<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Really Bad Apple Phone Rumor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:46:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 03:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll take any of your &quot;no iPhone&quot; bets, if you give me 15 months to launch.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why WOULDN&#039;T Apple do an iPhone?  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They almost have to.  Phones will infringe on their iPod business ultimately if they don&#039;t, and they&#039;re now addicted to the shot in the growth arm that the iPod has given them.  Apple needs to continue growing.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take any of your &#8220;no iPhone&#8221; bets, if you give me 15 months to launch.</p>
<p>Why WOULDN&#8217;T Apple do an iPhone?  </p>
<p>They almost have to.  Phones will infringe on their iPod business ultimately if they don&#8217;t, and they&#8217;re now addicted to the shot in the growth arm that the iPod has given them.  Apple needs to continue growing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I agree Om, There is a line with rumors&#8230; But a bad (stolen) mockup of the &#039;iPhone&#039; and a $2 Billion buyout for Facebook are on par in my books ;)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Om, There is a line with rumors&#8230; But a bad (stolen) mockup of the &#8216;iPhone&#8217; and a $2 Billion buyout for Facebook are on par in my books ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Johnson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;That mock-up is old as dust and was put together on one site with loads of mockups (bad thing is this isn&#039;t even the best one!!). My company sent it to me a while back to consider making something of that fashion but for more of a VoIP\iPOD look type device. I used that same excact picture for my proposal almost 3 months ago. Talk about wanting to be in the spotlight for news, that is the
lamest rumor to date about an iPhone, but hey I guess they are more desperate than housewives these days for iPOD news. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Links to come for that mock-up site.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That mock-up is old as dust and was put together on one site with loads of mockups (bad thing is this isn&#8217;t even the best one!!). My company sent it to me a while back to consider making something of that fashion but for more of a VoIP\iPOD look type device. I used that same excact picture for my proposal almost 3 months ago. Talk about wanting to be in the spotlight for news, that is the<br />
lamest rumor to date about an iPhone, but hey I guess they are more desperate than housewives these days for iPOD news. </p>
<p>Links to come for that mock-up site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Siry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Siry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Just thought of something&#8230; If the above iPhone was made of iPod-grade materials, then it would scratch faster than a junkie with chicken pox. Which means big bucks would go to whichever accessory maker comes up with a case that easily accommodates the sliding function.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought of something&#8230; If the above iPhone was made of iPod-grade materials, then it would scratch faster than a junkie with chicken pox. Which means big bucks would go to whichever accessory maker comes up with a case that easily accommodates the sliding function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saul Weiner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saul Weiner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Man, what people will do nowadays for traffic&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, what people will do nowadays for traffic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;MacOSRumors is, hands down, my favorite source of fake-believe reporting.  Also love their continual &quot;financial problems&quot;, bizarre site malfunctions, and ever present &quot;story developing - check back soon!!!&quot; tag lines.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MacOSRumors is, hands down, my favorite source of fake-believe reporting.  Also love their continual &#8220;financial problems&#8221;, bizarre site malfunctions, and ever present &#8220;story developing &#8211; check back soon!!!&#8221; tag lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hey Gig, the first link you mention as to be claiming to be attempting to pass-off the phone image that appeared in your magazine as the actual iPhone is a little inaccurate.  If you go read that link a little closer, you&#039;ll notice the last paragraph that states, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;We&#039;re sure that the real thing will differ considerably from this mockup, but thus far&#8230;it is by a long shot the closest thing we have seen to the information our sources provide us.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If Apple comes out with a phone even half as cool as that thing, I&#039;m dumping my treo 650 like a hot potato!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Gig, the first link you mention as to be claiming to be attempting to pass-off the phone image that appeared in your magazine as the actual iPhone is a little inaccurate.  If you go read that link a little closer, you&#8217;ll notice the last paragraph that states, </p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re sure that the real thing will differ considerably from this mockup, but thus far&#8230;it is by a long shot the closest thing we have seen to the information our sources provide us.&#8221;</p>
<p>If Apple comes out with a phone even half as cool as that thing, I&#8217;m dumping my treo 650 like a hot potato!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;but matt, the big difference is bad rumors and &quot;really&quot; bad rumors. sometimes even rumors cross the line. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but matt, the big difference is bad rumors and &#8220;really&#8221; bad rumors. sometimes even rumors cross the line. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viperteq</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[viperteq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;This is by far my favorite quote in the article:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;We&#039;re sure that the real thing will differ considerably from this mockup, but thus far&#8230;it is by a long shot the closest thing we have seen to the information our sources provide us.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is by far my favorite quote in the article:</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re sure that the real thing will differ considerably from this mockup, but thus far&#8230;it is by a long shot the closest thing we have seen to the information our sources provide us.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/really-bad-apple-phone-rumor/#comment-116479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The bad rumors are what make being an Apple follower fun.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bad rumors are what make being an Apple follower fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

