<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dot Mac Does Terabyte Transfer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:47:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Whitney &#187; Online Entertainment is the new Great Leveler</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-40040</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Whitney &#187; Online Entertainment is the new Great Leveler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-40040</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] When it rains it pours.&#160; Everyone knows that broadband is gonna be monitized by Hollywood.&#160; I was first hip&#8217;d to .Mac offering a terrabyte on the TechPodcasts mailing list, then I saw OmMalik confirm it with his post Dot Mac Does Terabyte Transfer .&#160; Now&#8230; today I see two big stories.&#160; Another one through Om: Entertainment, the killer app of broadband&#160; and one from Time online about NBC answering America Idol with an onlive competition.&#160; Man&#8230; Anyone can compete.&#160; The small act big, the big act small.&#160; The world is flat. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When it rains it pours.&nbsp; Everyone knows that broadband is gonna be monitized by Hollywood.&nbsp; I was first hip&#8217;d to .Mac offering a terrabyte on the TechPodcasts mailing list, then I saw OmMalik confirm it with his post Dot Mac Does Terabyte Transfer .&nbsp; Now&#8230; today I see two big stories.&nbsp; Another one through Om: Entertainment, the killer app of broadband&nbsp; and one from Time online about NBC answering America Idol with an onlive competition.&nbsp; Man&#8230; Anyone can compete.&nbsp; The small act big, the big act small.&nbsp; The world is flat. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39937</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 22:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39937</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This past week I put up some QT video in my account to distribute to friends. The files were 175 and 12 MB. Both caused my finder to freeze up due to slow transfer. (Had not experienced this problem in the past) I finally used Goliath to move the 175 MB file and that took over 30 minutes. And then my friends were complaining that their broadband connections had trouble downloading. Maybe someone at .mac is experimenting with allocating bandwidth. In fact on the disccussions board there is a lot of complaining about slow connection with iDisk. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I did not see the above &quot;announcement&quot; but I sure could have used some bandwidth.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This past week I put up some QT video in my account to distribute to friends. The files were 175 and 12 MB. Both caused my finder to freeze up due to slow transfer. (Had not experienced this problem in the past) I finally used Goliath to move the 175 MB file and that took over 30 minutes. And then my friends were complaining that their broadband connections had trouble downloading. Maybe someone at .mac is experimenting with allocating bandwidth. In fact on the disccussions board there is a lot of complaining about slow connection with iDisk. </p>

<p>Anyway, I did not see the above &#8220;announcement&#8221; but I sure could have used some bandwidth.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geir Werner</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39900</link>
		<dc:creator>Geir Werner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 19:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39900</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;IF this is true, and I think it is, this is obviously a sign of things to come. This fits perfect with the idea of &quot;media-centre-ish&quot; new service from Applem via iTunes. You will be able to buy movies, tv-shows etc.etc. but you will never download them to your computer. Using newly patended ( google it...) cache technology Apple will sell you media that you stream from a .mac account. Anyway, I cant wait for Steves keynote in a weeks time ( actually I can and will... but  you get the picture)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF this is true, and I think it is, this is obviously a sign of things to come. This fits perfect with the idea of &#8220;media-centre-ish&#8221; new service from Applem via iTunes. You will be able to buy movies, tv-shows etc.etc. but you will never download them to your computer. Using newly patended ( google it&#8230;) cache technology Apple will sell you media that you stream from a .mac account. Anyway, I cant wait for Steves keynote in a weeks time ( actually I can and will&#8230; but  you get the picture)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Walker</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39862</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 17:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39862</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It seems to me like there was a rumor somewhere about .MAC integrating into a new media service.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ahh yes: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0511contentdist.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2005/12/20051202133834.shtml&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me like there was a rumor somewhere about .MAC integrating into a new media service.  </p>

<p>Ahh yes: <a href="http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0511contentdist.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2005/12/20051202133834.shtml">here</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: renrav</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39829</link>
		<dc:creator>renrav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39829</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Definitely not photoshop. I went to my account after seeing this on another site the other night. Looked at it yesterday when others started to report that it had been removed and sure enough, mine was gone to. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe signs of something to come soon?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely not photoshop. I went to my account after seeing this on another site the other night. Looked at it yesterday when others started to report that it had been removed and sure enough, mine was gone to. </p>

<p>Maybe signs of something to come soon?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39803</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 15:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39803</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t you HATE it when self-professed Photoshop experts want to be the first to call anything fake just to show their &quot;discerning eye&quot;? :) The only saving grace is that it&#039;s so darn funny when they&#039;re flat wrong LOL!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you HATE it when self-professed Photoshop experts want to be the first to call anything fake just to show their &#8220;discerning eye&#8221;? :) The only saving grace is that it&#8217;s so darn funny when they&#8217;re flat wrong LOL!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boof</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39788</link>
		<dc:creator>boof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 15:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39788</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;mine had it, now it&#039;s gone. 1 TB of bandwidth is insane, and was obviously a mistake that got pulled.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mine had it, now it&#8217;s gone. 1 TB of bandwidth is insane, and was obviously a mistake that got pulled.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39737</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 07:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39737</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;well, i have had different responses on this, and with the permission of the author, blogged the screen shot. i think it might have been a glitch or actually something that&#039;s going to come to light soon enough.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, i have had different responses on this, and with the permission of the author, blogged the screen shot. i think it might have been a glitch or actually something that&#8217;s going to come to light soon enough.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39674</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 04:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39674</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That is a real screenshot. I saw the same exact thing yesterday when I logged into my account. They seem to have updated it now though, it&#039;s not displaying any bandwidth information at all for me... Either it was some kind of typo, or they are trying to keep something secret (big Macworld announcement?).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a real screenshot. I saw the same exact thing yesterday when I logged into my account. They seem to have updated it now though, it&#8217;s not displaying any bandwidth information at all for me&#8230; Either it was some kind of typo, or they are trying to keep something secret (big Macworld announcement?).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Fleishman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39626</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Fleishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 04:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2006/01/01/dot-mac-does-terabyte-transfer/#comment-39626</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The screen capture doesn&#039;t match the typography or appearance of my Account display. The type in the screen capture is rendered differently -- more like Photoshop -- than Safari or Firefox.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The screen capture doesn&#8217;t match the typography or appearance of my Account display. The type in the screen capture is rendered differently &#8212; more like Photoshop &#8212; than Safari or Firefox.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
