<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First 300,000 is easy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/</link>
	<description>Tracking the Internet Evolution</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; The Web 2.0 Hit By Outages</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37753</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; The Web 2.0 Hit By Outages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37753</guid>
		<description>[...] A few weeks ago, I had a healthy and civilized debate with the gents from 37Signals (followed subsequently with a podcast with questionable sound quality) on the issue of scale and scalability. I laid out my case, they responded with theirs and so we went. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few weeks ago, I had a healthy and civilized debate with the gents from 37Signals (followed subsequently with a podcast with questionable sound quality) on the issue of scale and scalability. I laid out my case, they responded with theirs and so we went. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwyn Chan's Weblog : web 2.0 &#124; blog media &#124; china</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37752</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwyn Chan's Weblog : web 2.0 &#124; blog media &#124; china</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37752</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The importance of 300 000&lt;/strong&gt;

300 000 seems to be the magic number with web 2.0 companies.  Del.icio.us had 300 000 users when it got acquired by yahoo last week and flickr only had 250 000 when they were acquired last year. This shows that if you want to be in the map you need at ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The importance of 300 000</strong></p>
<p>300 000 seems to be the magic number with web 2.0 companies.  Del.icio.us had 300 000 users when it got acquired by yahoo last week and flickr only had 250 000 when they were acquired last year. This shows that if you want to be in the map you need at &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tecnorantes</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37751</link>
		<dc:creator>Tecnorantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37751</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;La cifra magica, Yahoo, los tags, los clasificado y Google&lt;/strong&gt;

	Parece que la cifra mágica de usuarios que tiene que tener una aplicación web 2.0 para despertar el interés de los grandes, esta sobre los 250.000 usuarios.
Este es el numero de usuarios que tenia Flickr cuando los compro Yahoo.
Y algunos mas, unos...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>La cifra magica, Yahoo, los tags, los clasificado y Google</strong></p>
<p>	Parece que la cifra mágica de usuarios que tiene que tener una aplicación web 2.0 para despertar el interés de los grandes, esta sobre los 250.000 usuarios.<br />
Este es el numero de usuarios que tenia Flickr cuando los compro Yahoo.<br />
Y algunos mas, unos&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37750</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 05:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37750</guid>
		<description>Well I'm one of the 300,000 - just as I was one of the 250,000 on Flickr.

The difference: I gave Flickr money. And I use it all of the time.

I guess I don't get the del.icio.us thing at all. More dust.bin to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m one of the 300,000 - just as I was one of the 250,000 on Flickr.</p>
<p>The difference: I gave Flickr money. And I use it all of the time.</p>
<p>I guess I don&#8217;t get the del.icio.us thing at all. More dust.bin to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jardine</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37749</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jardine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 11:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37749</guid>
		<description>I agree that Web 2.0 is in early adopter stage. The applications are not really solving everyday problems, but rather organising things that 'internet-savvy' people do already. When Web 2.0 starts to spill over into CRM, that's where big changes should start to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Web 2.0 is in early adopter stage. The applications are not really solving everyday problems, but rather organising things that &#8216;internet-savvy&#8217; people do already. When Web 2.0 starts to spill over into CRM, that&#8217;s where big changes should start to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Shelton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37748</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Shelton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37748</guid>
		<description>This isn't about tags... Look deeper at what delicious does, especially in the context of things like Flock.  It is a part of storing your digital world and connecting you with your community...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t about tags&#8230; Look deeper at what delicious does, especially in the context of things like Flock.  It is a part of storing your digital world and connecting you with your community&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gopi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37747</link>
		<dc:creator>Gopi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37747</guid>
		<description>&#62;&#62; Yahoo paid for 300,000 humans who will categorize (tag) the web for them

The problem is the interests of those 300k or so people are so out of tune with the rest of the population ,so the tags will not be of much use to yahoo in search.

If you want proof just compare the popular del.icio.us tags with that of Google Zeitagalist or Yahoo Buzz index</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; Yahoo paid for 300,000 humans who will categorize (tag) the web for them</p>
<p>The problem is the interests of those 300k or so people are so out of tune with the rest of the population ,so the tags will not be of much use to yahoo in search.</p>
<p>If you want proof just compare the popular del.icio.us tags with that of Google Zeitagalist or Yahoo Buzz index</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37746</link>
		<dc:creator>W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37746</guid>
		<description>I think it's a mistake to value del.icio.us only in terms of the size of its user base.

Instead, think of it this way: Yahoo paid for 300,000 humans who will categorize (tag) the web for them.  There will be all sorts of opportunities to use that tagging in Yahoo's main search application and other Yahoo searches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a mistake to value del.icio.us only in terms of the size of its user base.</p>
<p>Instead, think of it this way: Yahoo paid for 300,000 humans who will categorize (tag) the web for them.  There will be all sorts of opportunities to use that tagging in Yahoo&#8217;s main search application and other Yahoo searches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37745</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37745</guid>
		<description>i think google's tagging efforts are more "machine based" than "human based" as yahoo is trying. divergent ways of doing things. and google hasn't basically made a big bet on tagging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think google&#8217;s tagging efforts are more &#8220;machine based&#8221; than &#8220;human based&#8221; as yahoo is trying. divergent ways of doing things. and google hasn&#8217;t basically made a big bet on tagging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawn</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37744</link>
		<dc:creator>shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/12/10/first-300000-is-easy/#comment-37744</guid>
		<description>Yahoo has been pushing tags more than Google and with acquiring del.icio.us they are re-inforcing their bet.  I would disagree that Google isn't vying for tag space.  One could look at Google Base as a mash up of tagging and classified advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo has been pushing tags more than Google and with acquiring del.icio.us they are re-inforcing their bet.  I would disagree that Google isn&#8217;t vying for tag space.  One could look at Google Base as a mash up of tagging and classified advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
