<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2005 - Year of the Broadband</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/</link>
	<description>The Business of Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39467</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 07:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39467</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That kind good information with graph and figures. Thanks for posting it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That kind good information with graph and figures. Thanks for posting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; Paris Mayor: Free Internet For All</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39466</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; Paris Mayor: Free Internet For All</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39466</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] According to some estimates, France has fallen behind UK in the broadband subscriber numbers. If you have interest in global broadband, please visit our Broadband Wiki and help us keep it up-to-date. [...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to some estimates, France has fallen behind UK in the broadband subscriber numbers. If you have interest in global broadband, please visit our Broadband Wiki and help us keep it up-to-date. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Kopelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39465</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Kopelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 23:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39465</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think you're wrong Om. Without services like Skype and P2P, why would anyone pay $40+/month for broadband? If all you are going to do is e-mail and surf, dial-up or the cheapest tier of DSL is good enough. The pipe owners owe just as much to Skype et al as oil companies owe to SUV producing car companies.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re wrong Om. Without services like Skype and P2P, why would anyone pay $40+/month for broadband? If all you are going to do is e-mail and surf, dial-up or the cheapest tier of DSL is good enough. The pipe owners owe just as much to Skype et al as oil companies owe to SUV producing car companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39464</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 17:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39464</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;charlie, as you rightfully point out, there are "payments" when it comes to CNN/ESPN etc. not parasitic in any sense. pipe owners are making money. anyway that is the problem Skype has. it uses  the infrastructure but doesn't really share the spoils as of now.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>charlie, as you rightfully point out, there are &#8220;payments&#8221; when it comes to CNN/ESPN etc. not parasitic in any sense. pipe owners are making money. anyway that is the problem Skype has. it uses  the infrastructure but doesn&#8217;t really share the spoils as of now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Sierra</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39462</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Sierra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 15:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39462</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;"...unlike skype which is a parasitic service"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Om, shirley you don't mean to imply that Yahoo, Google, Bittorent, or heaven forbid all blogs are parasitic? (well maybe bittorent...)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do the Cablecos consider CNN, ESPN, MTV parasitic?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Who pays who in that arrangement, and what makes anybody think the internet distributor-content provider relationship will be upside down?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;unlike skype which is a parasitic service&#8221;</p>
<p>Om, shirley you don&#8217;t mean to imply that Yahoo, Google, Bittorent, or heaven forbid all blogs are parasitic? (well maybe bittorent&#8230;)</p>
<p>Do the Cablecos consider CNN, ESPN, MTV parasitic?</p>
<p>Who pays who in that arrangement, and what makes anybody think the internet distributor-content provider relationship will be upside down?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modesto Alexandre</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39460</link>
		<dc:creator>Modesto Alexandre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 10:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39460</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;2006 year of FTTH :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Happy New Year&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2006 year of FTTH :)</p>
<p>Happy New Year</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39458</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 08:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39458</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;and just as an aside, the people who are driving the cost of voice to zero: pipe owners with no legacy business. because they are the ones who can afford to do it. unlike skype which is a parasitic service that can be choked at the will of the carriers/users.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and just as an aside, the people who are driving the cost of voice to zero: pipe owners with no legacy business. because they are the ones who can afford to do it. unlike skype which is a parasitic service that can be choked at the will of the carriers/users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39457</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 08:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39457</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;the reason skype deal is head scratching is because of the money involved. i don't think the $4 billion price tag makes sense. anyway i have my opinions on this, and you have yours.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the reason skype deal is head scratching is because of the money involved. i don&#8217;t think the $4 billion price tag makes sense. anyway i have my opinions on this, and you have yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39456</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 06:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/31/2005-year-of-the-broadband/#comment-39456</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I find it amusing that you find the skype deal head scratching, then lay out almost every reason why it's not.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The fact is, voice WILL be free, and skype is the market leader. I guess the fact the ebay is the buyer is headscratching, but the metrics of the deal make so much sense... I think that in 6-12 months, people will be talking about the genius of this deal. Skype, in my opinion, was the #1 acquisition target of 2002-2005.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it amusing that you find the skype deal head scratching, then lay out almost every reason why it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>The fact is, voice WILL be free, and skype is the market leader. I guess the fact the ebay is the buyer is headscratching, but the metrics of the deal make so much sense&#8230; I think that in 6-12 months, people will be talking about the genius of this deal. Skype, in my opinion, was the #1 acquisition target of 2002-2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
