Comments on: The TV Show Download Bunkum

By: How CBS and NBC got it wrong « chris . word

How CBS and NBC got it wrong « chris . word — Wed, 22 Aug 2007 04:37:21 +0000

[...] November 9th, 2005 even though they seem like they are trying to do the right thing. it appears that greed trumps innovation yet again. i’ll let om tell it like it is. [...]

By: Alex Liu

Alex Liu — Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:48:13 +0000

wil I pay?

By: Eirik Solheim

Eirik Solheim — Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:34:22 +0000

Spot on. And another example of how clueless parts of the television industry actually is.

I illustrated something similar with the story about how Bob the Millionaire became a pirate here: http://www.eirikso.com/2005/06/06/how-bob-the-millionaire-became-a-pirate/

By: Jesse Kopelman

Jesse Kopelman — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 20:51:22 +0000

Another thing you ind of missed, Om, is how big this news is for DirecTV and Comcast. Maybe especially DirecTV, since they don’t even have real broadband solution. Their worst nightmare is that you can buy shows a la carte off the internet and thus not pay them $30-100/month for a bunch of channels you never watch. I’m surprised we haven’t heard from HBO and Showtime yet, they have the most to lose from people illegally sharing their original programing. My message to them, to paraphrase the Bard, get thee to an iTunes!

By: Thomas Hawk

Thomas Hawk — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:28:52 +0000

Good points Om. I think a good way to look at these paltry offerings from the network studios is to compare where they are with where the music industry has been:

http://thomashawk.com/2005/11/television-executives-stilll-dont-get.html

By: Wes Felter

Wes Felter — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:29:49 +0000

Given the small amount of TV that I watch, I’m not interested in paying for a DVR. But I do have VOD and I would pay $1 for a show that I missed. In fact, I’d rather pay $1 for VOD on my TV than $2 to buy the show from iTunes (and be forced to watch it on my computer).

By: Om Malik

Om Malik — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:37:03 +0000

terry, thanks for that spankdown. well you are right and sorry for not thinking about the affiliates. though i guess since this is the “morning after” offering, they should not be that miffed.

By: Terry Heaton

Terry Heaton — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 16:25:22 +0000

The big news in this announcement is what it does to the network-affiliate relationship, and I think you’ve missed that point here, Om. Although you come close, nobody’s perfect.

By: Peer Pressure

Peer Pressure — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:31:59 +0000

Media Maelstrom

Cory Doctorow has a great mini-rant over at Boing Boing about the oppressive, and frankly obnoxious, tactics used by the movie industry to squelch all possibility of viewers photographing or filming their precious wares. And here I was postulating that...

By: Nicole Simon

Nicole Simon — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 14:47:49 +0000

Well, again it is only half way.

I would gladly pay for my favorite show an amount of money - not sure if it would be really a dollar - if I could view them some days after they air. But for now I have to wait until their DVD releases and / or for a dubbed version on television.

Which is not in any way my model of choice. I have turned on my TV in the last year for 3 or 4 times, I should sell it.

We don't have those kind of services here, with or without ads. But many like me would like to be able to watch our favorite shows some days after they air and keep on track witht the original schedule. But we can't.

I don't know how many Germans would go online and pay for such a download, but I am one.

Well, if they do it good enough. Which means: I can see it when I want and where I want and do not need some crappy DRM to respect just to be able to view what I payed for.

Which is for example why Threshold is uninteresting - only a short period of time to look at it.

There are big chances and I am fairly sure they will blew it again ...

By: Ronald Bruintjes

Ronald Bruintjes — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:55:14 +0000

The best part of the AP news story is the quote from CBS Chairman Leslie Moonves: "This is an incredibly exciting evolution for CBS and network television - video on demand is the next frontier for our industry."

Yes, it may be incredibly exciting to CBS, but old news to the rest of us. It seems they severily limit their audience by only offering this on ComCast. For twice the revenue they could have put it on iTunes, with a much broader audience as a result. I hope they can add that to their distribution channel very soon!

By: Damian

Damian — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:42:24 +0000

I actually think this is a bigger deal than you Om. While you are right that it's really a press release and won't generate a ton of dollars, it is interesting in that it shows the truth has finally hit the content companies: people are blowing off their commericals on DVRs. It is admission, in my mind, that they realize that while the 30 second spot is not dead, revenues from advertising in the future will/may decline.

Just a thought!

Damian

By: Om Malik

Om Malik — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 01:35:52 +0000

This is from the AP report:

"Comcast's service will be available starting in January to customers in markets with a CBS owned-and-operated television station, which includes the nation's seven largest media markets. The episodes will be available as early as midnight following a broadcast and will include commercials."

By: Jason Grunstra

Jason Grunstra — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:50:51 +0000

According to the New York Times article "the CBS and NBC shows will be commercial-free". Who's right? You or them? Times