Comments on: Nokia, Siemens and Juniper’s Future

By: Bala

Bala — Sat, 02 Dec 2006 22:49:19 +0000

I think so Nokia Siemens Network will compete with Huwaei,Ericsson,etc telecom companies.Big joint reason is of China market high.But the point is that Nokia Siemens product are more reliable, flexible although expensive.

By: Employee Monitoring Software

Employee Monitoring Software — Sat, 04 Nov 2006 07:55:16 +0000

Siemens does not reveal individual profits for its divisions, but Mr. Marcus said that while revenues are growing at the Siemens equipment division, results in the most recent fiscal year were partly boosted by the sale of some of Siemens’s interest in Juniper Networks.

By: Karl

Karl — Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:22:00 +0000

“Lucatel”? Wouldn’t “Alcacent” be more fitting given that “Upon completion of the merger, Alcatel shareholders will own approximately 60 percent of the combined company and Lucent shareholders will own approximately 40 percent of the combined company”? :)

By: Petabro

Petabro — Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:00:03 +0000

The combined entity may be able to get a higher share of the 40m line BSNL contract
Like “Alcatel/Lucent” we believe the primary purpose of this JV is to lower costs
Broadens the product portfolio - another “one source” supplier that offers a wireline and wireless network products. The new “Nokia Siemens Network” JV is an attempt to compete with Ericsson and the about to be merged “Lucatel” (Lightreading, a web based “trade rag” fondly calls the merge entity Lucatel).
History tells us that large technology mergers/JV’s fail. This historical trend will be tested in an environment where corporate leaders, management consultants and investment banks continuously use “The world is flat” theme.

By: Mohammad

Mohammad — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:51:58 +0000

Would it make sense for Nokia/Siemens to buy Juniper?

By: Jesse Kopelman

Jesse Kopelman — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 17:03:39 +0000

DEC, I don’t know that thses mergers have given anyone greater manufacturing power. They have the ability to squeeze Powerwave more, but not cut them out of the picture entirely. There are just so many things that Ericsson, AlcateL, Motorola, Nortel, and Sokia don’t make for themselves. Amplifiers especially is a wierd business. It’s not like even Powerwave makes their amps from scratch — they are full of components from other manufacturers.

Anyway, I think these mergers are actually more about services than hardware. Pressure from China is eating into margins and if WiMax takes off, it will put even more pressure on companies used to being big fish in a small pond. What these vendors want is to lock up the whole life-cycle of the networks, from install through operations to the eventual upgrade to something else. As IBM discovered, that is the only way to survive long term — you can’t do it on manufacturing alone.

By: DEC

DEC — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:57:18 +0000

Another twist on this story is how it will affect the basestation ODMs - Powerwave and ADC being the big two. There’s already been considerable consolidation in that space, and ADC just recently announced the purchase of Andrew Corporation for $US2B. I think the OEM mergers wll reduce the opportunities for the ODMs and ultimately kill them. ADC might survive since they’re getting a lot of other “plumbing” with the Andrew purchase, but Powerwave is basically a pure-play amplifier and transceiver company.

Why would Lucatel, Ericsson or Sokia (Niemens?) outsource their tranceivers after spending tens of billions merging to gain economies of scale?

By: Paul

Paul — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:52:27 +0000

This leaves the rest of Siemens COM. Where do you see the Enterprise Services businesss going. From the announcment its clear that talks are already underway with other partners.

By: petabro

petabro — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 08:48:28 +0000

Wonder if this announcement will cause futher delay in the BSNL tgender.