<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TiVo&#8217;s New Free Deal Will Save You $2 a year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/11/11/tivos-new-free-deal-will-save-you-2-a-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/11/tivos-new-free-deal-will-save-you-2-a-year/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:01:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kernel Mustard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Am I the only one who thinks TiVo is expensive?!</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/11/tivos-new-free-deal-will-save-you-2-a-year/#comment-33413</link>
		<dc:creator>Kernel Mustard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Am I the only one who thinks TiVo is expensive?!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/11/11/tivos-new-free-deal-will-save-you-2-a-year/#comment-33413</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Om Malik has a post up about another one of TiVo&#8217;s little marketing gimmicks. I swear, I almost got myself convinced to buy one, even though I watch exactly 1 hour of TV per week (which is, atm, occupied by Rome on HBO). But then I read the fine print: 13-17 bucks per month - no way, not even close. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Om Malik has a post up about another one of TiVo&#8217;s little marketing gimmicks. I swear, I almost got myself convinced to buy one, even though I watch exactly 1 hour of TV per week (which is, atm, occupied by Rome on HBO). But then I read the fine print: 13-17 bucks per month &#8211; no way, not even close. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/11/tivos-new-free-deal-will-save-you-2-a-year/#comment-33412</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/11/11/tivos-new-free-deal-will-save-you-2-a-year/#comment-33412</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know what the $16.95 monthly rate moves to for years 2 - x?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know what the $16.95 monthly rate moves to for years 2 &#8211; x?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnathan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/11/tivos-new-free-deal-will-save-you-2-a-year/#comment-33401</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 01:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/11/11/tivos-new-free-deal-will-save-you-2-a-year/#comment-33401</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well - to me it&#039;s simply another step of evolution from product to service.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here, TiVo is taking a product and making it into a service. IMO, for the US consumer, monthly payments seem much more acceptable, somehow, than paying large amounts one time. Also, with the ever-changing technology behind PVRs, it may not make sense to own them, eventually, for those who are non-technical and don&#039;t want to tinker. Much easier to just pay a slightly higher fee, and just let someone else make decisions about hardware.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8211; to me it&#8217;s simply another step of evolution from product to service.</p>

<p>Here, TiVo is taking a product and making it into a service. IMO, for the US consumer, monthly payments seem much more acceptable, somehow, than paying large amounts one time. Also, with the ever-changing technology behind PVRs, it may not make sense to own them, eventually, for those who are non-technical and don&#8217;t want to tinker. Much easier to just pay a slightly higher fee, and just let someone else make decisions about hardware.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khabri</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/11/tivos-new-free-deal-will-save-you-2-a-year/#comment-33394</link>
		<dc:creator>Khabri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 20:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/11/11/tivos-new-free-deal-will-save-you-2-a-year/#comment-33394</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have never received my rebate checks. If you call them they tell Sir, it was sent 3 weeks ago, You should wait for 1 more week before....or some say we can put a stop payment and then need a letter from stating that you that you didn&#039;t receive.... so just Forget IT!!!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never received my rebate checks. If you call them they tell Sir, it was sent 3 weeks ago, You should wait for 1 more week before&#8230;.or some say we can put a stop payment and then need a letter from stating that you that you didn&#8217;t receive&#8230;. so just Forget IT!!!!!!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Fee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/11/tivos-new-free-deal-will-save-you-2-a-year/#comment-33387</link>
		<dc:creator>James Fee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/11/11/tivos-new-free-deal-will-save-you-2-a-year/#comment-33387</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The logic to me is that you&#039;ll capture those who don&#039;t want to put up $200 up front to get that $150 rebate.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It really isn&#039;t that great of a deal, but I think there are some who can afford the extra $4 a month and not want to worry about or swing the money for a rebate.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The logic to me is that you&#8217;ll capture those who don&#8217;t want to put up $200 up front to get that $150 rebate.</p>

<p>It really isn&#8217;t that great of a deal, but I think there are some who can afford the extra $4 a month and not want to worry about or swing the money for a rebate.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
