Comments on: SkypeMe Your eBay Bids

By: Bryan Bartow

Bryan Bartow — Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:06:37 +0000

If eBay charges a nickel or dime to add that “Skype Me” button to the listing (like they do with a lot of their add-ons) they will start to make that money back, albeit slowly. What I think is really driving the Skype purchase is the fact that the next step for eBay is services. I believe eBay is going to have to start selling people, and their knowledge, as a service. For example, my grandmother needs help with a computer issue. She goes on eBay and does a search for Services->Computers->Technical Support. She sees a listing of all the people who provide that service. She can see who has the highest feedback rating and, through presence, see who’s actually online at that very moment. She calls the person through Skype and hopefully gets the help she needs. I’m also fairly certain I’ve seen a VNC/RDC like plug-in for Skype, so maybe that person takes control of her desktop through Skype and fixes the problem while she watches. She gets charged by the minute and the expert and eBay split the money however eBay decides to split it. It’s just my opinion, but I think that’s where eBay is headed.

By: Scott Rafer

Scott Rafer — Sat, 11 Mar 2006 20:08:28 +0000

There were Skype Me buttons on Chinese eBay pages at the time of the acquisition. It was part of Whitman’s slideshow at the time.

By: skibare

skibare — Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:20:42 +0000

Skype is Hype till something is brought together like a Buyer/Seller…think outside the box to 2008 or 2009 when most folks just associate buying something with clicking EBAY and then click to call about something will be the norm…I think EBAY has a few more ”’tricks” up its sleeve myself=====now, 4.1 Billion is WAY WAY WAY too much but is it down the road????????

skibare

By: Things That ... Make You Go Hmm

Things That ... Make You Go Hmm — Sat, 11 Mar 2006 14:22:14 +0000

eBay and others buy 10% stake in decaying Meetup

I thought after last year’s Meetup subscription debacle, that they were destined to fail and it did impact their number of active groups to the tune of losing about 80%. So why am I talking about them? Because eBay has jumped in with other and bo…

By: Matt

Matt — Sat, 11 Mar 2006 13:07:11 +0000

I always thought the Skype buyout by Ebay was a somewhat strange fit. But I guess they had ideas on how they were going to combine the strengths of the two technologies.

By: internet phone service

internet phone service — Sat, 11 Mar 2006 10:10:59 +0000

Hello:

I am not surprized to read that ebay paid $4.1 billion for Skype.

Most big internet dot.com companies grew very fast with billions of dollars which venture capitalists poured into them.

Now they don't know what to do with all those billions of dollars but to spend it to buy a membership website for $4.1 billion dollars. (which can be created for a mere $1 million dollars easily)

Skype has a great internet phone communication service, but is it worth $4.1 billion dollars? This is the issue. Ebay, goodluck.

Ikey http://maychic.com/clickbankbuddy/index.cgi

By: flambeee

flambeee — Sat, 11 Mar 2006 02:28:19 +0000

skype is worth tripe

By: Robert Spivack

Robert Spivack — Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:09:53 +0000

Ah, but Skype on eBay is double-edge sword.

It facilitates "out of network" deals. Just close the deal on the phone and cancel the auction or sell additional items outside of eBay.

Currently, there is an email "trace" that can be used to report you if one solicits sales outside of the listed items but with voice, there is no record and if they start recording, there will be big objections about privacy, etc.

By: Hugo

Hugo — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:28:40 +0000

“Now if you are like me, then you are asking: this is it for $4.1 billion? There’s got to be more, right.”

My understanding is that eBay was also very interested in the serverless model upon which Skype's network is built, which makes it much easier to scale.

Don't know if it helps making $4.1 billion look more reasonable…

By: David Terrar

David Terrar — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:14:01 +0000

Although I still think your question is valid, have you read Geoffrey Moore’s comments on the way to view the value of the transaction which gave me a different perspective. It’s here: (link) weblog/2006/03/paperor_plasti.html

By: Ro

Ro — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:03:53 +0000

Om- here’s a hypothetical. What if, as Skype pushes into the small business space worldwide, eBay were to package an eCommerce/Payment solve along with a free communication solution? What if Skype’s global community of users could be presented buying opportunities from eBay, paid via Paypal through their P2P network? What if Skype/Paypal’s massive push off-eBay were a great point of access for eBay’s multi-channel solution (eBay/Stores/ProStores/Shopping)? That’s the nice thing about having huge communities across all three solutions. So long as there’s a common target (consumer/SMB), the potential for an integrated solve represents a lot of growth for all three entities.

By: Sporadicos

Sporadicos — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:36:10 +0000

You say: “I find it interesting that most of the tests are in countries that are not hostile to Skype. I think such a roll-out in the US would have the MSOs and the phone company(s) up in arms.”

What’s the point of market testing in the actual market (which is USA)? That is the whole point, they test it in smaller markets before launch.

By: John Hanger

John Hanger — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:50:53 +0000

Here’s the link to the Borrell White Paper…

(link)

By: Guttorm

Guttorm — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:36:35 +0000

Interesting article as usual Om. Just a small correction: The tests you mention in Norway, were actually conducted in the Netherlands. The author mixed up the TLDs .nl and .no and he obviously doesn’t speak either Norwegian nor Dutch…

By: Om Malik

Om Malik — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:26:02 +0000

Overpaid? Understatement of the day Damian ;-)

By: Om Malik

Om Malik — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:25:42 +0000

John Hanger,

if you have a copy of that white paper, send it along. it be great to read that paper.