<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shiira, Its like Safari on Steroids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: patlaj</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/#comment-41325</link>
		<dc:creator>patlaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/#comment-41325</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm just happy to have the reload and stop loading functions on different buttons. Maybe it's just me and my ancient hardware, but I frequently found myself clicking "stop" in Safari and not having the click register until after the page had finished loading. By then, Safari thought I was saying, "reload" so it retrieves the page I didn't want to load again.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just happy to have the reload and stop loading functions on different buttons. Maybe it&#8217;s just me and my ancient hardware, but I frequently found myself clicking &#8220;stop&#8221; in Safari and not having the click register until after the page had finished loading. By then, Safari thought I was saying, &#8220;reload&#8221; so it retrieves the page I didn&#8217;t want to load again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiira Project, le Firefox de Safari at RouXx.net</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/#comment-41323</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiira Project, le Firefox de Safari at RouXx.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/#comment-41323</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] A noter qu&#8217;il y a également une version mini de Shiira, sous forme de widget pour Tiger. via : Om Malik [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A noter qu&#8217;il y a également une version mini de Shiira, sous forme de widget pour Tiger. via : Om Malik [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PXLated</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/#comment-41321</link>
		<dc:creator>PXLated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/#comment-41321</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And Shiira has terrible downloading options. It is blazingly fast though.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Shiira has terrible downloading options. It is blazingly fast though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliotte Rusty Harold</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/#comment-41318</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliotte Rusty Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 09:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/#comment-41318</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Shiira is like Safari on crack. It has major, crippling bugs (inability to handle XML files) that Safari doesn't have. And to me at least the user interface looks worse tha Safari's, not better. But that's just my own opinion. The XML handlng bugs, though, are inexcusable.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shiira is like Safari on crack. It has major, crippling bugs (inability to handle XML files) that Safari doesn&#8217;t have. And to me at least the user interface looks worse tha Safari&#8217;s, not better. But that&#8217;s just my own opinion. The XML handlng bugs, though, are inexcusable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/#comment-41315</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/#comment-41315</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;actually once you try it out, you will know what I am saying :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually once you try it out, you will know what I am saying :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/#comment-41313</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/#comment-41313</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;let me explain... camino is a better, faster and cleaner version of firefox. and shiira is a better faster cleaner version of safari browser.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let me explain&#8230; camino is a better, faster and cleaner version of firefox. and shiira is a better faster cleaner version of safari browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Nicolas</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/#comment-41304</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/08/shiira-vs-safari/#comment-41304</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not exactly sure I understand your analogy. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Camino is to Safari (IMO) what Firefox is to IE (to a much lesser degree of course). &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm so confused&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not exactly sure I understand your analogy. </p>
<p>Camino is to Safari (IMO) what Firefox is to IE (to a much lesser degree of course). </p>
<p>I&#8217;m so confused</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
