New York Times Wants To Be More Digital

Om Malik, Thursday, June 22, 2006 at 9:05 AM PT Comments (4)

CNN Money’s Paul La Monica thinks it is time for New York Times, the Gray Lady of Journalism to join the merge-or-be-purged trend sweeping across old media. Given the severe under-performance of NYT stock, well, he is right.

The New York Times Co. chief executive officer Janet Robinson has different ideas and wants to do a digital nip-and-tuck. Robinson, and the company are interested in more online investments, and acquisitions. They have stakes in Indeed and Federated Media, for example.

The paper, however has a terrible record. Any remember the JV/investment in The Street.com. That did not work out too well. How about, the latest move of putting its top columnist behind a paid firewall and calling it Times Select?

Times Select has generated just $6 million in sales so far, a rounding error for a company expected to post $3.5 billion in annual revenue this year.

Rating: 50% Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
Print

4 comments so far

June 22nd, 2006
9:31 AM PT
Marlin May said:

Some time ago the NYT was advertising for a “Futurist” - http://www.paidcontent.org/jobs/week200603_26.shtml#054347 - If they’ve filled the position, I’d say that whomever is in the position has their hands full.

June 22nd, 2006
10:11 AM PT
Jacob Varghese said:

First item on the list would be to make the site more interactive.
Allow people to discuss, rate, recommend articles and discuss topics.

Why not even allow users to submit reviews and editorials with quality reviews and editorials being highlighted by an online editor.

June 22nd, 2006
3:47 PM PT
sc said:

A newspaper has to differentiate itself with editorial content and news relevant to a critical mass of consumers. NYTimes is one of the few newspapers doing this (apart from WPO and WSJ). It cannot be compared with other newspapers which are usually poor in editorial content/news or both.

Given the quality of content compared to competitors, I don’t mind paying…

I may be a minority, but I think that an ad-supported free NYTimes site where you have to wade through and get distracted by ads is a huge turnoff.

June 22nd, 2006
6:08 PM PT
SJGMoney said:

Their joint venture/investment in thestreet.com would have worked out just fine if they had some patience. Instead they bought high and sold low.

Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Most Comments

10 Reasons Enterprises Aren’t Ready to Trust the Cloud
Stacey Higginbotham, July 1, 44 comments
Inside Microsoft’s Internet Infrastructure & Its Plans For The Future
Om Malik, June 30, 25 comments
Bandwidth Barons Want More Money for Fewer Bytes
Allan Leinwand, July 3, 23 comments
State of U.S. Broadband: Demand Hits Speed Bumps
Om Malik, July 2, 16 comments
The Real Reason Powerset Sold (Out)
Om Malik, July 2, 15 comments

Highest Rated

Bandwidth Barons Want More Money for Fewer Bytes
Allan Leinwand, July 3, 69%
10 of the Biggest Platform Development Mistakes
Marty Abbott and Michael Fisher, June 30, 66%
Inside Microsoft’s Internet Infrastructure & Its Plans For The Future
Om Malik, June 30, 65%
No More AT&T Callvantage?
Om Malik, July 3, 73%
Meebo’s Jen: How to Find Hard-to-Find Talent
Carleen Hawn, July 5, 71%
Close
E-mail It