<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s A WiBro World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/07/03/its-a-wibro-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/03/its-a-wibro-world/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:37:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Convergence.In</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/03/its-a-wibro-world/#comment-119700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Convergence.In]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 04:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/03/its-a-wibro-world/#comment-119700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;So we will pretty soon have VoIP/SIP Mobile phone :)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we will pretty soon have VoIP/SIP Mobile phone :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Yonts</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/03/its-a-wibro-world/#comment-119699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Yonts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 02:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/03/its-a-wibro-world/#comment-119699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Samsung&#039;s global Wibro expedition will certainly pay off in terms of wireless broadband equipment know-how. However, I think they will be more standards agnostic than public statements would suggest. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This would repeat a pattern that we&#039;ve been seeing with DMB, the Korean mobile TV standard. Likely because of govt pressure, Samsung initially appeared to be backing the DMB standard exclusively. It has since become clear that the company is positioning itself to be a mobile TV leader in every flavour - DMB, DVB-H, FLO.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With its Wibro projects, Samsung seems to be securing a spot on the wireless broadband leaders&#039; board, although not necessarily with Wibro. Keep in mind that Wibro will not be compatible with &#039;mobile wimax&#039; certified products when they come out (optimistically 4Q06 - probably 1h07), even though Wibro complies with 802.16-2005. In effect, it is just as proprietary as the &#039;pre-mobile wimax&#039; projects, like the one Motorola is working on in Pakistan. (For an explanation of why they won&#039;t be compatible, check Nortel&#039;s site.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regardless, Sammie wins out in 2 big ways with its early Wibro efforts. First, the company gets a nice headstart manufacturing and deploying wireless broadband equipment in quantity. Second, the more succesful Wibro deployments it has, the more leverage Samsung will have to get its patents into the final &#039;mobile wimax&#039; certified specs. Of course, that assumes that Intel, Moto, etc will consider the good of the cause ahead of their own patents.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung&#8217;s global Wibro expedition will certainly pay off in terms of wireless broadband equipment know-how. However, I think they will be more standards agnostic than public statements would suggest. </p>
<p>This would repeat a pattern that we&#8217;ve been seeing with DMB, the Korean mobile TV standard. Likely because of govt pressure, Samsung initially appeared to be backing the DMB standard exclusively. It has since become clear that the company is positioning itself to be a mobile TV leader in every flavour &#8211; DMB, DVB-H, FLO.</p>
<p>With its Wibro projects, Samsung seems to be securing a spot on the wireless broadband leaders&#8217; board, although not necessarily with Wibro. Keep in mind that Wibro will not be compatible with &#8216;mobile wimax&#8217; certified products when they come out (optimistically 4Q06 &#8211; probably 1h07), even though Wibro complies with 802.16-2005. In effect, it is just as proprietary as the &#8216;pre-mobile wimax&#8217; projects, like the one Motorola is working on in Pakistan. (For an explanation of why they won&#8217;t be compatible, check Nortel&#8217;s site.)</p>
<p>Regardless, Sammie wins out in 2 big ways with its early Wibro efforts. First, the company gets a nice headstart manufacturing and deploying wireless broadband equipment in quantity. Second, the more succesful Wibro deployments it has, the more leverage Samsung will have to get its patents into the final &#8216;mobile wimax&#8217; certified specs. Of course, that assumes that Intel, Moto, etc will consider the good of the cause ahead of their own patents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oren Michels</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/07/03/its-a-wibro-world/#comment-119698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oren Michels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/07/03/its-a-wibro-world/#comment-119698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Welcome to GigaOm, Katie!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://oren.blogs.com/praxis/2006/07/congrats&lt;em&gt;to&lt;/em&gt;om_.html&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to GigaOm, Katie!</p>
<p><a href="http://oren.blogs.com/praxis/2006/07/congrats" rel="nofollow">http://oren.blogs.com/praxis/2006/07/congrats</a><em>to</em>om_.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
