<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Finance Disappoints</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:08:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Initial Reactions To Google Finance &#124; DesiPundit</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Initial Reactions To Google Finance &#124; DesiPundit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Like all Google launches, Google Finance is also being hotly debated in the Blogosphere. Om Malik gives his verdict. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Like all Google launches, Google Finance is also being hotly debated in the Blogosphere. Om Malik gives his verdict. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruby Web</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruby Web]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All reviews I&#039;ve read on &quot;Google Finance&quot; aren&#039;t that great. It seems like Google under delivered on this one. Let&#039;s wait and see what they intend on doing about the negative response.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All reviews I&#8217;ve read on &#8220;Google Finance&#8221; aren&#8217;t that great. It seems like Google under delivered on this one. Let&#8217;s wait and see what they intend on doing about the negative response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Portals Or Bloatals? &#124; DUNYA - WORLD - THEME - MUSİC - İSLAMİC</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Portals Or Bloatals? &#124; DUNYA - WORLD - THEME - MUSİC - İSLAMİC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the new Google Finance, especially the chart overlays and integration with other Google products. I found the new product lacking a few of my favorite features from Yahoo! Finance such as institutional holdings and insider [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the new Google Finance, especially the chart overlays and integration with other Google products. I found the new product lacking a few of my favorite features from Yahoo! Finance such as institutional holdings and insider [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Portals Or Bloatals? &#124; 34mp3.com</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Portals Or Bloatals? &#124; 34mp3.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] the new Google Finance, especially the chart overlays and integration with other Google products. I found the new product lacking a few of my favorite features from Yahoo! Finance such as institutional holdings and insider [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the new Google Finance, especially the chart overlays and integration with other Google products. I found the new product lacking a few of my favorite features from Yahoo! Finance such as institutional holdings and insider [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Turner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Turner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think it&#039;s fair to say that Google Finance is still lacking. Yahoo! just seems much easier to use. Anyone actually have Google Finance as their main market portal?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s fair to say that Google Finance is still lacking. Yahoo! just seems much easier to use. Anyone actually have Google Finance as their main market portal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I have to echo the others in that I&#039;m not seeing what&#039;s so bad about it. The flash chart with news correlations is a good way to get a feel for a stock, the design is &lt;em&gt;far&lt;/em&gt; more attractive than Yahoos (due primarily to lack of noisy ads) and the real time suggestions are helpful if you don&#039;t know the ticker symbol.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to echo the others in that I&#8217;m not seeing what&#8217;s so bad about it. The flash chart with news correlations is a good way to get a feel for a stock, the design is <em>far</em> more attractive than Yahoos (due primarily to lack of noisy ads) and the real time suggestions are helpful if you don&#8217;t know the ticker symbol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Board</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google Board]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;You got linked from the official Google Blog :)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got linked from the official Google Blog :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;ambuj, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;i think you should listen to my latest podcast to get a complete low down. i just did not feel like writing the whole thing down anyway. i think you will get a better understanding of where i am coming from.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://onpodsessions.com&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ambuj, </p>
<p>i think you should listen to my latest podcast to get a complete low down. i just did not feel like writing the whole thing down anyway. i think you will get a better understanding of where i am coming from.</p>
<p><a href="http://onpodsessions.com" rel="nofollow">http://onpodsessions.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambuj Saxena</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ambuj Saxena]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;After reading your post, I couldn&#039;t really understand what makes you think that Google Finance is &quot;bad&quot;. You didn&#039;t like the look, but that&#039;s very subjective. I didn&#039;t find that a turning off factor. Is there inherently bad about Google Finance that made you give this &quot;thumbs down&quot; vote?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading your post, I couldn&#8217;t really understand what makes you think that Google Finance is &#8220;bad&#8221;. You didn&#8217;t like the look, but that&#8217;s very subjective. I didn&#8217;t find that a turning off factor. Is there inherently bad about Google Finance that made you give this &#8220;thumbs down&#8221; vote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 03:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/21/google-finance-needs-some-muscle/#comment-116187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Google Finance is a disappointing mess.  Try putting in the ticker symbol &quot;SVI&quot; - you should get Services Acquisition Corp. International.  Instead, you get Strategic Vista International, which trades as SVI on the Toronto exchange. Putting in the company name doesn&#039;t yield the company either. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now, put in &quot;PPS.&quot;  Google Finance is currently showing it&#039;s price at $1.57, even though it closed over $45.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if someone made a poor decision based on their incredibly faulty data (wrong company?  price off by a multiple of almost 30?!?) and tried to hold them legally responsible.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Finance is a disappointing mess.  Try putting in the ticker symbol &#8220;SVI&#8221; &#8211; you should get Services Acquisition Corp. International.  Instead, you get Strategic Vista International, which trades as SVI on the Toronto exchange. Putting in the company name doesn&#8217;t yield the company either. </p>
<p>Now, put in &#8220;PPS.&#8221;  Google Finance is currently showing it&#8217;s price at $1.57, even though it closed over $45.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if someone made a poor decision based on their incredibly faulty data (wrong company?  price off by a multiple of almost 30?!?) and tried to hold them legally responsible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
