<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ericsson Buying Juniper?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alok</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45970</link>
		<dc:creator>Alok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45970</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It would start the big consolidation crunch, exactly the reverse of the 1999 bubble burst.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would start the big consolidation crunch, exactly the reverse of the 1999 bubble burst.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Blake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45969</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45969</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;An excellent match. They both have blue boxes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent match. They both have blue boxes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45968</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45968</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Given the trend in the Telecom industry (convergence of wired/wireless/IP) I&#039;d say it is a smart move by Ericsson to buy a company like Juniper. Ericsson has been reluctant to go into the &quot;computer&quot; side of the communications business before, but that is not the case anymore. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t really say anything about the rumor itself other than it makes sense. I have not heard anything about this except from what&#039;s in the media (I work for Ericsson by the way, but nowhere near where such discussions are going on, so&#8230;and even if I HAD heard anything, I wouldn&#039;t be able to comment anyway ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the trend in the Telecom industry (convergence of wired/wireless/IP) I&#8217;d say it is a smart move by Ericsson to buy a company like Juniper. Ericsson has been reluctant to go into the &#8220;computer&#8221; side of the communications business before, but that is not the case anymore. </p>

<p>I can&#8217;t really say anything about the rumor itself other than it makes sense. I have not heard anything about this except from what&#8217;s in the media (I work for Ericsson by the way, but nowhere near where such discussions are going on, so&#8230;and even if I HAD heard anything, I wouldn&#8217;t be able to comment anyway ;-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moo</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45967</link>
		<dc:creator>moo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45967</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Given all the consolidation in the telecom service provider segment, this was bound to happen and seems like a smart strategy to take on Cisco and low cost Chinese competitors.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given all the consolidation in the telecom service provider segment, this was bound to happen and seems like a smart strategy to take on Cisco and low cost Chinese competitors.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penguin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45966</link>
		<dc:creator>Penguin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 04:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45966</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;no chance&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no chance&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jardine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45964</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jardine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 02:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45964</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d say that Ericsson are in the IP fishing, but Juniper is a big fish to land. Still, if you&#039;re going to buy, buy big. My first instinct was that it seemed like a good move for Ericsson, but you&#039;re right about the dilutive effect, though there have been many deals that are more dilutive than this would be.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that Ericsson are in the IP fishing, but Juniper is a big fish to land. Still, if you&#8217;re going to buy, buy big. My first instinct was that it seemed like a good move for Ericsson, but you&#8217;re right about the dilutive effect, though there have been many deals that are more dilutive than this would be.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jardine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45965</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jardine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 02:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45965</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d say that Ericsson are in the IP fishing, but Juniper is a big fish to land. Still, if you&#039;re going to buy, buy big. My first instinct was that it seemed like a good move for Ericsson, but you&#039;re right about the dilutive effect, though there have been many deals that are more dilutive than this would be.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that Ericsson are in the IP fishing, but Juniper is a big fish to land. Still, if you&#8217;re going to buy, buy big. My first instinct was that it seemed like a good move for Ericsson, but you&#8217;re right about the dilutive effect, though there have been many deals that are more dilutive than this would be.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45963</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 21:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45963</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Leaves Nortel as a smaller player.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leaves Nortel as a smaller player.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45962</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 21:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45962</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;On the surface, it looks like a very good move.  Cisco has an end-to-end solution now that makes them very strong.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An Ericsson and Juniper merger would do much the same.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Excellent move iMO.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the surface, it looks like a very good move.  Cisco has an end-to-end solution now that makes them very strong.</p>

<p>An Ericsson and Juniper merger would do much the same.</p>

<p>Excellent move iMO.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45961</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 21:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/15/ericsson-buying-juniper/#comment-45961</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i&#039;d be very surprised given ericsson is just starting to thrive again after some very tough years. if it did materialize, it may just set off the long-awaited consolidation among the large telecom equipment makers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;d be very surprised given ericsson is just starting to thrive again after some very tough years. if it did materialize, it may just set off the long-awaited consolidation among the large telecom equipment makers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
