<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coffee, Wine &amp; WiFi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/02/23/coffee-wine-wifi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/23/coffee-wine-wifi/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:27:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/23/coffee-wine-wifi/#comment-115231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/23/coffee-wine-wifi/#comment-115231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Mike, I think you&#039;re confused. In the mobile phone space, geographic coverage takes a huge backseat to covered population. The number of WiFi users/day in a typical cafe is probably comparable to the number of users for a typical light-suburban/rural cellular tower. I don&#039;t know if any US carrier has as many as 35,000 towers. So, WiFi coverage, at least for sedentary users, may be a lot more caparable to mobile phone coverage than you think.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, I think you&#8217;re confused. In the mobile phone space, geographic coverage takes a huge backseat to covered population. The number of WiFi users/day in a typical cafe is probably comparable to the number of users for a typical light-suburban/rural cellular tower. I don&#8217;t know if any US carrier has as many as 35,000 towers. So, WiFi coverage, at least for sedentary users, may be a lot more caparable to mobile phone coverage than you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorian Benkoil</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/23/coffee-wine-wifi/#comment-115230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dorian Benkoil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 21:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/23/coffee-wine-wifi/#comment-115230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would love to see any evidence of an effect on eateries&#039; revenue or profits. IE, does having a hotspot mean more/less money for the establishment? (I know Starbucks makes nearly all its money off me cuz of its hotspots, and some establishments have lost me for lunch because they didn&#039;t have it -- or wanted me to pay on top of the $20/month I already give T-Mobile.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see any evidence of an effect on eateries&#8217; revenue or profits. IE, does having a hotspot mean more/less money for the establishment? (I know Starbucks makes nearly all its money off me cuz of its hotspots, and some establishments have lost me for lunch because they didn&#8217;t have it &#8212; or wanted me to pay on top of the $20/month I already give T-Mobile.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McCamon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/23/coffee-wine-wifi/#comment-115229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike McCamon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/23/coffee-wine-wifi/#comment-115229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the things that&#039;s interesting about these sorts of numbers is it looks impressive.  Call it good, er great, PR.  And I will admit it&#039;s going better than I expected and yes I had been a very frequent user myself.  However, to get a true picture of the phenomenon I like to translate these sorts of metrics into the types of numbers people in the mobile phone space use - coverage.

Assuming a generous 200ft range one standard Wi-Fi AP can cover 125,663 square feet (2-D model - not 3-D which gets harder).  Given that there&#039;s ~28M sq feet in a square mile that gives us about 220 APs needed to cover a square mile with standard Wi-Fi - which of course is generous as I&#039;m assuming range is square and not circular/elliptical just to simplify things.

If every café had only one AP that means today&#039;s Wi-Fi&#039;s coverage in this market equates to just over 155 square miles of area - the size of Belzoni, Mississippi.  Wondering about NY?  With 328 &quot;towers&quot; it&#039;s coverage is 1.48 square miles or about 950 acres.

Sorry.  My own version of Freak-o-nomics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things that&#8217;s interesting about these sorts of numbers is it looks impressive.  Call it good, er great, PR.  And I will admit it&#8217;s going better than I expected and yes I had been a very frequent user myself.  However, to get a true picture of the phenomenon I like to translate these sorts of metrics into the types of numbers people in the mobile phone space use &#8211; coverage.</p>
<p>Assuming a generous 200ft range one standard Wi-Fi AP can cover 125,663 square feet (2-D model &#8211; not 3-D which gets harder).  Given that there&#8217;s ~28M sq feet in a square mile that gives us about 220 APs needed to cover a square mile with standard Wi-Fi &#8211; which of course is generous as I&#8217;m assuming range is square and not circular/elliptical just to simplify things.</p>
<p>If every café had only one AP that means today&#8217;s Wi-Fi&#8217;s coverage in this market equates to just over 155 square miles of area &#8211; the size of Belzoni, Mississippi.  Wondering about NY?  With 328 &#8220;towers&#8221; it&#8217;s coverage is 1.48 square miles or about 950 acres.</p>
<p>Sorry.  My own version of Freak-o-nomics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/23/coffee-wine-wifi/#comment-115228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/23/coffee-wine-wifi/#comment-115228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps this what comes from living in Boston, but I&#039;ve always thought BEER to be the perfect WiFi accompanyment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this what comes from living in Boston, but I&#8217;ve always thought BEER to be the perfect WiFi accompanyment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/23/coffee-wine-wifi/#comment-115227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall Kennedy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/23/coffee-wine-wifi/#comment-115227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WiFi is an easy way for small businesses such as cafes and restaurants to connect many point-of-sale locations with less wiring. Even if your visitors never use or are unable to use the connection (WEP, WPA) businesses benefit by connecting their internal systems together over a wireless network.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WiFi is an easy way for small businesses such as cafes and restaurants to connect many point-of-sale locations with less wiring. Even if your visitors never use or are unable to use the connection (WEP, WPA) businesses benefit by connecting their internal systems together over a wireless network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

