<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco Buys VideoSpy Gear Maker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/03/08/cisco-buys-videospy-gear-maker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/08/cisco-buys-videospy-gear-maker/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:04:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Honovich</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/08/cisco-buys-videospy-gear-maker/#comment-115615</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Honovich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/08/cisco-buys-videospy-gear-maker/#comment-115615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;March&#039;s architecture and key markets (banking, retail, transport) is fundamentally different from Sypixx&#039;s strengths.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cisco/Sypixx will be a strong competitor to Verint, Broadware and Pelco which all offer very similiar distrubted architectures for integrating legazy analog systems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The deal is questionable in at least one major element - surveillance networks are moving very rapidly to IP cameras.  Connecting legacy analog cameras to Sypixx encoders is neither cheaper nor significantly more effectively than simply replacing legacy analog cameras for IP cameras.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just because everything may be moving to IP networks, it is not immediately appearant to me that, by itself, this is a strong move.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>March&#8217;s architecture and key markets (banking, retail, transport) is fundamentally different from Sypixx&#8217;s strengths.  </p>
<p>Cisco/Sypixx will be a strong competitor to Verint, Broadware and Pelco which all offer very similiar distrubted architectures for integrating legazy analog systems.</p>
<p>The deal is questionable in at least one major element &#8211; surveillance networks are moving very rapidly to IP cameras.  Connecting legacy analog cameras to Sypixx encoders is neither cheaper nor significantly more effectively than simply replacing legacy analog cameras for IP cameras.</p>
<p>Just because everything may be moving to IP networks, it is not immediately appearant to me that, by itself, this is a strong move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/08/cisco-buys-videospy-gear-maker/#comment-115614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Evans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/08/cisco-buys-videospy-gear-maker/#comment-115614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;looks like this deal will put cisco in competition with march networks.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like this deal will put cisco in competition with march networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/03/08/cisco-buys-videospy-gear-maker/#comment-115613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Evans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/03/08/cisco-buys-videospy-gear-maker/#comment-115613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;looks like this acquisition puts cisco in competition with march networks.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like this acquisition puts cisco in competition with march networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

