MacBook Pro. I hate the name. I mean, I really hate the name. Say it out loud and you’re almost guaranteed to mess it up. Despite its horrendous name, the MBP (as I will call it for the duration of this article), certainly has a lot […]

MacBook Pro. I hate the name. I mean, I really hate the name. Say it out loud and you’re almost guaranteed to mess it up. Despite its horrendous name, the MBP (as I will call it for the duration of this article), certainly has a lot going for it. Apple likes to awe the press with its internal tests that show that the MBP is 4x-5x faster than the current top end PowerBooks, but in reality, how many people can actually make an association between a benchmark score and how a machine handles in every day use. Yesterday afternoon, I set out to test just that.

Even 3 hours after its announcement, the MBP was still surrounded by a layer of press 4-5 people thick (its down to about 3 today). I patiently took my place in line, and began waiting. Now, no matter how patient you are, when the guy in front of you keeps playing around with the toy you want so desperately to fondle, all those laws against maiming and rioting start to seem a bit silly.

After about 20 minutes of standing around, it was my turn. Naturally, the first thing I did was shut the machine down. The first and best indication of how fast a computer starts up. We are all used to pressing the power-button on our respective Macs, seeing black, then grey, then blue, then the login screen/desktop. I think David Pouge of the New York Times described the boot process of the MBP best.

You know normally you see the Apple logo and the spinning circle on startup. On these things it’s more like; press the power-button, BLIP, and you’re up and running”

So the MBP passed the boot test, but I wasn’t done putting it through its paces. Jobs had noted the speed of Safari on the new machines, and he wasn’t kidding. I can say with 100% certainty that the Intel build of Safari is the fastest web browser that I have ever used, on any platform. Instead of bouncing in the dock and forcing you to wait, Safari opens a new window and loads a page almost instantly when you open it.

One program at a time is nice, but Macs are about multitasking. I went to the Applications folders, selected all, and double clicked. Now, I know this is far beyond anything that would show up in normal use, but just wait until you hear the results. After slowing down significantly for around 30 seconds, the MBP started working smoothly again. And I mean smoothly. If you have ever had 3 or 4 resource hungry applications running simultaneously, you will be all too familiar with OS X taking a few seconds to switch between applications. Not so with the MBP. Clicking around between applications produced instant results, new documents opened quickly, and pages “Scrolled like butta,” as Reverend Jobs would say.

I didn’t have a chance to play with the remote or iSight, but I think its safe to assume that they work, and not much beyond that. Gimmicky is certainly the word that best describes those two features.

I hasten to say that the MBP is the fastest Mac I have ever used, keeping in mind I have not yet had a chance to play with the Intel iMac.

However, the MBP doesn’t lack its down-points. The MBP looses two things near-and-dear to my heart, a PCMCIA slot, and FireWire 800.

First, lets chat about FireWire. Apple was the first major manufacturer to include Firewire standard on their machines. This was a good thing. Firewire is a terrific interface with advanced features and blazing speeds. However, not many people actually need 800 megabit/s speeds, especially at the premium they were running. Apple started killing Firewire with the nano, and soon it was gone from the iPod. However, I don’t see Firewire going away for good any time soon. FW400 will certainly be with us on consumer level machines for a good time to come, and 800 should reappear soon. My hypothesis is such: At this point, the Pro Applications are not able to run natively on the MacBooks. No Final Cut, no need for fast ports. I see Apple announcing 12 and 17 inch MBP’s along side native Pro Applications some time in March.

As for PCMCIA, Apple obviously knows something we don’t about the new ExpressCard. PCMCIA is obviously still the de-facto standard, and this says to me that there is a big influx of ExpressCards coming to the market.

A nifty new feature on the new machines is a re-designed power plug. Apple designers have finally conquered the ages-old problem of cord trippage. Everyone has a story about tripping over a power cord plugged in to their machine, with the result of the machine flying across the room. The new plug attempts to solve this problem by introducing a mechanism that you don’t plug in, per se, but clip on. The plug is magnetic, and when you get the adapter close to the machine, it clicks snugly into a small depression.

A few little notes about the new machine before I sign off:
– The MBP uses a battery with a similar form factor to the 17 inch PowerBook
– The Airport antennae have been moved from the sides of the display to the hinge below the display.
– The track-pad is now the same size as those found on the 17 inch PowerBook

Update: No, the Pro Applications (Final Cut, Soundtrack, Motion, etc) do NOT work on the MBP, and will not until Apple releases native versions of the applications sometime in March.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Good stuff Dan – interesting to hear the good news that, despite the name – Argh, the name! – the machine is a nice piece of work. I shall be most pleased to see a 12″ model – with a name along the lines of, say, PowerBook Core – emerge in due course.

    On another (pedantic) note:

    The MBP looses two things near-and-dear to my heart, a PCMCIA slot, and FireWire 800.

    It’s “loses“, not “looses“, unless the MBP set free the PCMCIA slot and FireWire 800 port. :P

    1. Macbook pro? How is that hard to say? =P

  2. Hi Dan,

    I have read your story and I can only conclude the MacBook is a MacBeauty. Start saving…


  3. David Appleyard Thursday, January 12, 2006

    Nice review :)

  4. Martin MC Brown Thursday, January 12, 2006

    IF you read one of rht erports (I can’t remember which) the reason that FW800 has been dropped in this recision is that they are currently using an all-Intel chipset (for speed of developerment, I expect).

    Intel FireWire does not support FW800 (Intel pushed USB for a long time), so only FW400 is available.

    I suspect on Apple’s Pro machines, where they will have more space and more time to develop a suitable mobo FW800 will make a return.

  5. I very much doubt FW800 will appear as a built in connector on any intel based mac. It has failed to gain traction, eSATA II is cheaper and faster.

  6. Carsten Rose Lundberg Thursday, January 12, 2006

    Very nice review taking the conditions into consideration. To cheer you somewhat up PCMCIA and ExpressCard are not different technologies as you can read on TUAW

  7. Enrique A Gomez Thursday, January 12, 2006

    You forgot to mention something I read elsewhere today but had not noticed myself is the lack of S-Video out, and therefore composite. I’ll most certainly miss it, countless times I’ve hooked up my TiPowerBook to the TV to watch photos or movies, maybe Apple will come up with an alternative.

    Nice review by the way.

  8. The question I have that no one seems to be able to (or in Apple’s case, want to) answer is “what kind of battery life can we expect out of the MacBook Pro?

    I know there’s a lot of speculation about the battery life and how Apple isn’t telling us because it’s not as good as the latest update of the Powerbook, but I’m not one to put much faith in speculation. I’d like hard facts.

    Are we going to get 5+ hours out of our Intel-based laptops, or do we file battery life of the MacBook Pro under the same list as “Missing Firewire 800″ and “Lack of a PCMCIA slot?”

  9. what we all really want to know is: was the Mac Startup sound present?

  10. I’m curious – did you happen to use a non-Universal app? I’m wondering how programs like Photoshop & Dreamweaver 8 will respond on the MBP

Comments have been disabled for this post