<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Slaps FCC Silly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Sullivan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I just happened upon this. It&#039;s a bad memory. Just to set the record straight, the editors at Light Reading took Andrew&#039;s quote from its original context in my story and made it the headline. They knew they were conveying a message that was false, and they did it anyway. It was a naked attempt at getting clicks for the fledgling site. So there you go -- four years later, there&#039;s my side of the story.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just happened upon this. It&#8217;s a bad memory. Just to set the record straight, the editors at Light Reading took Andrew&#8217;s quote from its original context in my story and made it the headline. They knew they were conveying a message that was false, and they did it anyway. It was a naked attempt at getting clicks for the fledgling site. So there you go &#8212; four years later, there&#8217;s my side of the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon davenport</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon davenport]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hello there andrew and everyone else who said the fcc sucks because they do suck and kevin martin is a coward i wrote him 3 times and he well not get back to me to defend his fines against CBS. anyway i truly do think the fcc are a bunch of bullys and also they well not fine actors and actress because they know hollywood would put them out of order from me Brandon davenport&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there andrew and everyone else who said the fcc sucks because they do suck and kevin martin is a coward i wrote him 3 times and he well not get back to me to defend his fines against CBS. anyway i truly do think the fcc are a bunch of bullys and also they well not fine actors and actress because they know hollywood would put them out of order from me Brandon davenport</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;That the FCC sucks is the key reason we need Net Neutrality. If it remains a judgement call issue like it is now, the FCC will get it wrong.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That the FCC sucks is the key reason we need Net Neutrality. If it remains a judgement call issue like it is now, the FCC will get it wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew McLaughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi, this is Andrew McLaughlin.  I know you&#039;re going to find this shocking -- journalists always report things accurately, after all -- but I didn&#039;t say that the FCC sucks.  Rather, the opposite.  What I did at the VON panel was list the 5 top arguments of libertarian opponents of Net Neutrality.  Number 5 on that list:  The FCC sucks, and can&#039;t be trusted to regulate in a lighthanded way.  Note:  Not my argument.  Rather, that&#039;s the other side&#039;s argument, and the one that has to be addressed by proponents of Net Neutrality (like me!).  I even later joked about the inevitability of being misquoted.  And yes, sure enough.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Someone who saw the panel compared this bit of journalism to the story about the guy who is getting beat up by the goon squad for being a Communist.  He says, &quot;But I&#039;m not a Communist, I&#039;m an Anti-Communist.&quot;  The head goon says, &quot;I don&#039;t care what kind of Communist you are,&quot; as they continue the beating.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;--andrew&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this is Andrew McLaughlin.  I know you&#8217;re going to find this shocking &#8212; journalists always report things accurately, after all &#8212; but I didn&#8217;t say that the FCC sucks.  Rather, the opposite.  What I did at the VON panel was list the 5 top arguments of libertarian opponents of Net Neutrality.  Number 5 on that list:  The FCC sucks, and can&#8217;t be trusted to regulate in a lighthanded way.  Note:  Not my argument.  Rather, that&#8217;s the other side&#8217;s argument, and the one that has to be addressed by proponents of Net Neutrality (like me!).  I even later joked about the inevitability of being misquoted.  And yes, sure enough.</p>
<p>Someone who saw the panel compared this bit of journalism to the story about the guy who is getting beat up by the goon squad for being a Communist.  He says, &#8220;But I&#8217;m not a Communist, I&#8217;m an Anti-Communist.&#8221;  The head goon says, &#8220;I don&#8217;t care what kind of Communist you are,&#8221; as they continue the beating.</p>
<p>&#8211;andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Sierra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Sierra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;SBC knows full well that the FCC sucks, that&#039;s why they spend so much money to own the FCC.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google&#039;s problem is that while they can identify the problem, what they really want for themselves is to be in SBC&#039;s position.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google: We&#039;re the same ole devil, but with a new name.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SBC knows full well that the FCC sucks, that&#8217;s why they spend so much money to own the FCC.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s problem is that while they can identify the problem, what they really want for themselves is to be in SBC&#8217;s position.</p>
<p>Google: We&#8217;re the same ole devil, but with a new name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr WaveTheory</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr WaveTheory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 21:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Looks like Google just filed their 10-K. Mr WaveTheory posted his analysis of the trends cited in the 10k in this posting &#8230; &lt;a href=&quot;http://mrwavetheory.blogspot.com/2006/03/googles-10-k-is-out-today.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google filed their 10-K&lt;/a&gt;. Very insightful.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Google just filed their 10-K. Mr WaveTheory posted his analysis of the trends cited in the 10k in this posting &#8230; <a href="http://mrwavetheory.blogspot.com/2006/03/googles-10-k-is-out-today.html" rel="nofollow">Google filed their 10-K</a>. Very insightful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Perhaps SBC honestly tells the FCC it sucks considering all mega-telcos bankroll those who appoint the FCC in the first place. Remember that nine-letter word corruption?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps SBC honestly tells the FCC it sucks considering all mega-telcos bankroll those who appoint the FCC in the first place. Remember that nine-letter word corruption?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/google-slaps-fcc-silly/#comment-115962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Considering Google put out sensitive financial information for the whole world to see, this is not too bad. :D&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering Google put out sensitive financial information for the whole world to see, this is not too bad. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

