Comments on: People Power Vs Google

By: gloria

gloria — Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:37:07 +0000

I think that google is no alternate for yahoo. About API problems, you can not disputate!

By: likeike

likeike — Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:35:28 +0000

Google is on top like it was view years ago and because of the great ideas and tools it will stay there till we grow old. move on G.

By: Tomm Webb

Tomm Webb — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:35:14 +0000

I think the internet has changed the world and democratized. Google was a great help. But Google is now so powerful and increasingly dominates the media freedom of expression is intended that the democratization is threatened. What do you think? What can we do against the slowly lost of freedom?

By: tinchen

tinchen — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 17:12:55 +0000

I think they could do what they like

By: erina

erina — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:36:16 +0000

Yeah now they are having bing but still the leader is google

By: BlogRovR: the conversation is everywhere » Blog Archive » Om Malik on Broadband : People Power Vs Google - actively weaving your web

Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:40:17 +0000

[...] January 7th, 2006 by Jean Sini about: google about: activeweave about: activeweave about: om malik on broadband : » people power vs google [...]

By: Erika

Erika — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:01:25 +0000

I thin the power of google will increase in a few years. The store books. if they have all books they can change the pastense. George Orwell is right at the end

By: toni

toni — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:00:40 +0000

i don think that any collective will ever be able to beat google. they’ve got the $$

By: Web 2.0: What Does It Mean For Your Business?

Web 2.0: What Does It Mean For Your Business? — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:07:42 +0000

[...] is Web 2.0? by Tim O’Reilly People Power vs. Google by Om [...]

By: Social Search Engines Wink, Reunion to Merge - GigaOM

Social Search Engines Wink, Reunion to Merge - GigaOM — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:32:30 +0000

[...] switch to a site geared specifically toward social searching. This was one of the reasons we were highly skeptical of the people-based search trend back in 2005, when Wink announced its [...]

By: Elisa

Elisa — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 08:09:56 +0000

“INHO Wink has 3 disadvantages:”

Add a fourth: Marc Andressen, the kiss of death to any venture. :-)

By: Dave

Dave — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 05:58:55 +0000

I think that’s not the question. The question is why the hell should you have the right to decide what’s good or bad for me. What if I decide that YOU would be better with a hole in your head?

By: Camchat

Camchat — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:06:32 +0000

[I believe Google is going to have a monopol. Was hoping that yahoo is going to be better if they get buyed by microsoft but doesn´t seem so......]
forget it, google is the monopol in the future.

By: AM IVE

AM IVE — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 05:30:39 +0000

E-Business Blog with very much intresante topics and categories.
AM-Iva

By: Doktor

Doktor — Thu, 15 May 2008 21:23:29 +0000

I think a searchengine with human power is much better than having only a machine for the same action. It is fact that machines are more quick and the result also newer and bigger than the selfmade ones, but we know that machines make mistakes. Is it more important to have big and new results or a better index checked by humans. I think this is the better way for searching and indexing the internet.

By: Petra

Petra — Sat, 03 May 2008 20:54:07 +0000

A regard-worth side, in which one gladly, also the information stayed were numerous, gives for it no comparison, the high point one reached. Finding of the side was not heavy, but leaving the more.