<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Spreadsheet, Not iRows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52660</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52660</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tom's comments about 2Web Technologies and Om Malik not being able to see the reference. Fourth paragraph down, simple to spot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's the paragraph in full:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The service supports Microsoft Excel documents as well as the CSV format, and is based on technology from a company called 2Web Technologies that Google acquired last year, a company spokesperson told vnunet.com.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know this thread is months old, but hey, thought Tom deserved his moment of fame - he wrote the article after all!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom&#8217;s comments about 2Web Technologies and Om Malik not being able to see the reference. Fourth paragraph down, simple to spot.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the paragraph in full:</p>
<p>The service supports Microsoft Excel documents as well as the CSV format, and is based on technology from a company called 2Web Technologies that Google acquired last year, a company spokesperson told vnunet.com.</p>
<p>I know this thread is months old, but hey, thought Tom deserved his moment of fame - he wrote the article after all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52659</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 02:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52659</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wrote up a quick review of Google Spreadsheets along with some screenshots I made in the process.  You can read it here:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.gobabble.net/2006/06/06/google-spreadsheets-a-first-look/&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote up a quick review of Google Spreadsheets along with some screenshots I made in the process.  You can read it here:</p>
<p> (<a href="http://www.gobabble.net/2006/06/06/google-spreadsheets-a-first-look/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajAT</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52658</link>
		<dc:creator>rajAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52658</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Manual trackback -&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://rajatgupta.wordpress.com/2006/06/06/google-spreadsheet-review/&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manual trackback -</p>
<p> (<a href="http://rajatgupta.wordpress.com/2006/06/06/google-spreadsheet-review/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saurab</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52657</link>
		<dc:creator>saurab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52657</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like a good collaborative product. i think they've done a good job tying it in with their IM service. it'll be interesting to see what the adoption rate is like. definitely not for enterprise users, but would be useful for small-time team projects that require collaboration. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think they'll also integrate this into the gmail interface, if the initial reaction to the product is good.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;GMail is really the one app that can tie a lot of google services together.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a good collaborative product. i think they&#8217;ve done a good job tying it in with their IM service. it&#8217;ll be interesting to see what the adoption rate is like. definitely not for enterprise users, but would be useful for small-time team projects that require collaboration. </p>
<p>I think they&#8217;ll also integrate this into the gmail interface, if the initial reaction to the product is good.</p>
<p>GMail is really the one app that can tie a lot of google services together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52656</link>
		<dc:creator>gb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 12:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52656</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;http://spreadsheet.google.com/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Google spreadsheet is now available for the invited test users!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> (<a href="http://spreadsheet.google.com/" rel="nofollow">link</a>) </p>
<p>The Google spreadsheet is now available for the invited test users!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Dodge</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52655</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Dodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52655</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google is directly competing with open source projects like OpenOffice and Sun's free StarOffice.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google acquired Writely (word processing) and now has a spreadsheet. There was speculation last year that Google would partner with Sun to offer a version of StarOffice. Instead Google has decided to go its own way and compete with OpenOffice and StarOffice.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;C/Net says "Google spreadsheets turns up heat on Excel" I don't think so. Microsoft Office is a powerful, industrial strength, client based, information worker productivity platform. Microsoft Office is moving beyond just being a collection of applications (Word, Excel, PowerPoint) to being a server based application platform for ISVs. Lots of companies run their business on Excel spreadsheets. Now creative start-ups are using Office as a front end User Interface to a whole variety of business applications.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wrote a blog on this subject today http://dondodge.typepad.com/the&lt;em&gt;next&lt;/em&gt;big&lt;em&gt;thing/2006/06/google&lt;/em&gt;competin.html&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is directly competing with open source projects like OpenOffice and Sun&#8217;s free StarOffice.</p>
<p>Google acquired Writely (word processing) and now has a spreadsheet. There was speculation last year that Google would partner with Sun to offer a version of StarOffice. Instead Google has decided to go its own way and compete with OpenOffice and StarOffice.</p>
<p>C/Net says &#8220;Google spreadsheets turns up heat on Excel&#8221; I don&#8217;t think so. Microsoft Office is a powerful, industrial strength, client based, information worker productivity platform. Microsoft Office is moving beyond just being a collection of applications (Word, Excel, PowerPoint) to being a server based application platform for ISVs. Lots of companies run their business on Excel spreadsheets. Now creative start-ups are using Office as a front end User Interface to a whole variety of business applications.</p>
<p>I wrote a blog on this subject today  (<a href="http://dondodge.typepad.com/the" rel="nofollow">link</a>) <em>next</em>big<em>thing/2006/06/google</em>competin.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jarkolicious</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52654</link>
		<dc:creator>jarkolicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52654</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google Spreadsheet&#8230;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Om says that Google Spreadsheet will be launching on Tuesday. If Google does launch this then that means they will have, essentially, rounded out a web based office suite. Ought to be interesting to see if this rumour is true.
&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Spreadsheet&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Om says that Google Spreadsheet will be launching on Tuesday. If Google does launch this then that means they will have, essentially, rounded out a web based office suite. Ought to be interesting to see if this rumour is true.<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52653</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52653</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you want to organise the world’s information, it is a lot easier if it is in your format.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The spreadsheet product isn’t for company budgets and other internal grinding, where you have all the “is my data safe stored outside the building” and “my macro can do more than yours” issues. There might be some Microsoft Office deflections, but that’s surely a bonus.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google HAD to do a spreadsheet because it is simply the best, most flexible, easy to use database currently available. It and Writey are nice big widgets, not serious standalone programs. The future is what you can do with them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A spreadsheet gets data into Google in a slightly more structured format. Think a GUI for GoogleBase. Think integration into Google page creator, then look at anycalc.com, powered by XL2Web, which just happens to have been founded by Jonathan Rochelle, the Google spreadsheet product manager. The analogy is Google Earth and the acquisition of SketchUp.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead of the baroque complexity of Office and its islands of data, give people a tool to use information. Spreadsheet and Writely are just seamless components of that vision. You win by changing the rules, not by a feature-for-feature race with Excel or Word.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to organise the world’s information, it is a lot easier if it is in your format.</p>
<p>The spreadsheet product isn’t for company budgets and other internal grinding, where you have all the “is my data safe stored outside the building” and “my macro can do more than yours” issues. There might be some Microsoft Office deflections, but that’s surely a bonus.</p>
<p>Google HAD to do a spreadsheet because it is simply the best, most flexible, easy to use database currently available. It and Writey are nice big widgets, not serious standalone programs. The future is what you can do with them.</p>
<p>A spreadsheet gets data into Google in a slightly more structured format. Think a GUI for GoogleBase. Think integration into Google page creator, then look at anycalc.com, powered by XL2Web, which just happens to have been founded by Jonathan Rochelle, the Google spreadsheet product manager. The analogy is Google Earth and the acquisition of SketchUp.</p>
<p>Instead of the baroque complexity of Office and its islands of data, give people a tool to use information. Spreadsheet and Writely are just seamless components of that vision. You win by changing the rules, not by a feature-for-feature race with Excel or Word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BurtDensmore</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52652</link>
		<dc:creator>BurtDensmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 07:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52652</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If its a Google , then it has to be a goodie &#8230;Now if they can only come up with a Kick Ass O/S   and blow it out the Window.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If its a Google , then it has to be a goodie &#8230;Now if they can only come up with a Kick Ass O/S   and blow it out the Window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivek puri</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52651</link>
		<dc:creator>vivek puri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 05:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52651</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it can be http://editgrid.com . This is one the best apps out there, with muti-user editing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it can be  (<a href="http://editgrid.com" rel="nofollow">link</a>)  . This is one the best apps out there, with muti-user editing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumit Chachra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52650</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumit Chachra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 04:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52650</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Try http://zohosheet.com/home.do which seems to have beaten Google to the party! :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try  (<a href="http://zohosheet.com/home.do" rel="nofollow">link</a>)  which seems to have beaten Google to the party! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52649</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 02:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52649</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For small companies and individuals, I truly believe the risk for most users is greater on their own desktop than with Google secured storage.  I'm a security fanatic, yet I see such a high risk in security today that a Google app really doubles as a useful tool and a secure mechanism, above and beyond 90% of users.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For small companies and individuals, I truly believe the risk for most users is greater on their own desktop than with Google secured storage.  I&#8217;m a security fanatic, yet I see such a high risk in security today that a Google app really doubles as a useful tool and a secure mechanism, above and beyond 90% of users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52648</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 01:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52648</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tom, not finding the 2Web reference.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, not finding the 2Web reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark evans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52647</link>
		<dc:creator>mark evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 01:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52647</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i guess this means someone else is going to buy dabbledb!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;cheers, mark&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess this means someone else is going to buy dabbledb!</p>
<p>cheers, mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52646</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 01:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52646</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Or even remotely worked on, nevermind remotely stored!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or even remotely worked on, nevermind remotely stored!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52645</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 01:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/06/05/did-google-go-irow/#comment-52645</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No surprise here.  Who will be next, thumbstacks for presentation software or Gliffy for diagramming?  Then what about MS Access or Project-like apps?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Security will be a concern for enterprises as a lot of companies do not allow their documents to be remotely stored.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No surprise here.  Who will be next, thumbstacks for presentation software or Gliffy for diagramming?  Then what about MS Access or Project-like apps?</p>
<p>Security will be a concern for enterprises as a lot of companies do not allow their documents to be remotely stored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
