<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:go='http://ns.gigaom.com/'
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: San Francisco To Request RFP Soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; Earthlink, Google submit San Francisco WiFi Network</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-110323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; Earthlink, Google submit San Francisco WiFi Network]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 06:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-110323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;[...] The two companies will share the cost of construction and operational expenses. To clarify, this is just a proposal, and not a done deal. The City has asked for proposals back in November 2005. The San Francisco Wireless project has been a politically tough effort, and I wonder how long it will take before the city does get unwired. [...]&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The two companies will share the cost of construction and operational expenses. To clarify, this is just a proposal, and not a done deal. The City has asked for proposals back in November 2005. The San Francisco Wireless project has been a politically tough effort, and I wonder how long it will take before the city does get unwired. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rafer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-110322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Rafer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-110322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kimo, have time for coffee? rafer ... [a]t ... rafer ..... net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kimo, have time for coffee? rafer &#8230; [a]t &#8230; rafer &#8230;.. net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimo Crossman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-110321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kimo Crossman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 02:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-110321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[my site is www.webnetic.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my site is <a href="http://www.webnetic.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.webnetic.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimo Crossman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-110320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kimo Crossman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 02:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-110320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and still the city refuses to release the detailed proposals submitted for the RFI/C, I am leading a big public records request to get these, so that we can give our input on the process.

Rather than just the 7 people on the Techconnect advisory committtee who gave the mayor their aparently secret advice and scoring.  We don&#039;t know anything about the form of the RFP as recommended.

most disconcerting, there has been no explaination of how the public can provide their input on the process.

See my site for more.  It&#039;s really a bummer and it really shouldn&#039;t be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and still the city refuses to release the detailed proposals submitted for the RFI/C, I am leading a big public records request to get these, so that we can give our input on the process.</p>
<p>Rather than just the 7 people on the Techconnect advisory committtee who gave the mayor their aparently secret advice and scoring.  We don&#8217;t know anything about the form of the RFP as recommended.</p>
<p>most disconcerting, there has been no explaination of how the public can provide their input on the process.</p>
<p>See my site for more.  It&#8217;s really a bummer and it really shouldn&#8217;t be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

