<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The FTTH Update &amp; IPTV Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/03/16/the-ftth-update-iptv-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/16/the-ftth-update-iptv-numbers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:07:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pencil Guy &#187; Archive &#187; By request: an assessment of Labor&#8217;s broadband policy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/16/the-ftth-update-iptv-numbers/#comment-115995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Pencil Guy &#187; Archive &#187; By request: an assessment of Labor&#8217;s broadband policy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/16/the-ftth-update-iptv-numbers/#comment-115995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] most online services require only &#8220;standard&#8221; broadband because that&#8217;s what the majority of US consumers have, and therefore that&#8217;s what Silicon Valley companies develop for. I&#8217;m not sure [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] most online services require only &#8220;standard&#8221; broadband because that&#8217;s what the majority of US consumers have, and therefore that&#8217;s what Silicon Valley companies develop for. I&#8217;m not sure [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ephraim Cohen</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/16/the-ftth-update-iptv-numbers/#comment-115994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ephraim Cohen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/16/the-ftth-update-iptv-numbers/#comment-115994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s great to see healthy growth in IPTV but are there more examples of how IPTV expands how it can be used as a delivery system?  For example, last week RBC Capital Markets released a report (http://www.rbc.com/newsroom/20060810tv.html) showing interest in IPTV due to the ability to watch content you want, when you want it.  When will we see some interesting offerings like customized TV channels be rolled out?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great to see healthy growth in IPTV but are there more examples of how IPTV expands how it can be used as a delivery system?  For example, last week RBC Capital Markets released a report (<a href="http://www.rbc.com/newsroom/20060810tv.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.rbc.com/newsroom/20060810tv.html</a>) showing interest in IPTV due to the ability to watch content you want, when you want it.  When will we see some interesting offerings like customized TV channels be rolled out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riad</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/16/the-ftth-update-iptv-numbers/#comment-115993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/16/the-ftth-update-iptv-numbers/#comment-115993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Your report is missing French operator Illiad, which has 1.1 million IPTV subscribers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Through unbundling it now provides 1.3 million customers with VoIP, 1.1 million with IPTV and 200,000 with video-on-demand&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.telegeography.com/cu/article.php?article_id=11693&amp;email=html&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your report is missing French operator Illiad, which has 1.1 million IPTV subscribers.</p>
<p>&#8220;Through unbundling it now provides 1.3 million customers with VoIP, 1.1 million with IPTV and 200,000 with video-on-demand&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegeography.com/cu/article.php?article_id=11693&#038;email=html" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegeography.com/cu/article.php?article_id=11693&#038;email=html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Siegel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/16/the-ftth-update-iptv-numbers/#comment-115992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Siegel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/16/the-ftth-update-iptv-numbers/#comment-115992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I have been salivating over the possibilities of IPTV for a while now, but ironically, I may never have access to it in my current home.  I live outside the Tucson, AZ city limits, and don&#039;t even have DSL or cable access, so what do you think my chances will be of ever getting fiber in my area?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;WiMax would probably not help either, as I would practically require a whole 40Meg backhaul path just for myself.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Om is right about one thing.  This is going to take a lot longer than people think.  Consider this&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been salivating over the possibilities of IPTV for a while now, but ironically, I may never have access to it in my current home.  I live outside the Tucson, AZ city limits, and don&#8217;t even have DSL or cable access, so what do you think my chances will be of ever getting fiber in my area?</p>
<p>WiMax would probably not help either, as I would practically require a whole 40Meg backhaul path just for myself.</p>
<p>Om is right about one thing.  This is going to take a lot longer than people think.  Consider this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/16/the-ftth-update-iptv-numbers/#comment-115991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/16/the-ftth-update-iptv-numbers/#comment-115991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Nice little IPTV article&#8230; I sure wish everyone would roll IPTV out to the masses faster.
Dan&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice little IPTV article&#8230; I sure wish everyone would roll IPTV out to the masses faster.<br />
Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
