones and wallpaper and, most recently, music downloads.  In the past year there has been an explosion of companies offering their solutions to wireless commerce and advertising.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A few barcode companies, such as Scanbuy and NeoMedia, for example, have been aggressive in promoting barcodes for camera phones.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Taking a camera phone photo of a barcode -- and then receiving information about the product -- seems to make a lot of sense.  But camera phone photos usually do a terrible job of producing an image that can be readable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is changing, somewhat, as we're seeing one megapixel, two megapixel and, just recently, a three megapixel camera phone.  Alas, getting a good barcode image requires much more than a high number of pixels.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cellular operators have been pondering wireless e-commerce for years and there has been relatively little activity&#8230;until recently.</p>
<p>The operators have been terrified of irritating their subscribers through any sort of advertising and have not been able to come up with innovative wireless e-commerce products.</p>
<p>Commerce over wireless is primarily ringtones and wallpaper and, most recently, music downloads.  In the past year there has been an explosion of companies offering their solutions to wireless commerce and advertising.</p>
<p>A few barcode companies, such as Scanbuy and NeoMedia, for example, have been aggressive in promoting barcodes for camera phones.</p>
<p>Taking a camera phone photo of a barcode &#8212; and then receiving information about the product &#8212; seems to make a lot of sense.  But camera phone photos usually do a terrible job of producing an image that can be readable.</p>
<p>This is changing, somewhat, as we&#8217;re seeing one megapixel, two megapixel and, just recently, a three megapixel camera phone.  Alas, getting a good barcode image requires much more than a high number of pixels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Weber</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/10/frucall/#comment-56628</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/10/frucall/#comment-56628</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Based on who the data is being provided by, it looks like they are getting a percentage of what Yahoo charges the merchant for the sale, the standard affiliate rate that Amazon pays, and percentage of what Streetprices.com charges merchants to be in their network.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on who the data is being provided by, it looks like they are getting a percentage of what Yahoo charges the merchant for the sale, the standard affiliate rate that Amazon pays, and percentage of what Streetprices.com charges merchants to be in their network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aidan Henry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/10/frucall/#comment-56625</link>
		<dc:creator>Aidan Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 23:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/10/frucall/#comment-56625</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Any indication as to the longer term revenue model? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It looks like advertising, pay-per-use, or a periodic fee could be explored?&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any indication as to the longer term revenue model? </p>
<p>It looks like advertising, pay-per-use, or a periodic fee could be explored?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
