<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily Cache</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/01/23/the-daily-cache/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/23/the-daily-cache/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry&#8217;s &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Convergence or Divergence</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/23/the-daily-cache/#comment-43355</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry&#8217;s &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Convergence or Divergence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 05:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/23/the-daily-cache/#comment-43355</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Om Malik&#8217;s Daily Cache had a link to a post by Stuart Mudie &#8220;Convergence towards a single device - yes, probably, but perhaps not yet.&#8221; that set me off on a click trail. My thoughts run opposite Stuart&#8217;s though. I just don&#8217;t see a converged device as the &#8220;end state&#8221; of mobile digital devices, however after getting a good look at some of the newest PDA phones with EVDO, Bluetooth and 802.11 I&#8217;m beginnig to see that a converged device will be an important step to what I think will be the eventual evolution of personal digital. So while &#8220;In Theory&#8221; I think diverged devices (I&#8217;ll explain later) are where we need to go, I am now seeing that devices like the Treo and UTStarcom 6700 are a necessary step along the way to mobile digital bliss. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Om Malik&#8217;s Daily Cache had a link to a post by Stuart Mudie &#8220;Convergence towards a single device &#8211; yes, probably, but perhaps not yet.&#8221; that set me off on a click trail. My thoughts run opposite Stuart&#8217;s though. I just don&#8217;t see a converged device as the &#8220;end state&#8221; of mobile digital devices, however after getting a good look at some of the newest PDA phones with EVDO, Bluetooth and 802.11 I&#8217;m beginnig to see that a converged device will be an important step to what I think will be the eventual evolution of personal digital. So while &#8220;In Theory&#8221; I think diverged devices (I&#8217;ll explain later) are where we need to go, I am now seeing that devices like the Treo and UTStarcom 6700 are a necessary step along the way to mobile digital bliss. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/23/the-daily-cache/#comment-43350</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/23/the-daily-cache/#comment-43350</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;jesse think of it as our cumulative senior moment. i know these brands and even remember memorex ads and original cassette tapes. how about that... much better than sbc/t deal!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jesse think of it as our cumulative senior moment. i know these brands and even remember memorex ads and original cassette tapes. how about that&#8230; much better than sbc/t deal!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/23/the-daily-cache/#comment-43347</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/23/the-daily-cache/#comment-43347</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Imation may be a major player, but it is hardly &quot;well known&quot; -- by consumers at least. Meanwhile, everyone of a certain age remembers &quot;is it live, or is it Memorex?&quot; Funny, but to me this is a bigger deal than SBC buying AT&amp;T (which had been dying a slow death ever since the Bell breakup). Hopefully, Imation will change their name to Memorex.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imation may be a major player, but it is hardly &#8220;well known&#8221; &#8212; by consumers at least. Meanwhile, everyone of a certain age remembers &#8220;is it live, or is it Memorex?&#8221; Funny, but to me this is a bigger deal than SBC buying AT&amp;T (which had been dying a slow death ever since the Bell breakup). Hopefully, Imation will change their name to Memorex.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
