<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Tech Not Really A Threat to CNet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumpY!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grumpY!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 22:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;wow, ytech is just drivel. design by committee of 9000 employees. uh, just dreadful.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, ytech is just drivel. design by committee of 9000 employees. uh, just dreadful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JLee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 22:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;See Mathew gets it. He obviously understand the Feng Shui of website design. Maybe Yahoo should sign all of us Om lurkers on for consultation gig before releasing the next version. :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We&#039;ll call it Trading Webspaces&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Mathew gets it. He obviously understand the Feng Shui of website design. Maybe Yahoo should sign all of us Om lurkers on for consultation gig before releasing the next version. :)</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll call it Trading Webspaces&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 22:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The whole thing looks like a giant brochure.  Is that what people want?  I don&#039;t think so -- but I could be wrong.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole thing looks like a giant brochure.  Is that what people want?  I don&#8217;t think so &#8212; but I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JLee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 21:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Yahoo&#039;s Tech site looks a bit too cluttered with junky ads. Looking at it gives me an eyesore and makes me want to close the browser. Repeat after me&#8230; less is more, less is more&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The secret is space, not compacting every piece of eye candy you can lay your hands on like you were living in your old dorm room. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Somehow I think the people who designed this site still think they are back in &#8230; oh nevermind&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo&#8217;s Tech site looks a bit too cluttered with junky ads. Looking at it gives me an eyesore and makes me want to close the browser. Repeat after me&#8230; less is more, less is more&#8230;</p>
<p>The secret is space, not compacting every piece of eye candy you can lay your hands on like you were living in your old dorm room. </p>
<p>Somehow I think the people who designed this site still think they are back in &#8230; oh nevermind&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esme Vos</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Esme Vos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 20:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think the Yahoo Tech site looks dreadful. Is that the best they can do? Atrocious!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Yahoo Tech site looks dreadful. Is that the best they can do? Atrocious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 18:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;talking about intelligent reviews - i find most of the gadget blogs - engadget, phone scoop, and others like them do a much better job and are more indepth and actually fun to read. i think c/net needs to go in that direction.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>talking about intelligent reviews &#8211; i find most of the gadget blogs &#8211; engadget, phone scoop, and others like them do a much better job and are more indepth and actually fun to read. i think c/net needs to go in that direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristaps Kaupe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristaps Kaupe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 18:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;It (Y! Tech) has some problems with Opera 8.52 web browser.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It (Y! Tech) has some problems with Opera 8.52 web browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 18:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;No mention of Howard Forums, Tom&#039;s Hardware, AVS Forum? These are where you get real information. Now if someone could slap a better UI on them . . .&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No mention of Howard Forums, Tom&#8217;s Hardware, AVS Forum? These are where you get real information. Now if someone could slap a better UI on them . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 17:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;CNet has depth?  that&#039;s news to me&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNet has depth?  that&#8217;s news to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric B</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117520</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 16:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Uh oh&#8230; Don&#039;t let C&#124;Net see that forward slash! ;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyways&#8230; ontopic now: C&#124;Net&#039;s consumer reviews have always been a starting point for me, but once you get into more technical components I find newegg&#039;s customer reviews to be the most helpful.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;d be great to have another quality source of tech reviews, especially one that wouldn&#039;t treat everyone&#039;s reviews as equal. A system that helps to identify more &quot;intelligent&quot; reviewers would be greatly welcome.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh oh&#8230; Don&#8217;t let C|Net see that forward slash! ;)</p>
<p>Anyways&#8230; ontopic now: C|Net&#8217;s consumer reviews have always been a starting point for me, but once you get into more technical components I find newegg&#8217;s customer reviews to be the most helpful.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be great to have another quality source of tech reviews, especially one that wouldn&#8217;t treat everyone&#8217;s reviews as equal. A system that helps to identify more &#8220;intelligent&#8221; reviewers would be greatly welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Buckley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerald Buckley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 14:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I was furiously trying to close the annoying ad. So, yeah, I totally agree&#8230; just an ad play and I&#039;ll keep enjoying c&#124;net (Thanks Mr. Semel but not this time.)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was furiously trying to close the annoying ad. So, yeah, I totally agree&#8230; just an ad play and I&#8217;ll keep enjoying c|net (Thanks Mr. Semel but not this time.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aye</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aye]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 13:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I agree with the advertorial comment.  Reading about 6 or 7 articles gave me the impression that it wasn&#039;t that objective.  I can&#039;t see visiting it again.  I wish a better competitor to CNET would come along however.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the advertorial comment.  Reading about 6 or 7 articles gave me the impression that it wasn&#8217;t that objective.  I can&#8217;t see visiting it again.  I wish a better competitor to CNET would come along however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson West</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackson West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 10:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;If it matters, I&#039;ve done work for both companies on the content side.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CNet has made a couple of interesting content moves in the past few months (think Consumating, Chowhound and Chow), and the word on the street is that they&#039;re hiring like gangbusters.  For Yahoo, it&#039;s very interesting to be in the position of providing &#039;digital lifestlye&#039; services &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; commentary on said technology and trends.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think that larger companies, like CNet and Yahoo, would be smart to specialize, and spin off more of their successful projects into smaller, more agile companies.  That could just be my radicalism in the face of media mergers and &#039;portalization&#039; of the Internet.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The seeds are planted by small apps, and properties purchased by CNet, Yahoo, Google and even News Corp have remained relatively untouched, for now.  It&#039;s almost like the big techies are operating incubators to a certain extent.  If I was Yahoo or CNet, I would rather have 50% in a concern that rised or sank on their own merits than 100% in a bold, new initiative that failed and tarred the company.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But maybe that&#039;s just crazy talk.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it matters, I&#8217;ve done work for both companies on the content side.</p>
<p>CNet has made a couple of interesting content moves in the past few months (think Consumating, Chowhound and Chow), and the word on the street is that they&#8217;re hiring like gangbusters.  For Yahoo, it&#8217;s very interesting to be in the position of providing &#8216;digital lifestlye&#8217; services <em>and</em> commentary on said technology and trends.</p>
<p>I think that larger companies, like CNet and Yahoo, would be smart to specialize, and spin off more of their successful projects into smaller, more agile companies.  That could just be my radicalism in the face of media mergers and &#8216;portalization&#8217; of the Internet.</p>
<p>The seeds are planted by small apps, and properties purchased by CNet, Yahoo, Google and even News Corp have remained relatively untouched, for now.  It&#8217;s almost like the big techies are operating incubators to a certain extent.  If I was Yahoo or CNet, I would rather have 50% in a concern that rised or sank on their own merits than 100% in a bold, new initiative that failed and tarred the company.</p>
<p>But maybe that&#8217;s just crazy talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: met</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117516</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[met]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 10:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/30/yahoo-tech-not-really-a-threat-to-cnet/#comment-117516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Well I hope someone will be a threat to CNet. It would also work for me if CNet percieves Yahooo as a threat :)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I hope someone will be a threat to CNet. It would also work for me if CNet percieves Yahooo as a threat :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

