<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google and MySpace: Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:56:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Goog&#8217;s YouTube Effort Informed by MySpace Pass? &#171; Screenwerk</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-979985</link>
		<dc:creator>Goog&#8217;s YouTube Effort Informed by MySpace Pass? &#171; Screenwerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-979985</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] YouTube Effort Informed by MySpace&#160;Pass? By Greg Sterling  Rupert Murdoch famously claimed that Google could have purchased MySpace for half of the $580 million he paid for it but the search [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YouTube Effort Informed by MySpace&nbsp;Pass? By Greg Sterling  Rupert Murdoch famously claimed that Google could have purchased MySpace for half of the $580 million he paid for it but the search [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Power of community &#171; talk-share-learn</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-902281</link>
		<dc:creator>Power of community &#171; talk-share-learn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-902281</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Rupert Murdoch famously claimed that Google could have purchased MySpace for half of the $580 million he paid for it but the search [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rupert Murdoch famously claimed that Google could have purchased MySpace for half of the $580 million he paid for it but the search [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Google Acquire Facebook? &#187; Publishing 2.0</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-320746</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Google Acquire Facebook? &#187; Publishing 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 21:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-320746</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] year ago, I had written that Google woulda, coulda, shoulda bought MySpace when it had the chance. How interesting a twist of fate if Google ends up buying Facebook instead, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year ago, I had written that Google woulda, coulda, shoulda bought MySpace when it had the chance. How interesting a twist of fate if Google ends up buying Facebook instead, [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iva</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55665</link>
		<dc:creator>iva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 23:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55665</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;not at all a blunder, myspace doesn&#039;t make much money, plus it can easily be copied. blogger is similar anyway...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not at all a blunder, myspace doesn&#8217;t make much money, plus it can easily be copied. blogger is similar anyway&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SonnyMotives &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google mua DoubleClick: 3.1 tỉ USD</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55648</link>
		<dc:creator>SonnyMotives &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google mua DoubleClick: 3.1 tỉ USD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 03:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55648</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] không nhận ra sức tăng trưởng &#8220;khủng khiếp&#8221; của mạng xã hội này, bỏ qua cơ hội mua MySpace với giá khoảng 290 triệu USD, để rồi phải mua quyền được quảng cáo trên [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] không nhận ra sức tăng trưởng &#8220;khủng khiếp&#8221; của mạng xã hội này, bỏ qua cơ hội mua MySpace với giá khoảng 290 triệu USD, để rồi phải mua quyền được quảng cáo trên [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55645</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 04:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55645</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think google should just develop thier own site called googlespace.  Myspace is too slow.  They need a company like google to run them.  Im sure its only a matter of time before google goes and makes thier own that overpowers myspace&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think google should just develop thier own site called googlespace.  Myspace is too slow.  They need a company like google to run them.  Im sure its only a matter of time before google goes and makes thier own that overpowers myspace&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thumbgen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55643</link>
		<dc:creator>Thumbgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 06:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55643</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What is interesting is how the deal between google and myspace gives us an insight into what we can expect on the mobile side &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.thumbgen.com/2006/08/07/myspace-and-google-deal-how-does-it-applies-to-mobile/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is interesting is how the deal between google and myspace gives us an insight into what we can expect on the mobile side </p>

<p><a href="http://www.thumbgen.com/2006/08/07/myspace-and-google-deal-how-does-it-applies-to-mobile/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thumbgen.com/2006/08/07/myspace-and-google-deal-how-does-it-applies-to-mobile/</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55640</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 05:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55640</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Myspace will fade away, yes, that is a given.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I predict that the new users will abandon it quite soon actually, because it has lost it&#039;s appeal as the millions have clouded the site with the pictures of thirteen year olds smoking blunts, the endless stupid surveys, the rediculous bulletins.  The reason that it has lasted this long, and the reason the people that have had it for a few years stick with it throughout all of its problems is that it is a way to communicate that is MUCH easier than email, and less one-on-one than the telephone and instant messenger.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It isn&#039;t just a site for people to take the classic &quot;myspace pic&quot; but for people to keep in touch with the people they already know on a day to day basis.  Comments offer a way to share messages.  Teens and preteens just do not like email.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So until a new site comes along that offers the ease of use that myspace has, it will stay relavant.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Was it a good idea for google to keep their hands off?  Of course.  Google is a bit too classy for fads such as this, no matter how relavant to the times.  And those stupid fourteen year old kids everyone talks about?  No way would they even think to type into the search box through myspace.  New tab, google.com.  Always. And with all the bad press that myspace has gotten because of adolescent stupidity, Google is wise not to have their name attatched to that.  Not every one knows what goes on behind the public eye with corporate deals, but Soccer Moms know the name Google, and soccer moms are afraid of myspace.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But it is an interesting comparison to MTV.  What has MTV with the best intentions become but a cesspool for Laguna Beach and Date My Mom.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Myspace will fade away, yes, that is a given.</p>

<p>I predict that the new users will abandon it quite soon actually, because it has lost it&#8217;s appeal as the millions have clouded the site with the pictures of thirteen year olds smoking blunts, the endless stupid surveys, the rediculous bulletins.  The reason that it has lasted this long, and the reason the people that have had it for a few years stick with it throughout all of its problems is that it is a way to communicate that is MUCH easier than email, and less one-on-one than the telephone and instant messenger.</p>

<p>It isn&#8217;t just a site for people to take the classic &#8220;myspace pic&#8221; but for people to keep in touch with the people they already know on a day to day basis.  Comments offer a way to share messages.  Teens and preteens just do not like email.  </p>

<p>So until a new site comes along that offers the ease of use that myspace has, it will stay relavant.</p>

<p>Was it a good idea for google to keep their hands off?  Of course.  Google is a bit too classy for fads such as this, no matter how relavant to the times.  And those stupid fourteen year old kids everyone talks about?  No way would they even think to type into the search box through myspace.  New tab, google.com.  Always. And with all the bad press that myspace has gotten because of adolescent stupidity, Google is wise not to have their name attatched to that.  Not every one knows what goes on behind the public eye with corporate deals, but Soccer Moms know the name Google, and soccer moms are afraid of myspace.</p>

<p>But it is an interesting comparison to MTV.  What has MTV with the best intentions become but a cesspool for Laguna Beach and Date My Mom.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shanks Pandiath</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55637</link>
		<dc:creator>Shanks Pandiath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55637</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article&#8230; and thanks for the info&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As you say, according to most management perspectives&#8230; it does seem, and in fact may be a strategic blunder..&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But for all big corporations, just like in politics, it is imperative to have a strong &quot;so-called opposition&quot; for their survival so as to retain their position..&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now, this is something most corporates or even politicians can afford, because if they slip.. they are history&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When you can pay someone to retain their current position, don&#039;t you think that this is a small investment..&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As they say, once you know your enemy, it is better to treat him as your friend&#8230;  [not that they are enemies, but in this case it is the competiiotion]&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well.. who knows&#8230; it is too big for us to comprehend !!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have clipped a piece of this article for my blog and back-linked you with a courtesy&#8230; [with your permission]&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article&#8230; and thanks for the info&#8230;</p>

<p>As you say, according to most management perspectives&#8230; it does seem, and in fact may be a strategic blunder..</p>

<p>But for all big corporations, just like in politics, it is imperative to have a strong &#8220;so-called opposition&#8221; for their survival so as to retain their position..</p>

<p>Now, this is something most corporates or even politicians can afford, because if they slip.. they are history</p>

<p>When you can pay someone to retain their current position, don&#8217;t you think that this is a small investment..</p>

<p>As they say, once you know your enemy, it is better to treat him as your friend&#8230;  [not that they are enemies, but in this case it is the competiiotion]</p>

<p>Well.. who knows&#8230; it is too big for us to comprehend !!</p>

<p>I have clipped a piece of this article for my blog and back-linked you with a courtesy&#8230; [with your permission]</p>

<p>Cheers</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55634</link>
		<dc:creator>Mil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55634</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t believe myspace is going anywhere anytime soon- Why? Because myspace is a place for Exhibitionism- People will do anything to be seen and given attention and Myspace is the accepted medium for such behavior. Would these people pose half naked for a passerby on the street? Probably not. But yet they post pictures of themselves doing just that and let complete strangers in on even the most minute detail of their lives.We live in a world where 99% of the public is retarded and a corporate world that NEEDS it to stay that way in order to keep making money. I&#039;m glad that Google has chosen to keep its reputation in good standing and I agree it was the best choice that in the long run would be more profitable as well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe myspace is going anywhere anytime soon- Why? Because myspace is a place for Exhibitionism- People will do anything to be seen and given attention and Myspace is the accepted medium for such behavior. Would these people pose half naked for a passerby on the street? Probably not. But yet they post pictures of themselves doing just that and let complete strangers in on even the most minute detail of their lives.We live in a world where 99% of the public is retarded and a corporate world that NEEDS it to stay that way in order to keep making money. I&#8217;m glad that Google has chosen to keep its reputation in good standing and I agree it was the best choice that in the long run would be more profitable as well.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me myself and i</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55632</link>
		<dc:creator>me myself and i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 21:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55632</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;myspace users want an environment to talk to friends and meet new people. we do not want it sucked up and turned into a profitable website&#8230; free sites are always ruined when people try to make a buck out of it&#8230; turn it into advertising and marketing crap&#8230; just give me the site as it was originally created&#8230; im glad google passed up on the deal. they were smart. no one goes on myspace to look at teh ads&#8230; how stupid&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>myspace users want an environment to talk to friends and meet new people. we do not want it sucked up and turned into a profitable website&#8230; free sites are always ruined when people try to make a buck out of it&#8230; turn it into advertising and marketing crap&#8230; just give me the site as it was originally created&#8230; im glad google passed up on the deal. they were smart. no one goes on myspace to look at teh ads&#8230; how stupid</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55630</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 10:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55630</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;also - google does not go around buying everyone&#039;s websites, no matter special the website thinks they are.  they know everyone will come running to google, saying please pay me.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also &#8211; google does not go around buying everyone&#8217;s websites, no matter special the website thinks they are.  they know everyone will come running to google, saying please pay me.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55628</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 10:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55628</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;email is for communicating online.  the rest of the internet is business related.  also - why should anyone link all their friends together.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>email is for communicating online.  the rest of the internet is business related.  also &#8211; why should anyone link all their friends together.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave mcclure</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55625</link>
		<dc:creator>dave mcclure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55625</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;can&#039;t believe how many people on this comment thread have their collective head up their arses.  MySpace was a F&#039;ING FANTASTIC deal for News/FIM.  Anyone who passed on that deal feels like an IDIOT right now, i guarantee you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;metrics don&#039;t lie.  MySpace isn&#039;t in the top 10 Internet properties for both visitors &amp; traffic for no reason.  if it&#039;s a fad, it&#039;s a pretty goddamn successful fad folks&#8230; and check out eBay for a portal with lots of unwashed masses with incredibly fanatic user base.  Facebook might be the only property with a more frequent user visit profile, but MySpace ain&#039;t too shabby either, and it&#039;s 10x as popular.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;doesn&#039;t matter how crappy the demographic is with those kind of numbers.  and if you think they won&#039;t figure out how to monetize it, you&#039;re completely misunderstanding the negotiating power behind these kind of numbers:
  http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2006/05/myspace&lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt;1&lt;em&gt;google&lt;/em&gt;traffic_so.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;MySpace is worth tons of money in the same way that AOL was worth enough money for Google to outbid Microsoft on the deal and throw down $5B (investment) on the spot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;get over yourselves on this one.  MySpace is not GeoCities or Tripod or Broadcast.com.  MySpace is a reality, and even if they jump the shark and growth starts falling off, it&#039;s STILL going to be worth a crapload and while there&#039;s some risk the audience shifts to other services, i seriously doubt that much traffic gets completely displaced over night -- at this point too many people have embedded their photos, comments, friends, personality, and other life essence for it to just go away.  it might still fade away, but in any case it&#039;s already been a GREAT deal for News that has put them on the playing field.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;all you armchair analysts need to get a clue.   betting on the future downfall of MySpace &amp; the lack of monetization as good reasons for Google passing on the deal strikes me as the Internet version of sour grapes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;dave mcclure
http://500hats.typepad.com&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can&#8217;t believe how many people on this comment thread have their collective head up their arses.  MySpace was a F&#8217;ING FANTASTIC deal for News/FIM.  Anyone who passed on that deal feels like an IDIOT right now, i guarantee you.</p>

<p>metrics don&#8217;t lie.  MySpace isn&#8217;t in the top 10 Internet properties for both visitors &amp; traffic for no reason.  if it&#8217;s a fad, it&#8217;s a pretty goddamn successful fad folks&#8230; and check out eBay for a portal with lots of unwashed masses with incredibly fanatic user base.  Facebook might be the only property with a more frequent user visit profile, but MySpace ain&#8217;t too shabby either, and it&#8217;s 10x as popular.</p>

<p>doesn&#8217;t matter how crappy the demographic is with those kind of numbers.  and if you think they won&#8217;t figure out how to monetize it, you&#8217;re completely misunderstanding the negotiating power behind these kind of numbers:
  <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2006/05/myspace" rel="nofollow">http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2006/05/myspace</a><em>is</em>1<em>google</em>traffic_so.html</p>

<p>MySpace is worth tons of money in the same way that AOL was worth enough money for Google to outbid Microsoft on the deal and throw down $5B (investment) on the spot.</p>

<p>get over yourselves on this one.  MySpace is not GeoCities or Tripod or Broadcast.com.  MySpace is a reality, and even if they jump the shark and growth starts falling off, it&#8217;s STILL going to be worth a crapload and while there&#8217;s some risk the audience shifts to other services, i seriously doubt that much traffic gets completely displaced over night &#8212; at this point too many people have embedded their photos, comments, friends, personality, and other life essence for it to just go away.  it might still fade away, but in any case it&#8217;s already been a GREAT deal for News that has put them on the playing field.</p>

<p>all you armchair analysts need to get a clue.   betting on the future downfall of MySpace &amp; the lack of monetization as good reasons for Google passing on the deal strikes me as the Internet version of sour grapes.</p>

<ul>
<li>dave mcclure
<a href="http://500hats.typepad.com" rel="nofollow">http://500hats.typepad.com</a></li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55622</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 05:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55622</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google certainly doesn&#039;t need the myspace headache, sure of they were together they would have an unstoppable 1st place on the page views of th net, but google is doing just fine where it is at. I also think that google taking over myspace may hvae made it more conservative than murdock has, and therefor would have ruined the space making people make a mass exodus to competitor portals like yahoo&#039;s 360.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google certainly doesn&#8217;t need the myspace headache, sure of they were together they would have an unstoppable 1st place on the page views of th net, but google is doing just fine where it is at. I also think that google taking over myspace may hvae made it more conservative than murdock has, and therefor would have ruined the space making people make a mass exodus to competitor portals like yahoo&#8217;s 360.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sc</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55619</link>
		<dc:creator>sc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 05:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/google-and-myspace-woulda-coulda-shoulda/#comment-55619</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It will be interesting to see how Myspace monetizes its popularity (apart from ads). Another monetization opportunity for them is to broker p-2-p e-commerce. Someone who has 20mm profile views could sell a video, album, book or even tickets to a show and Myspace would facilitate this for a commission.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If this is a way to monetize, that means Newcorp will also be in the market for a payments engine. Or will EBay and Newscorp have only one thing (experiments with expensive acquisitions) in common?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see how Myspace monetizes its popularity (apart from ads). Another monetization opportunity for them is to broker p-2-p e-commerce. Someone who has 20mm profile views could sell a video, album, book or even tickets to a show and Myspace would facilitate this for a commission.</p>

<p>If this is a way to monetize, that means Newcorp will also be in the market for a payments engine. Or will EBay and Newscorp have only one thing (experiments with expensive acquisitions) in common?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
