<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:17:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VentureFiles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Om Malik makes some Apple 2006 predictions</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39196</link>
		<dc:creator>VentureFiles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Om Malik makes some Apple 2006 predictions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 19:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39196</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] The full article is here. Michael Parekh has a nice article too on his blog. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The full article is here. Michael Parekh has a nice article too on his blog. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; Apple, Google Had Good 2005</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39194</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; Apple, Google Had Good 2005</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 21:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39194</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Apple, I am betting is going to have a good if not great 2006. The reason I say that is because the company did rather well in 2005. While most of the world focused on the booming sales of iPod, Apple&#8217;s core business of selling computers also had a record year. Market Share website shows some really revealing data on Apple&#8217;s improved fortunes in 2005. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple, I am betting is going to have a good if not great 2006. The reason I say that is because the company did rather well in 2005. While most of the world focused on the booming sales of iPod, Apple&#8217;s core business of selling computers also had a record year. Market Share website shows some really revealing data on Apple&#8217;s improved fortunes in 2005. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39192</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39192</guid>
		<description>&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Not with China building so many PC&#039;s&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;iPhone, uPhone we all have a phone.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Show me the Video card.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;I need a toaster that plays music...&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Cingular is changing its name.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Carrying 3000 songs why would I need to an expensive download of a new song?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol>
<li>Not with China building so many PC&#8217;s</li>
<li>iPhone, uPhone we all have a phone.</li>
<li>Show me the Video card.</li>
<li>I need a toaster that plays music&#8230;</li>
<li>Cingular is changing its name.</li>
</ol>

<p>Carrying 3000 songs why would I need to an expensive download of a new song?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39190</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39190</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Huge number of users switching to MAC OS? Dream on. Not that I have anything against the MAC OS, but the realistic change that has happened so far is a half-point percentage &quot;Switch&quot; over the past couple of years(give or take). So it would be very premature to claim 2006 as the year of the switch, seeing as the new version of Windows might be out as well in 2006. But maybe someone can throw some hard numbers to back up that claim later. Until then, Windows will dominate the PC market (for better or worse).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huge number of users switching to MAC OS? Dream on. Not that I have anything against the MAC OS, but the realistic change that has happened so far is a half-point percentage &#8220;Switch&#8221; over the past couple of years(give or take). So it would be very premature to claim 2006 as the year of the switch, seeing as the new version of Windows might be out as well in 2006. But maybe someone can throw some hard numbers to back up that claim later. Until then, Windows will dominate the PC market (for better or worse).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Eisenberg</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39188</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Eisenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39188</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OM -
I am so fed up with the junk that permeates my home computer and is shown to my kids that I am thinking of making the switch at home as well. By the way, I wrote a related post on Saturday looking at Apple in 2006 from a &quot;portal perspective.&quot;  Posted on my blog and on the internetstockblog  at http://internetstockblog.com/article/5303&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OM -
I am so fed up with the junk that permeates my home computer and is shown to my kids that I am thinking of making the switch at home as well. By the way, I wrote a related post on Saturday looking at Apple in 2006 from a &#8220;portal perspective.&#8221;  Posted on my blog and on the internetstockblog  at <a href="http://internetstockblog.com/article/5303" rel="nofollow">http://internetstockblog.com/article/5303</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39186</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39186</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Om, Paul K is in fact switching.  His blog mentions that he will try out a Mac this week.  Wow, that was quick.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Om, Paul K is in fact switching.  His blog mentions that he will try out a Mac this week.  Wow, that was quick.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LG</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39184</link>
		<dc:creator>LG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39184</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As far as Switching goes: I&#039;m a switcher, and whilst it wasn&#039;t &lt;em&gt;because&lt;/em&gt; of Ellen Feiss, she and Jamie made the idea acceptable to me. Until then, I never really considered a Mac.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So maybe those guys did their job after all&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as Switching goes: I&#8217;m a switcher, and whilst it wasn&#8217;t <em>because</em> of Ellen Feiss, she and Jamie made the idea acceptable to me. Until then, I never really considered a Mac.</p>

<p>So maybe those guys did their job after all</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravneet</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39182</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravneet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/#comment-39182</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Om,
It would be worth waiting for # 2 and #4 happening in 2006 ! This would (much to the wrath of opposers of my ideas) confirm a step towards LifeStyle 2.0 (http://www.emergintex.com/blog/?p=107)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Om,
It would be worth waiting for # 2 and #4 happening in 2006 ! This would (much to the wrath of opposers of my ideas) confirm a step towards LifeStyle 2.0 (<a href="http://www.emergintex.com/blog/?p=107" rel="nofollow">http://www.emergintex.com/blog/?p=107</a>)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
