<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech IPOs Are NoGo&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/07/06/tech-ipo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/06/tech-ipo/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:25:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tech Beat</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/06/tech-ipo/#comment-56196</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Beat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 05:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/06/tech-ipo/#comment-56196</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Are Tech IPOs on the Upswing?&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sure looks like it from Paul Kedrosky&#039;s analysis: But given that some high-profile companies such as Clearwire didn&#039;t go out, it still might be a little early to tell how sustainable the resurgence is&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Are Tech IPOs on the Upswing?&#8230;</strong></p>

<p>Sure looks like it from Paul Kedrosky&#8217;s analysis: But given that some high-profile companies such as Clearwire didn&#8217;t go out, it still might be a little early to tell how sustainable the resurgence is&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/06/tech-ipo/#comment-56189</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 21:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/06/tech-ipo/#comment-56189</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think in the case of Clearwire, cause and effect are being reversed. They didn&#039;t stop the IPO because it was too risky, they stopped it because they got a better offer from a private investor -- Intel.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in the case of Clearwire, cause and effect are being reversed. They didn&#8217;t stop the IPO because it was too risky, they stopped it because they got a better offer from a private investor &#8212; Intel.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aswath</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/06/tech-ipo/#comment-56184</link>
		<dc:creator>Aswath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 00:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/06/tech-ipo/#comment-56184</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Acme Packet&#039;s prospect is all the more interesting to watch, in light of Netrake&#039;s exit and Newport&#039;s recent performance.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acme Packet&#8217;s prospect is all the more interesting to watch, in light of Netrake&#8217;s exit and Newport&#8217;s recent performance.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
