<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati lacks Authority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:25:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pinaldave</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pinaldave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 03:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Authority is just linking blog. I see no realistic important of it. Search Engine sends most traffic to websites and blogs. The site linking are sending very little traffic in most cases. Search Engine vs. linking Blog (Technorati Authority) - Search Engine wins. - My humble opinion.&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p&gt;On lighter side answering Om&#039;s Question&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Om Mailk: What else you got Dave?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pinal Dave : My blog already has Authority in it - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sqlauthority.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SQLAuthority&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Authority is just linking blog. I see no realistic important of it. Search Engine sends most traffic to websites and blogs. The site linking are sending very little traffic in most cases. Search Engine vs. linking Blog (Technorati Authority) &#8211; Search Engine wins. &#8211; My humble opinion.</p>
<p>On lighter side answering Om&#8217;s Question</p>
<p>Om Mailk: What else you got Dave?</p>
<p>Pinal Dave : My blog already has Authority in it &#8211; <a href="http://www.sqlauthority.com" rel="nofollow">SQLAuthority</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; The New Blogger Disclaimer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; The New Blogger Disclaimer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...]  [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Pepper</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Pepper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Why should I have to tag at all? Is that all I should be doing on my blog, or should I care more about content and actually saying something for the greater conversation?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The &quot;authority&quot; button should be replaced with &quot;popularity and linkers&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should I have to tag at all? Is that all I should be doing on my blog, or should I care more about content and actually saying something for the greater conversation?</p>
<p>The &#8220;authority&#8221; button should be replaced with &#8220;popularity and linkers&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RimPack Slime &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RimPack Slime &#187; Blog Archive &#187;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] Technorati lacks Authority (Om Malik) [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Technorati lacks Authority (Om Malik) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oyvind</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oyvind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I agree with Chris. There should be a way that makes sites like Om Malik rate higher without having to tag every post with the general subject. Should for example Tuaw.com have to tag every post &quot;mac&quot; to rate high on Mac? Doesn&#039;t make sense. On the other hand, I don&#039;t have any other suggestions on how this should be done...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Chris. There should be a way that makes sites like Om Malik rate higher without having to tag every post with the general subject. Should for example Tuaw.com have to tag every post &#8220;mac&#8221; to rate high on Mac? Doesn&#8217;t make sense. On the other hand, I don&#8217;t have any other suggestions on how this should be done&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Aman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Aman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Seriously, it&#039;s still a keyword search.  Unless Technorati starts doing some fancy contextual stuff, maybe like latent semantic analysis or some such thing, unless you specifically mention &quot;technology&quot; in your post, you&#039;re not going to rank highly.  It&#039;s hardly any different than, say, Google and others in this regard.  As others pointed out, you rank quite highly for &quot;broadband&quot; and other keywords you&#039;re more likely to have mentioned directly in a blog post.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, it&#8217;s still a keyword search.  Unless Technorati starts doing some fancy contextual stuff, maybe like latent semantic analysis or some such thing, unless you specifically mention &#8220;technology&#8221; in your post, you&#8217;re not going to rank highly.  It&#8217;s hardly any different than, say, Google and others in this regard.  As others pointed out, you rank quite highly for &#8220;broadband&#8221; and other keywords you&#8217;re more likely to have mentioned directly in a blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heuer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Heuer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I agree - doesn&#039;t work and is an idea that is counter to the stated purpose.  On to the next thing...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; doesn&#8217;t work and is an idea that is counter to the stated purpose.  On to the next thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaibhav - iNods</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vaibhav - iNods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Same results, Om. I am surprised with the results when none of the top listed links for several search terms were totally unknown. Not sure what algorithm is powering this features, but definitely needs more work :)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same results, Om. I am surprised with the results when none of the top listed links for several search terms were totally unknown. Not sure what algorithm is powering this features, but definitely needs more work :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Parekh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Parekh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;The word &quot;Skype&quot; works as well, along with &quot;Broadband&quot; above in popping up those &quot;Om&quot; links.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word &#8220;Skype&#8221; works as well, along with &#8220;Broadband&#8221; above in popping up those &#8220;Om&#8221; links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Parekh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Parekh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/14/technorati-lacks-authority/#comment-114552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Try the word &quot;Broadband&quot;, Om...
here&#039;s the link:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.technorati.com/search/broadband?authority=a7&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try the word &#8220;Broadband&#8221;, Om&#8230;<br />
here&#8217;s the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.technorati.com/search/broadband?authority=a7" rel="nofollow">http://www.technorati.com/search/broadband?authority=a7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
