<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SF WiFi&#8230; &amp; the winner Is&#8230;Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:54:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46737</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46737</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dennis, how is HSPA going to offer 4-5 times the bandwidth? Max badwidth for a HSPA radio is &lt; 20 Mbps. Max bandwidth for a 802.11g radio is 54 Mbps. Now neither will reach anywhere close their capabilities in the real world, but it&#039;s safe to say a well designed WiFi network has an advantage in raw bandwidth over any 3G technology. As always, actual speeds to the user depend more on implementation than hardware.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, how is HSPA going to offer 4-5 times the bandwidth? Max badwidth for a HSPA radio is &lt; 20 Mbps. Max bandwidth for a 802.11g radio is 54 Mbps. Now neither will reach anywhere close their capabilities in the real world, but it&#8217;s safe to say a well designed WiFi network has an advantage in raw bandwidth over any 3G technology. As always, actual speeds to the user depend more on implementation than hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson West</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46736</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46736</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google has made noises about open-network support for consumer wifi devices.  And I admit their vpn softs are probably pretty secure (as long as you ultimately trust Google).  But the point I&#039;m trying to make is that The City of San Francisco is asking certain things of the provider that Google/Earthlink aren&#039;t promising to deliver, yet they won the right to negotiate the contract.  Seems fishy, but then so much local politics does.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has made noises about open-network support for consumer wifi devices.  And I admit their vpn softs are probably pretty secure (as long as you ultimately trust Google).  But the point I&#8217;m trying to make is that The City of San Francisco is asking certain things of the provider that Google/Earthlink aren&#8217;t promising to deliver, yet they won the right to negotiate the contract.  Seems fishy, but then so much local politics does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Evans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46735</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 00:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46735</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The contengency of WiFi and loading of the system assumes bursting [inet up and downloads] not continuous duty telco like seizing the channel. To do Voip reliably [more than a few at a time per node would require a greater bandwidth and or more robustness [low latency and no/lower packet loss]&#8230;maybe you could listen to a minute of commercials, per minute used in telephony?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While you are hanging a big box on a light pole who knows how many transceivers [slots for] are in the box? 700,2.1, 2.3, 2.45, 2.6-2.7, 5.8?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why I think the CAPEX/OPEX will be 50% higher than budget.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Using a 10 year payback as one of the posters did is way too long. Technology will change every 3 years at least for the paying subs&#8230;as HSPA  will offer 4-5x the bandwidth for $40&#8230;2-3 years in.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The contengency of WiFi and loading of the system assumes bursting [inet up and downloads] not continuous duty telco like seizing the channel. To do Voip reliably [more than a few at a time per node would require a greater bandwidth and or more robustness [low latency and no/lower packet loss]&#8230;maybe you could listen to a minute of commercials, per minute used in telephony?</p>
<p>While you are hanging a big box on a light pole who knows how many transceivers [slots for] are in the box? 700,2.1, 2.3, 2.45, 2.6-2.7, 5.8?</p>
<p>Why I think the CAPEX/OPEX will be 50% higher than budget.</p>
<p>Using a 10 year payback as one of the posters did is way too long. Technology will change every 3 years at least for the paying subs&#8230;as HSPA  will offer 4-5x the bandwidth for $40&#8230;2-3 years in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObzerV</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46734</link>
		<dc:creator>ObzerV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 20:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46734</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Can this network be somehow connected to MindSpring VOIP or MVNO (Helio)? I can see VOIP happening, but am not sure about Helio.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can this network be somehow connected to MindSpring VOIP or MVNO (Helio)? I can see VOIP happening, but am not sure about Helio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46733</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 07:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46733</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Niklos asked above &quot;Why is this not happening in Europe?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Quick answer is that it - or something similar - IS happening in Europe. Witness the UK joint venture between PIPEX and Intel - http://www.nice-ventures.com/blog/home.php?/archives/167-WiMAX-in-the-UK.html&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Niklos asked above &#8220;Why is this not happening in Europe?&#8221;</p>
<p>Quick answer is that it &#8211; or something similar &#8211; IS happening in Europe. Witness the UK joint venture between PIPEX and Intel &#8211; <a href="http://www.nice-ventures.com/blog/home.php?/archives/167-WiMAX-in-the-UK.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nice-ventures.com/blog/home.php?/archives/167-WiMAX-in-the-UK.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc M. Fox</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46732</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc M. Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 01:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46732</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hmm&#8230; I&#039;m wondering about Privacy related stuff&#8230; Google tracking everyone&#8230; Even location wise&#8230; That sounds interesting to me&#8230; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By the way, a very interesting, related analysis&#8230; Take a look:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neomarketing.tv/archives/analyzing_googles_strategic_direction_or_google_vs_mighty_achilles_who_got_killed_with_a_little_arrow_in_the_foot.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Analyzing Google&#039;s strategic direction (or, Google VS. mighty achilles who got killed with a little arrow in the foot) &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm&#8230; I&#8217;m wondering about Privacy related stuff&#8230; Google tracking everyone&#8230; Even location wise&#8230; That sounds interesting to me&#8230; </p>
<p>By the way, a very interesting, related analysis&#8230; Take a look:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.neomarketing.tv/archives/analyzing_googles_strategic_direction_or_google_vs_mighty_achilles_who_got_killed_with_a_little_arrow_in_the_foot.php" rel="nofollow"> Analyzing Google&#8217;s strategic direction (or, Google VS. mighty achilles who got killed with a little arrow in the foot) </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wai Yip Tung</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46731</link>
		<dc:creator>Wai Yip Tung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46731</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/14274304.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mercury News&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;i&gt;an Earthlink spokesman estimated that the Google-Earthlink plan would cost $6 million to $7 million to install, and $15 million for maintenance, billing and upgrades over the next 10 years.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If they got 10,000 subscribers to pay the $20 for 10 years, it would be 10000x20x12x10=24mil. This already cover the cost. The profit from ads could be even bigger.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/14274304.htm" rel="nofollow">Mercury News</a><br />
<i>an Earthlink spokesman estimated that the Google-Earthlink plan would cost $6 million to $7 million to install, and $15 million for maintenance, billing and upgrades over the next 10 years.</i></p>
</p>
<p>If they got 10,000 subscribers to pay the $20 for 10 years, it would be 10000&#215;20x12&#215;10=24mil. This already cover the cost. The profit from ads could be even bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: home business information</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46730</link>
		<dc:creator>home business information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 16:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46730</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Citywide WI-FI is fantastic if your don&#039;t have to be a slave to any particular location/s.  I wish it would be nationwide.
in fact, why not worldwide!  I like to spend time in the Jamaica. I also like to take my laptop with me but find it difficult to get a decent internet connection appart from going to the local phone company&#039;s store, cyber cafe, or some place that only have dial up connection.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Run the thing through a satellite if you have to, but please give me my broadband wireless connection worldwide so I can have fun while I work!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citywide WI-FI is fantastic if your don&#8217;t have to be a slave to any particular location/s.  I wish it would be nationwide.<br />
in fact, why not worldwide!  I like to spend time in the Jamaica. I also like to take my laptop with me but find it difficult to get a decent internet connection appart from going to the local phone company&#8217;s store, cyber cafe, or some place that only have dial up connection.  </p>
<p>Run the thing through a satellite if you have to, but please give me my broadband wireless connection worldwide so I can have fun while I work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nyquist Capital</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46729</link>
		<dc:creator>Nyquist Capital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46729</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;San Francisco MuniFi Economics&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;San Francisco gave the green light to Google (GOOG) and Earthlink (ELNK) to offer wi-fi throughout the city. You&#8217;ll get free 300kb/s ad-supported service from Google, or $20 a month for 1Mb/s ISP service from Earthlink.
Total capex is $15MM to i&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>San Francisco MuniFi Economics</strong></p>
<p>San Francisco gave the green light to Google (GOOG) and Earthlink (ELNK) to offer wi-fi throughout the city. You&#8217;ll get free 300kb/s ad-supported service from Google, or $20 a month for 1Mb/s ISP service from Earthlink.<br />
Total capex is $15MM to i&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46728</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46728</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve got to acknowledge a wonderful author and visionary in the voip/wireless area.  His name is Frank Ohrtman.  I read his book Wifi Handbook in which he laid out the future of wireless technologies.  This was over 3 years ago and he has been right on.  I can&#039;t wait to read his next book on newer technologies such as IMS, Wimax, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to acknowledge a wonderful author and visionary in the voip/wireless area.  His name is Frank Ohrtman.  I read his book Wifi Handbook in which he laid out the future of wireless technologies.  This was over 3 years ago and he has been right on.  I can&#8217;t wait to read his next book on newer technologies such as IMS, Wimax, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niklas</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46727</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 07:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/04/05/san-francisco-wifi-and-the-winner-isgoogle/#comment-46727</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why is this not happening in Europe?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this not happening in Europe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
