<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: San Francisco To Request RFP Soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/</link>
	<description>Trusted Insights and Conversations on the Next Wave of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; Earthlink, Google submit San Francisco WiFi Network</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-33114</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik on Broadband : &#187; Earthlink, Google submit San Francisco WiFi Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 06:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-33114</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] The two companies will share the cost of construction and operational expenses. To clarify, this is just a proposal, and not a done deal. The City has asked for proposals back in November 2005. The San Francisco Wireless project has been a politically tough effort, and I wonder how long it will take before the city does get unwired. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The two companies will share the cost of construction and operational expenses. To clarify, this is just a proposal, and not a done deal. The City has asked for proposals back in November 2005. The San Francisco Wireless project has been a politically tough effort, and I wonder how long it will take before the city does get unwired. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rafer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-33113</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rafer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-33113</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Kimo, have time for coffee? rafer ... [a]t ... rafer ..... net&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kimo, have time for coffee? rafer &#8230; [a]t &#8230; rafer &#8230;.. net</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimo Crossman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-33112</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimo Crossman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 02:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-33112</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;my site is www.webnetic.net&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my site is <a href="http://www.webnetic.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.webnetic.net</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimo Crossman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-33111</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimo Crossman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 02:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.wordpress.com/2005/11/08/san-francisco-to-request-rfp-soon/#comment-33111</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;and still the city refuses to release the detailed proposals submitted for the RFI/C, I am leading a big public records request to get these, so that we can give our input on the process.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rather than just the 7 people on the Techconnect advisory committtee who gave the mayor their aparently secret advice and scoring.  We don&#039;t know anything about the form of the RFP as recommended.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;most disconcerting, there has been no explaination of how the public can provide their input on the process.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;See my site for more.  It&#039;s really a bummer and it really shouldn&#039;t be.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and still the city refuses to release the detailed proposals submitted for the RFI/C, I am leading a big public records request to get these, so that we can give our input on the process.</p>

<p>Rather than just the 7 people on the Techconnect advisory committtee who gave the mayor their aparently secret advice and scoring.  We don&#8217;t know anything about the form of the RFP as recommended.</p>

<p>most disconcerting, there has been no explaination of how the public can provide their input on the process.</p>

<p>See my site for more.  It&#8217;s really a bummer and it really shouldn&#8217;t be.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
