<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For Google, China Is A Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:06:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM Google, Sina team up against Baidu &#171;</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/#comment-114043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GigaOM Google, Sina team up against Baidu &#171;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/#comment-114043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] like Google is finally getting somewhere in China. Google has been expanding its presence and investing in local tech start-ups, as part of [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like Google is finally getting somewhere in China. Google has been expanding its presence and investing in local tech start-ups, as part of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mull</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/#comment-114042</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mull]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 20:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/#comment-114042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;China is a superpower, you don&#039;t screw around with Superpowers.  What was the US response when China invaded Tibet?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We should hold companies to a higher standard?  The US govt. works with some countries that really are not all nice, yet it attains our goals.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hell, companies sold them missile technology, so leaving out some search responses is not really that big a deal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Put it this way, when Chinese citizens get involved with things their govt. doesn&#039;t like, they get put in jail.  Maybe Google is doing them a favor.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China is a superpower, you don&#8217;t screw around with Superpowers.  What was the US response when China invaded Tibet?</p>
<p>We should hold companies to a higher standard?  The US govt. works with some countries that really are not all nice, yet it attains our goals.</p>
<p>Hell, companies sold them missile technology, so leaving out some search responses is not really that big a deal.</p>
<p>Put it this way, when Chinese citizens get involved with things their govt. doesn&#8217;t like, they get put in jail.  Maybe Google is doing them a favor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/#comment-114041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/#comment-114041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Andrew, if that was a joke -- good one. Otherwise, yikes . . .&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, if that was a joke &#8212; good one. Otherwise, yikes . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/#comment-114040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Schmitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/#comment-114040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Google is a strategic national asset. Just think of the searchtaps we can pull out of China once Google secures big market share. Better to let them become dominant rather than someone else.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is a strategic national asset. Just think of the searchtaps we can pull out of China once Google secures big market share. Better to let them become dominant rather than someone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amit upadhyay</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/#comment-114039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amit upadhyay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/#comment-114039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://nerdierthanthou.nfshost.com/2006/01/googlecn-pr-blunder.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Is Google censorship in China really worse than a PR blunder? &lt;/a&gt;I do not get it, how is creating a new sourco of information without eliminating any existing one censorship?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nerdierthanthou.nfshost.com/2006/01/googlecn-pr-blunder.html" rel="nofollow">Is Google censorship in China really worse than a PR blunder? </a>I do not get it, how is creating a new sourco of information without eliminating any existing one censorship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/#comment-114038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/#comment-114038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;actually i did not miss his point. its ironic. and yes i agree, that it is do little evil. but it is also business. sometimes that happens. sure i could have quoted his last two paragraphs, but then i would have taken away the joy of you reading dave. just saying.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually i did not miss his point. its ironic. and yes i agree, that it is do little evil. but it is also business. sometimes that happens. sure i could have quoted his last two paragraphs, but then i would have taken away the joy of you reading dave. just saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/#comment-114037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 04:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/02/01/for-google-china-is-a-business/#comment-114037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;om, i think you missed dave&#039;s point (so did jason, by the way). read the second half of his post. the part you cite above is, uh, meant to be ironic i think. esp. when you put it in context of the entire post.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>om, i think you missed dave&#8217;s point (so did jason, by the way). read the second half of his post. the part you cite above is, uh, meant to be ironic i think. esp. when you put it in context of the entire post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

