<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Is Sellout.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:48:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Campbell</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/#comment-113934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Campbell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/#comment-113934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;from the Washington Post:
&quot;Google&#039;s answer to the China dilemma is better, and more subtle, than that of other Internet firms. It does not simply assert that engagement with China is always good. It recognizes the arms race between China&#039;s repressive state power and China&#039;s liberating economic growth, and it accepts the conclusion that follows: Some forms of engagement hasten liberal trends; others empower jailers.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;the point is Google didn&#039;t sell out; they made a tough compromise, but the best they could in a difficult situation.  the Great Firewall of China is already in place; and Google made sure it would not be asked to turn over dissidents as Yahoo! did; it made sure it would let users know when their results are censored.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google hasn&#039;t strayed from its ideals--it made a practical compromise which is very different than selling out.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from the Washington Post:<br />
&#8220;Google&#8217;s answer to the China dilemma is better, and more subtle, than that of other Internet firms. It does not simply assert that engagement with China is always good. It recognizes the arms race between China&#8217;s repressive state power and China&#8217;s liberating economic growth, and it accepts the conclusion that follows: Some forms of engagement hasten liberal trends; others empower jailers.&#8221;</p>
<p>the point is Google didn&#8217;t sell out; they made a tough compromise, but the best they could in a difficult situation.  the Great Firewall of China is already in place; and Google made sure it would not be asked to turn over dissidents as Yahoo! did; it made sure it would let users know when their results are censored.</p>
<p>Google hasn&#8217;t strayed from its ideals&#8211;it made a practical compromise which is very different than selling out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mull</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/#comment-113933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mull]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/#comment-113933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hmmm, working with China, resisting the US Govt and missing your earnings estimate.  Not been a good couple of weeks for Google.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, working with China, resisting the US Govt and missing your earnings estimate.  Not been a good couple of weeks for Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/#comment-113932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Kopelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/#comment-113932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Saying a human rights issue is beyond a company is a slippery slope. Companies that cooperated with the Axis during WWII have all long since admitted it was wrong and payed reparations. What will Google and others say when China&#039;s totalitarian government falls and people accuse them of having supported that government? Either you have principles or you don&#039;t. It&#039;s not like either Google or Microsoft would go broke if they didn&#039;t sell to China, it is about them wanting to make MORE money.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying a human rights issue is beyond a company is a slippery slope. Companies that cooperated with the Axis during WWII have all long since admitted it was wrong and payed reparations. What will Google and others say when China&#8217;s totalitarian government falls and people accuse them of having supported that government? Either you have principles or you don&#8217;t. It&#8217;s not like either Google or Microsoft would go broke if they didn&#8217;t sell to China, it is about them wanting to make MORE money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khabri</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/#comment-113931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[khabri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/#comment-113931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;FreeSpeech issue in China is beyond Microsoft or Google. But I should commend this bold measure by the Chinese authorities since they don&#039;t want any hurdles in their growing economy. Once they are a developed nation, they will liberalize the media.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FreeSpeech issue in China is beyond Microsoft or Google. But I should commend this bold measure by the Chinese authorities since they don&#8217;t want any hurdles in their growing economy. Once they are a developed nation, they will liberalize the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/#comment-113930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/#comment-113930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;not sure, but egg roll does sound like a good name to me!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure, but egg roll does sound like a good name to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Curry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/#comment-113929</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Curry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/#comment-113929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;funny thing is, I know the guy that owns eggroll.com, wonder how much traffic he&#039;s seeing today :)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny thing is, I know the guy that owns eggroll.com, wonder how much traffic he&#8217;s seeing today :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Netanel Jacobsson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/#comment-113928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Netanel Jacobsson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/31/google-is-selloutcom/#comment-113928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Well, that is why Maxthon is working with Baidu in China...&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that is why Maxthon is working with Baidu in China&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

