7 Comments

Summary:

M2Z Networks, a wireless broadband start-up backed by Sandhill Road venture capitalists – Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, Charles River Ventures and Redpoint Ventures – proposes to build a twin-purpose nationwide wireless broadband network, that will provide the third option for broadband services. The cable and […]

M2Z Networks, a wireless broadband start-up backed by Sandhill Road venture capitalists – Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, Charles River Ventures and Redpoint Ventures – proposes to build a twin-purpose nationwide wireless broadband network, that will provide the third option for broadband services. The cable and phone companies have a virtual duopoly in the US. M2Z claims it can raise $400 million to help build and operate the network.

Mind you, these are just details from the FCC filings, and the company hasn’t made any statement. The company in a filing with FCC says it it was to get the soon to be vacated 2155 MHz to 2175 MHz spectrum for free for 15 years, it would offer universal broadband access nationwide, and in exchange it would hand over 5% of its gross revenues from its premium broadband service. In addition, it will give free 512 kilobits per second wireless access to one and all, which will be supported by advertising. According to Silicon Beat, M2Z says it can build this network in 10 years. ( I am not even going to get into the seemingly lopsided nature of this proposal….not up until I have more details on how the math is supposed to work!)


M2Z is the brain-child of FCC’s wireless bureau’s former head honcho John Muleta and Milo Medin, who in previous life had helped create and build the @Home Networks. (You can read all about that in Broadbandits: Inside The $750 Billion Telecom Heist). Milo, last time I saw him, was parked inside Charles River’s offices and was tooling around with Myth TV. Who knew he was cooking up yet another big network.

The blue-sky proposals such as this one, always make me queasy. It is easy to plan such massive scale networks, except when reality comes knocking. @Home comes to mind. What was the name of that ill-fated nationwide WiFi network backed by IBM, AT&T (the original), and a score of others.. Cometa was it?

Though earnest in its desire, the M2Z plan, is quite likely to be stuck in the quagmire called the Beltway. The spectrum owners – the wireless phone companies and others like Clearwire – would ensure that this plan doesn’t even get off the ground. Others who are planning to buy spectrum in a forthcoming auction would raise holy hell, if this deal was approved. But more importantly, the duopoly with its enormous clout in DC, is going to work hard to ensure that this remains a Silicon Valley dream.

As I have said earlier, between the wireless broadband utopia and Silicon Valley, there is Washington D.C.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Jesse Kopelman Thursday, May 18, 2006

    I like how they give the FCC a month to decide on their proposal, but themselves 10 years to actually build the network (it is pretty well established from past projects like AT&T Wireless’ GSM overlay that it would only take 2 years to build a nationwide network). Are any of the NextWave guys secretly involved in this?

  2. Om:

    Since you posted, quotes in today’s NY Times from Charles River associates make this sound like the Chinese Internet @home complete with domain restrictions. I posted more on that (http://blog.tomevslin.com/2006/05/m2zthechinese.html) and am interested in your reaction.

  3. Sean C. McCord Friday, May 26, 2006

    Once again, the FCC appears to be the problem, not the solution.

    Right as new wireless technologies and companies are starting to make headway in the market, the FCC wants to bundle up the whole market and sell it off to a single third monopoly! This is insanity.

    I can understand falling for the carrot of having free wireless internet access, but look at it really. It is nothing but another governmental sanction for another big monopoly.

    Wireless companies are already starting to come online, from WiMax and Canopy networks, to revamped microwave relays. Dozens of companies already exist, are giving great deals even in the early-adopter phase, and are growing every month. This monopolistic license would do nothing but freeze this competitive growth.

  4. Jerry Brito (dot com) Tuesday, November 14, 2006

    Why not have a comparative hearing while you’re at it?…

    Today there are reports that a startup headed by former FCC Wireless Bureau chief John Muleta and @Home founder Milo Medin has asked the FCC to give it a spectrum license to offer a national wireless broadband service. No auction,…

  5. James Seng’s Blog Sunday, November 19, 2006

    Nation-wide Free High speed WiMAX for United State…

    A few months ago, a friend (who requested to rename nameless) forward me a website called M2Z. It was already covered by GigaOM.

  6. GigaOM M2Z Networks Sticks It To The Martin Man « Wednesday, August 15, 2007

    [...] I have been skeptical of this broadband utopia for various reasons including the blue-sky nature of the network. It is not a trivial task, fraught with risks. In addition, there is no clarity on technology used for this network. More importantly, there is this little bit in their application, Mandatory Filtering of Indecent and Obscene Material, which seems to be a bit anti-Internet to me. My reservations aside, M2Z shouldn’t be denied its due process, and that’s precisely what FCC Chairman Martin seems to be doing. [...]

  7. Carriers Looking to Block Free Wireless Broadband? – GigaOM Thursday, June 5, 2008

    [...] wanted to build a free wireless network using the same frequencies except it didn’t want to pay for the spectrum. The FCC ignored their request, so M2Z turned around and sued. They have to be feeling a tad [...]

Comments have been disabled for this post