The TV Show Download Bunkum

Om Malik, Tuesday, November 8, 2005 at 4:57 PM PT Comments (14)

Rationality is the first victim of panic. And right now what I see all around me is a panic driven, knee jerk reactions by media giants to the world which is spiraling out of their control. The perfect example of this panic-driven move is today’s announcement from CBS and NBC. This is such non-news, I cannot even begin to work up outrage.

They want to allow downloads of their popular television shows like CSI and Law and Order:SVU. For 99 cents they will make these shows available for replays on (CBS) Comcast/ (NBC) DirecTV. CBS will allow you to have the privilege of paying a buck for watching the shows with commercials after they have aired. No you cannot take it to go like ABC shows on Video iPod. No it won’t playback on your PC. So in essence you are paying for something you can currently do for free if you own a TiVo/DVR, or even use one of the DVR set-top boxes sold by either Comcast or DirecTV.

What is coming from CBS and NBC is really a press release to appease the Wall Street. They can point to the news and say we are doing something, for god sake. ABC, at least showed some signs of machismo, and decided to try out a new model with Video iPod and iTunes. Clearly a missed opportunity for CBS and NBC. They could have jumped on the Video iPod bandwagon, and perhaps shown that they too can think outside the box. And isn’t there someone who can make Forrester Research’s Josh Bernoff from saying inane things that make you go … duh!

Rating: 57% Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
Print

2 trackbacks so far

November 9th, 2005
8:31 AM PT

Media Maelstrom

Cory Doctorow has a great mini-rant over at Boing Boing about the oppressive, and frankly obnoxious, tactics used by the movie industry to squelch all possibility of viewers photographing or filming their precious wares. And here I was postulating that…

August 21st, 2007
9:37 PM PT

[...] November 9th, 2005 even though they seem like they are trying to do the right thing. it appears that greed trumps innovation yet again. i’ll let om tell it like it is. [...]

12 comments so far

November 8th, 2005
5:50 PM PT

According to the New York Times article “the CBS and NBC shows will be commercial-free”. Who’s right? You or them? Times

November 8th, 2005
6:35 PM PT
Om Malik said:

This is from the AP report:

“Comcast’s service will be available starting in January to customers in markets with a CBS owned-and-operated television station, which includes the nation’s seven largest media markets. The episodes will be available as early as midnight following a broadcast and will include commercials.”

November 9th, 2005
6:42 AM PT
Damian said:

I actually think this is a bigger deal than you Om. While you are right that it’s really a press release and won’t generate a ton of dollars, it is interesting in that it shows the truth has finally hit the content companies: people are blowing off their commericals on DVRs. It is admission, in my mind, that they realize that while the 30 second spot is not dead, revenues from advertising in the future will/may decline.

Just a thought!

Damian

November 9th, 2005
6:55 AM PT
Ronald Bruintjes said:

The best part of the AP news story is the quote from CBS Chairman Leslie Moonves: “This is an incredibly exciting evolution for CBS and network television - video on demand is the next frontier for our industry.”

Yes, it may be incredibly exciting to CBS, but old news to the rest of us. It seems they severily limit their audience by only offering this on ComCast. For twice the revenue they could have put it on iTunes, with a much broader audience as a result. I hope they can add that to their distribution channel very soon!

November 9th, 2005
7:47 AM PT
Nicole Simon said:

Well, again it is only half way.

I would gladly pay for my favorite show an amount of money - not sure if it would be really a dollar - if I could view them some days after they air. But for now I have to wait until their DVD releases and / or for a dubbed version on television.

Which is not in any way my model of choice. I have turned on my TV in the last year for 3 or 4 times, I should sell it.

We don’t have those kind of services here, with or without ads. But many like me would like to be able to watch our favorite shows some days after they air and keep on track witht the original schedule. But we can’t.

I don’t know how many Germans would go online and pay for such a download, but I am one.

Well, if they do it good enough. Which means: I can see it when I want and where I want and do not need some crappy DRM to respect just to be able to view what I payed for.

Which is for example why Threshold is uninteresting - only a short period of time to look at it.

There are big chances and I am fairly sure they will blew it again …

November 9th, 2005
9:25 AM PT
Terry Heaton said:

The big news in this announcement is what it does to the network-affiliate relationship, and I think you’ve missed that point here, Om. Although you come close, nobody’s perfect.

November 9th, 2005
9:37 AM PT
Om Malik said:

terry, thanks for that spankdown. well you are right and sorry for not thinking about the affiliates. though i guess since this is the “morning after” offering, they should not be that miffed.

November 9th, 2005
10:29 AM PT
Wes Felter said:

Given the small amount of TV that I watch, I’m not interested in paying for a DVR. But I do have VOD and I would pay $1 for a show that I missed. In fact, I’d rather pay $1 for VOD on my TV than $2 to buy the show from iTunes (and be forced to watch it on my computer).

November 9th, 2005
11:28 AM PT
Thomas Hawk said:

Good points Om. I think a good way to look at these paltry offerings from the network studios is to compare where they are with where the music industry has been:

(link)

November 9th, 2005
1:51 PM PT
Jesse Kopelman said:

Another thing you ind of missed, Om, is how big this news is for DirecTV and Comcast. Maybe especially DirecTV, since they don’t even have real broadband solution. Their worst nightmare is that you can buy shows a la carte off the internet and thus not pay them $30-100/month for a bunch of channels you never watch. I’m surprised we haven’t heard from HBO and Showtime yet, they have the most to lose from people illegally sharing their original programing. My message to them, to paraphrase the Bard, get thee to an iTunes!

November 12th, 2005
4:34 PM PT

Spot on. And another example of how clueless parts of the television industry actually is.

I illustrated something similar with the story about how Bob the Millionaire became a pirate here:
(link)

March 23rd, 2007
2:48 PM PT
Alex Liu said:

wil I pay?

Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Most Comments

Mozilla Not Worried About Google Browser
Om Malik, September 1, 77 comments
Why is Google Releasing a Browser?
Om Malik, September 1, 62 comments
Joost To Kill Desktop Client
Om Malik, September 5, 55 comments
Why Did Google Abandon Firefox?
Liz Gannes, September 2, 50 comments
Google Browser Puts the Cloud To Work
Om Malik, September 2, 40 comments

Highest Rated

Why Did Google Abandon Firefox?
Liz Gannes, September 2, 60%
Why Did Google Abandon Firefox?
Liz Gannes, September 2, 60%
Google Browser Puts the Cloud To Work
Om Malik, September 2, 59%
NebuAd Loses CEO, Won’t Admit Defeat
Stacey Higginbotham, September 2, 60%
Carbonite CEO: Online Backups Sell
Om Malik, August 31, 60%
Close
E-mail It