<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook: Too Late For $750 Million?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harmony Internet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-725876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harmony Internet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-725876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RT @tsohost: It&#039;s interesting to look back and see what &quot;experts&quot; thought about the future of facebook in 2006 http://t.co/OQBUEd0j]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT @tsohost: It&#8217;s interesting to look back and see what &#8220;experts&#8221; thought about the future of facebook in 2006 <a href="http://t.co/OQBUEd0j" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/OQBUEd0j</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Miller</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-725503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 03:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-725503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note to self. Pontificating about tech is difficult. From March 2006 --&gt; Facebook: Too Late For $750 Million? http://t.co/V3INRlVy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note to self. Pontificating about tech is difficult. From March 2006 &#8211;&gt; Facebook: Too Late For $750 Million? <a href="http://t.co/V3INRlVy" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/V3INRlVy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tsohost</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-724973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsohost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 21:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-724973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s interesting to look back and see what &quot;experts&quot; thought about the future of facebook in 2006 http://t.co/OQBUEd0j]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting to look back and see what &#8220;experts&#8221; thought about the future of facebook in 2006 <a href="http://t.co/OQBUEd0j" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/OQBUEd0j</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dark Side of the Late 2009 M&#38;A Surge &#124; Family Learning Center</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Dark Side of the Late 2009 M&#38;A Surge &#124; Family Learning Center]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] million for your Web 2.0 app today? Consider that Facebook—a company that was ridiculed by the press and analysts for not selling for $1 billion or less back in 2006 —has already bid $500 million [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] million for your Web 2.0 app today? Consider that Facebook—a company that was ridiculed by the press and analysts for not selling for $1 billion or less back in 2006 —has already bid $500 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dark Side of the Late 2009 M&#38;A Surge</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Dark Side of the Late 2009 M&#38;A Surge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 05:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] million for your Web 2.0 app today? Consider that Facebook—a company that was ridiculed by the press and analysts for not selling for $1 billion or less back in 2006 —has already bid $500 million [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] million for your Web 2.0 app today? Consider that Facebook—a company that was ridiculed by the press and analysts for not selling for $1 billion or less back in 2006 —has already bid $500 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Email Harvester Launches, Turns Down $750 Million Offer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Email Harvester Launches, Turns Down $750 Million Offer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] this week, we turned down a $750 million offer from an unnamed company, instead demanding $2 billion and a free pony (allegedly). We&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this week, we turned down a $750 million offer from an unnamed company, instead demanding $2 billion and a free pony (allegedly). We&#8217;re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 007</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;what a bunch of BS!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a bunch of BS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jas</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I wonder who can give better advice. If facebook had followed the advice in this article, would they be the company they are today. Was opening to non-core audience a bad step? In hindsight, no.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So then, who/how can the future be predicted?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder who can give better advice. If facebook had followed the advice in this article, would they be the company they are today. Was opening to non-core audience a bad step? In hindsight, no.</p>
<p>So then, who/how can the future be predicted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 01:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;HAHAHA&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;talk about eating your words...
15 billion ring a bell?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAHA</p>
<p>talk about eating your words&#8230;<br />
15 billion ring a bell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 04:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;i bet they are glad they didn&#039;t listen you guys now that they are worth like 15 billion and sells a small 1.6% for $240 million lol to microsoft&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i bet they are glad they didn&#8217;t listen you guys now that they are worth like 15 billion and sells a small 1.6% for $240 million lol to microsoft</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kasi-Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can you be too pessimistic when discussing Facebook&#8217;s money?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kasi-Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can you be too pessimistic when discussing Facebook&#8217;s money?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] offered 750 million US-$ in 2006. Some claim it could be worth 100 billion US-Dollars See Jason McCabe [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] offered 750 million US-$ in 2006. Some claim it could be worth 100 billion US-Dollars See Jason McCabe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charl</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 14:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;How wrong was Om Malik with his post HAHAH.. I cant believe this is still up&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Zuck has proved him wrong with EVERYTHING he said above&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How wrong was Om Malik with his post HAHAH.. I cant believe this is still up</p>
<p>Zuck has proved him wrong with EVERYTHING he said above</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 14:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;boy wasn&#039;t the original poster wrong&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>boy wasn&#8217;t the original poster wrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 22:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Interesting discussion, but I think the Facebook owners are smart for passing on the 750 million.  I think they could easily sell it for a billion, but any more than that is being greedy.  I am still upset about the fact that Facebook has allowed high schoolers, because it lowers Facebook&#039;s credibility.  That is the big edge Facebook has over Myspace.  Credibility.  See with Myspace any spammer, webcam girl, hacker or 12 year old can join, but at least with Facebook I have to have a student email account to register.  Facebook is much organized as well.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion, but I think the Facebook owners are smart for passing on the 750 million.  I think they could easily sell it for a billion, but any more than that is being greedy.  I am still upset about the fact that Facebook has allowed high schoolers, because it lowers Facebook&#8217;s credibility.  That is the big edge Facebook has over Myspace.  Credibility.  See with Myspace any spammer, webcam girl, hacker or 12 year old can join, but at least with Facebook I have to have a student email account to register.  Facebook is much organized as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oyvind on Facebook</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oyvind on Facebook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] It&#8217;s fun and quite addictive. I certainly can understand why the Facebook owners turned down a $750 million offer. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s fun and quite addictive. I certainly can understand why the Facebook owners turned down a $750 million offer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptainTO</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CaptainTO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/should-facebook-have-taken-that-750-million-offer/#comment-116524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Almost a full year later from this post, care to comment again on facebook&#039;s trajectory over the last year? http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?site0=facebook.com&amp;site1=&amp;site2=&amp;site3=&amp;site4=&amp;y=r&amp;z=1&amp;h=300&amp;w=500&amp;range=1y&amp;size=Medium&amp;url=facebook.com&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know it is always tough to predict outcomes, but most should know by now that alexa graphs are a lot like stock charts, analyzing the mini trends can lead to inaccurate predictions. To look at these properly we need some sort of index value to remove the global variations in usage.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It seems the opening of the site has not caused a major decline in usage and their geographic expansion plans may counter any plateauing we will see in the US market.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Any comments on valuation? This site is actually profitable unlike many others.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost a full year later from this post, care to comment again on facebook&#8217;s trajectory over the last year? <a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?site0=facebook.com&#038;site1=&#038;site2=&#038;site3=&#038;site4=&#038;y=r&#038;z=1&#038;h=300&#038;w=500&#038;range=1y&#038;size=Medium&#038;url=facebook.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?site0=facebook.com&#038;site1=&#038;site2=&#038;site3=&#038;site4=&#038;y=r&#038;z=1&#038;h=300&#038;w=500&#038;range=1y&#038;size=Medium&#038;url=facebook.com</a></p>
<p>I know it is always tough to predict outcomes, but most should know by now that alexa graphs are a lot like stock charts, analyzing the mini trends can lead to inaccurate predictions. To look at these properly we need some sort of index value to remove the global variations in usage.</p>
<p>It seems the opening of the site has not caused a major decline in usage and their geographic expansion plans may counter any plateauing we will see in the US market.</p>
<p>Any comments on valuation? This site is actually profitable unlike many others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

