<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Counsel: Misquoted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/03/17/google-counsel-misquoted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/17/google-counsel-misquoted/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/17/google-counsel-misquoted/#comment-116065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/17/google-counsel-misquoted/#comment-116065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;thanks victor. clearly, when you are wrong you are just wrong. and that includes linking to someone who is wrong. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;i have always tried to use the same rules of engagement on the blog as i do in my journalist life. of course to not do that would mean disrespecting the readers who spend time here.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks victor. clearly, when you are wrong you are just wrong. and that includes linking to someone who is wrong. </p>
<p>i have always tried to use the same rules of engagement on the blog as i do in my journalist life. of course to not do that would mean disrespecting the readers who spend time here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Blake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/17/google-counsel-misquoted/#comment-116064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Victor Blake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/17/google-counsel-misquoted/#comment-116064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I should have been more clear. I meant to say it&#039;s rare to see corrections in the media and to thank you as we weren&#039;t likely to see a correction made elsewhere.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have been more clear. I meant to say it&#8217;s rare to see corrections in the media and to thank you as we weren&#8217;t likely to see a correction made elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Blake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/17/google-counsel-misquoted/#comment-116063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Victor Blake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/17/google-counsel-misquoted/#comment-116063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Agreed. Thanks for pointing out the facts Om. It&#039;s rare. I doubt LR would do so.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Thanks for pointing out the facts Om. It&#8217;s rare. I doubt LR would do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emery Jeffreys</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/17/google-counsel-misquoted/#comment-116062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emery Jeffreys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 17:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/17/google-counsel-misquoted/#comment-116062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I always use tape in an interview. I learned that tool back when UPI was a real news service. My bet is that the quote is reasonably accurate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The best news quote I ever read was in the Wall Street Journal aand began like this &#8230; &quot;I wouldn&#039;t want to be quoted on this in the Wall Street Journal&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nobel laureate Nadine Gordimer points out that the truth is always less than the facts.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always use tape in an interview. I learned that tool back when UPI was a real news service. My bet is that the quote is reasonably accurate.</p>
<p>The best news quote I ever read was in the Wall Street Journal aand began like this &#8230; &#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t want to be quoted on this in the Wall Street Journal&#8230;</p>
<p>Nobel laureate Nadine Gordimer points out that the truth is always less than the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Noble</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/17/google-counsel-misquoted/#comment-116061</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Noble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/17/google-counsel-misquoted/#comment-116061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think the rest of his quote is worth mentioning&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Someone who saw the panel compared this bit of journalism to the story about the guy who is getting beat up by the goon squad for being a Communist. He says, “But I’m not a Communist, I’m an Anti-Communist.” The head goon says, “I don’t care what kind of Communist you are,” as they continue the beating.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is also worth mentioning that on lightreading the paragraph following the quote mentions that he was attributing the ideas to others.  However, the way those paragraphs are written in lightreading is certainly sensationalizing the episode and leads the reader to misinterpretation (particularly the title).

That said, kudos to Om for posting your mistake in such a transparent way.  It is nice to see all the history of the mistake posted right in the blog entry so that checking it out is only a click away.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the rest of his quote is worth mentioning</p>
<blockquote><p>
Someone who saw the panel compared this bit of journalism to the story about the guy who is getting beat up by the goon squad for being a Communist. He says, “But I’m not a Communist, I’m an Anti-Communist.” The head goon says, “I don’t care what kind of Communist you are,” as they continue the beating.
</p></blockquote>
<p>It is also worth mentioning that on lightreading the paragraph following the quote mentions that he was attributing the ideas to others.  However, the way those paragraphs are written in lightreading is certainly sensationalizing the episode and leads the reader to misinterpretation (particularly the title).</p>
<p>That said, kudos to Om for posting your mistake in such a transparent way.  It is nice to see all the history of the mistake posted right in the blog entry so that checking it out is only a click away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beef Jezos</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/17/google-counsel-misquoted/#comment-116060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beef Jezos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/17/google-counsel-misquoted/#comment-116060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Sucks? What kind of an inarticulate poo-poo head talks like that?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sucks? What kind of an inarticulate poo-poo head talks like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

